MICROSOPHY OF POWER IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SPACE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2016/72233

Keywords:

microsophy, art, government, scientific and educational space, social interaction, social subject, social dialogue

Abstract

Purpose. The article is aimed to actualize the value of microsophy as the new direction of philosophical research, to analyze scientific and educational reality. Methodology. In terms of methodology used in the study, the focus was on identifying the theoretical positions that lead conceptuality, systematic approaches to understanding existing scientific and educational space, to clarify the essential aspects that underlie this phenomenon. Analysis of the main trends of power relations in the scientific and educational space of transitive Ukrainian society, as well as assessment of possible prospects for development and further evolution of public relations, providing treatment to study the processes are still far from complete, actualized using probabilistic methods of social forecasting. Originality. Modern scientific and educational space is conceptualized as an interactive purposefully organized environment, the main subject of which is conscious, responsible and creative personality, is formed in the course of research and education. Decentralization of scientific and educational space is designated one of the important priorities of social development. The principle of decentralization of power involves the formation of a multi-dimensional system of mutual confrontation and daunting interdetermination of management, the main mechanism of which is social dialogue and self-organization. Conclusions. Scientific and educational environment is the context, measure and vector updating section majority of social management. It is a scientific and educational space formed by an active, purposeful and creative citizen who has to seek a conscious and responsible public administration and government, and to the faithful implementation of the management system will power relations. Postnonclassical scientific and educational reality is seen by us as a communicative area that has a dynamic structure and appears in instability and continuous interaction between different levels of development. Information scientific and educational reality represents itself as the world's fixed power relations within established social institutions, and in particular communicative virtual network elusiveness. That is why actualized the problem of determining the nature of power relations in the scientific and educational space. Microsophy as art micro social updating helps expand the ideological guidance in the defined context.

Author Biography

L. V. Krymets, National Defence University of Ukraine

L. V. Krymets

References

Habermas Yu. Posmetafіzichne mislennia II. Prahmatychnyi povorot (prodovzhennia) [Postmetaphysical thinking. Pragmatic turn (sequel)]. Fіlosofіia osvіty – Philosophy of education, 2011, no. 1-2(10), pp. 35-96.

Diltey V. Predposylki ili usloviya soznaniya libo nauchnogo poznaniya [Requirements or conditions of consciousness or scientific knowledge]. Voprosy filosofii – Problems of Philosophy, 2001, no. 9, pp. 124-125.

Kremen V.H., Tabachnyk D., Tkachenko V. Ukraina: problemy samoorhanizatsii. Tom 2: Desiatyrichchia suspilnoi transformatsii (Ukraine: problems of self-organization. Vol. 2: Decades of social transformation). Kyiv, Promin Publ., 2003. 464 p.

Kremen V.H. Filosofiia liudynotsentryzmu v osvitnomu prostori [Humanocentrism philosophy in educational space]. Kyiv, «Znannia» Ukrainy Publ., 2011. pp. 185-192.

Krymets L.V. Mikrosofiya. Zarozhdeniye novogo napravleniya [Microsophy. The rise of a new direction]. ScienceRise, 2015, no. 11 (16), pp. 100-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2015.53808.

Punchenko O.P., Punchenko N.O. Obrazovaniye v sisteme filosofskikh tsіnnostey [Education system of philosophical values]. Odessa, Pechatnyy dom, Druk Pіvden Publ., 2010. 506 p.

Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksualnosti. Raboty raznykh let [The will to truth: Beyond the knowledge, power and sexuality. Works of different years]. Moscow, Kastal Publ., 1996, pp. 157-192.

Khabermas Yu. Moralnoye soznaniye i kommunikativnoye deystviye [Moral consciousness and communicative action]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2001, 382 p.

Grinin L., Ilyin I., Korotayev A. Globalistics and globalization studies. Moscow Publ., Publishing house Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012. 400 р.

Thirteenth International Conference on Greek Philosophy «The philosophy of communication». Rhodes, 2012. 216 р.

Published

2016-06-22

How to Cite

Krymets, L. V. (2016). MICROSOPHY OF POWER IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL SPACE. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (9), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2016/72233

Issue

Section

SOCIAL ASPECT OF HUMAN BEING