MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S BLACK NOTEBOOKS AND POLITICAL ECONOMY OF CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHICAL CRITIQUE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2016/72245Keywords:
Heidegger's philosophy, interpretation, Black Notebooks, discourse, strategyAbstract
The purpose of the study is to determine the key strategies of philosophical criticism of Heidegger’s Black Notebooks, whose achievement is realized in the following tasks: 1) to identify the body of texts that represent the discourse of philosophical criticism of Heidegger notes; 2) to reveal the typological features of the different strategies of interpreting Black Notebooks; 3) to reconstruct a thematic horizon of Heidegger studies, opened up by discussion on published notes. The methodology combines elements of discourse analysis with traditional methods of historical and philosophical criticism. Scientific novelty is expressed in the following: 1) philosophical discourse of the Notebooks’ reception includes texts of narrowly specialized character (Gatherings collection of articles), as well as reflections of key philosophers (A. Badiou, J.-L. Nancy) 2) basic strategies in philosophical critique of Black Notebooks convey the overall structure of the discourse of interpretation of Heidegger’s legacy, distributed between apologetics and ideological criticism; 3) Black Notebooks have exacerbated the problem of architectonics of Gesammtausgabe and formed the textual basis for the study of "silence" period in philosophical life of Heidegger. Conclusions. The discourse of philosophical critique of Heidegger’s notes proves evidence for ideological charge of philosophizing and justifies socially oriented approaches of historical and philosophical studies examining philosophizing as a special cultural practice, not as a form of sublime creativity.
References
Bibikhin V.V. Delo Haideggera [Heidegger’s case]. In: Filosofia Martina Haideggera i sovremennost [Martin Heidegger’s philosophy and present times]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, pp. 166-171.
Gabriel M. Natsist iz zasady [A Nazi from the ambush]. Voprosy filosofii – Problems of philosophy, 2015, no. 4, pp. 166-169.
Motroshilova N.V. “Cheryye tetradi” M. Haideggera: po sledam publikatsii [M. Heidegger’s Black Notebooks: following the publication]. Voprosy filosofii – Problems of philosophy, 2015, no. 4, pp. 131-162.
Nancy J.-L. Haidegger i my [Heidegger and we]. Voprosy filosofii – Problems of philosophy, 2015, no. 4, pp. 163-165.
Haidegger, “Chernyye tetradi” i Rossiya [Heidegger, Black Notebooks, and Russia]. Available at: http://pressmia.ru/pressclub/20151023/950428746.html. (Accessed 10 June 2016).
Badiou A. A Letter. Available at: http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/1796-a-letter-from-alain-badiou. (Accessed 10 June 2016).
Escuerdo J.A. Heidegger’s Black Notebooks and the question of Anti-Semitism. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 21-49.
Knowles A. Heidegger’s mask: silence, politics, and the banality of evil. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 93-117.
Rayman J. Heidegger’s Nazism as veiled Nitzscheanism and Heideggerianism: evidence from the Black Notebooks. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 77-92.
Steinbock A.J. Heidegger, Machination, and the Jewish question: the problem of the gift. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 50-76.
Trawny P. Heidegger, “World Judaism”, and Modernity. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 2015, vol. 5, pp. 1-20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).