The Anthropological Dimension of Contemporary Esoteriology: Toward Integration into Philosophical Anthropology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i28.349017

Keywords:

holistic human being, new spirituality, anthropological soteriology, philosophical anthropology, Metacontemporary, spiritual self-transformation, postsecularity

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide a philosophical and anthropological justification of contemporary esoteriology as an academic discipline that reveals the spiritual and ontological nature of humans within the context of post-secular, Metamodern culture. The research aims to identify the anthropological potential of esoteriology as a possibility of forming a new humanistic perspective in philosophical anthropology. The theoretical basis of the research is the works of scholars in the academic tradition of "Western esotericism" (A. Faivre, W. Hanegraaff, E. Asprem, J. Strube, K. von Stuckrad, J. Assmann) as well as Ukrainian researchers in the field of anthropology of spirituality (I. Karivets, R. Khalikov, Y. Semchuk, L. Solonko, M. Rodyhin and K. Rodyhin, Y. Shabanova). The anthropological potential of esotericism is analysed as a factor in forming a "new spirituality" – an individually oriented, non-denominational type of spiritual experience that provides individuals with the opportunity for holistic self-knowledge in conditions of social, moral, and military crises. The major areas of the anthropological dimension of esoteriology are identified: existential, moral-value, communicative, socio-cultural, and psychoanthropological. The key functions include meaning-making, compensatory, integrative, and resilient ones. Productive modes within the anthropological dimension of esoteriology have been identified, such as procedurality, multi-structurality, intersubjectivity, spiritual self-transformation, and the ethical responsibility of the esoteric subject as potential opportunities for expanding the philosophical-anthropological perspective. The originality lies in shifting the focus of esoteriology research from studying doctrines to the analysis of humans as subjects of spiritual self-transformation. For the first time, it is proposed to consider anthropological esoteriology as an integrative science that combines academic reflection with spiritual and practical experiences. The conclusions demonstrate that contemporary esoteriology forms a new model of spiritual anthropology, which expands the boundaries of classical philosophical anthropology by integrating direct spiritual experiences into scientific understandings of human nature. The concept of "new spirituality" as a reflection of anthropological trends in Metamodern, defines the contemporary humanitarian turn to the intrapersonal experience of meaning and the restoration of human integrity in conditions of global uncertainty and social crises.

References

Akker, R. van den, Gibbons, A., & Vermeulen, T. (Eds.). (2017). Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism. Rowman & Littlefield. (in English)

Asprem, E. (2018). The Problem of Disenchantment: Scientific Naturalism and Esoteric Discourse, 1900-1939. State University of New York Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438469942 (in English)

Asprem, E., & Granholm, K. (2013). Contemporary Esotericism. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728650 (in English)

Asprem, E., & Strube, J. (Eds.). (2021). New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446458 (in English)

Assmann, J. (2014). Religio Duplex: How the Enlightenment Reinvented Egyptian Religion. Polity Press. (in English)

Corbin, H. (1989). Spiritual Body and Celestial Earth: From Mazdean Iran to Shi’ite Iran. Princeton University Press. (in English)

Eliade, M. (1978). Occultism, Witchcraft, and Cultural Fashions: Essays in Comparative Religions. University of Chicago Press. (in English)

Faivre, A. (1994). Access to Western Esotericism. SUNY Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438402239 (in English)

Faivre, A. (2010). Western Esotericism: A Concise History. State University of New York Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book550 (in English)

Hanegraaff, W. J. (2012). Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048064 (in English)

Hanegraaff, W. J. (2025). Esotericism in Western Culture: Counter-Normativity and Rejected Knowledge. Bloomsbury Publishing. (in English)

Hefner, P. (1993). The Human Factor: Evolution, Culture, and Religion. Fortress Press. (in English)

Jung, C. G. (2024). Psykholohiia ta alkhimiia. Kyiv: Tsentr navchalnoi literatury. (in Ukrainian)

Kalmykov, H., Dobroskok, S., Chyzhma, D., Endeberia, I., & Kyhtuik, O. (2021). Communicative Tolerance vs Communicative Intolerance as a Generative Problem. Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 26-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2021-30-1-26-58 (in Ukrainian)

Kalmykova, L., Kharchenko, N., & Mysan, I. (2021). "I-language" i. e. "Individual language": The Problem of Functional Generalization. Psycholinguistics, 29(1), 59-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2021-29-1-59-99 (in Ukrainian)

Karivets, I. V. (2012). Povsiakdennia: mizh transtsendentalizmom i dyvovyzhnistiu. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo NU "Lvivska politekhnika". (in Ukrainian)

Khalikov, R. (2022). Povstannia proty sekuliarnoho svitu. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Ruslana Khalikova. (in Ukrainian)

Koyré, A. (1987). From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Johns Hopkins University Press. (in English)

Pearson, J. (2001). "Going Native in Reverse": The Insider as Researcher in British Wicca. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 5(1), 52-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2001.5.1.52 (in English)

Rodyhin, K., & Rodyhin, M. (2020). Legends and realities of Ukrainian alchemy: The cultural and historical reminiscences Doctor Faust – Pan Twardowski. Skhid, (1), 5-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2020.1(165).196769 (in English)

Rodyhin, K., & Rodyhin, M. (2023). Alkhimiia Hryhoriia Skovorody. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Ruslana Khalikova. (in Ukrainian)

Scholem, G. (2012). On Jews and Judaism in Crisis: Selected Essays. Paul Dry Books. (in English)

Secret, F. (2006). Les Kabbalistes chrétiens de la Renaissance. Archè. (in French)

Shabanova, Y. O. (2019). Osillation as Determination of Metamodern Philosophy. Epistemological Studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences, 2(2), 13-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/341920 (in Ukrainian)

Shabanova, Y. O. (2024). Shcho take Teosofiia? Svitoch, (78), 15-23. (in Ukrainian)

Solonko, L. (2018). Ancient psychotechnics as a means of compensation of lost existential experience. Skhid, (5), 55-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2018.5(157).148997 (in Ukrainian)

Strube, J. (2024). Religious Comparativism, Esotericism, and the Global Occult: A Methodological Outline. Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society, 10(1), 106-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-bja10080 (in English)

Szönyi, G. E. (2023). The Study of Western Esotericism in East-Central Europe—With a Focus on the Last Decades. Aries, 23(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700593-02301001 (in English)

Tang, Y. (2017). The Neuroscience of Mindfulness Meditation. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46322-3 (in English)

Zavhorodnii, Y. Y. (2013). Retseptsii indiiskoi filosofii v Ukraini. Liniia Ved (1840-1930). Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, Instytut filosofii im. H. S. Skovorody. (in Ukrainian)

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Shabanova, Y. O. (2025). The Anthropological Dimension of Contemporary Esoteriology: Toward Integration into Philosophical Anthropology. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (28), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i28.349017

Issue

Section

ANTHROPOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY