The Value of Self-Sacrifice in the Collective Experience of the War as a Limit Situation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i28.348993Keywords:
self-sacrifice, limit situation, war, existential threat, sacred values, fear of death, heroismAbstract
Purpose. The main purpose of the article is to conceptualize self-sacrifice as a collective cultural phenomenon that emerges under wartime conditions. It aims to clarify how the experience of existential threat influences the values that strengthen national identity and shape moral solidarity. Particular attention is given to the role of self-sacrifice as the community’s existential response to the challenges of war – both as a reaction to danger and as a mechanism for symbolically ordering the experience of mortality. Theoretical basis. The research is based on Karl Jaspers’s philosophical concept of the limit situation and Martin Heidegger’s idea of being-toward-death. It also takes into account the intersubjective interpretation of Dasein and its constitutive being-with, which acquires special significance amid radical rupture. In this context, the assumptions of terror management theory are particularly relevant, emphasizing the increasing importance of sacred values and the heightened awareness of self-sacrifice among citizens following the onset of full-scale war. Interdisciplinary approaches to the phenomenon of heroism – developed in the works of Ernest Becker, Joseph Campbell, and other scholars – are also considered, as they help to elucidate the mechanisms of value-based identification under conditions of existential threat. Originality. The study proposes an interpretation of self-sacrifice not as an exceptional heroic act but as an element of a cultural model that stabilizes the community in times of crisis. It argues that symbolic actions associated with sacrifice can perform a structuring function – shaping moral orientations, sustaining identity, and preserving meaning even amid collective disintegration. Conclusions. In the limit situations of war, self-sacrifice acquires sacred significance as a mode of both individual and collective response to the experience of mortality. It becomes institutionalized in public space, embodied in narratives of memory, cultural practices, and symbolic gestures, thereby serving as a means of affirming shared subjectivity in the face of threat. The article illustrates how a nation can transform the fear of death into a source of cohesion through the moral recognition of self-sacrifice.
References
Arendt, H. (2005). The Origins of Totalitarianism (V. Verloka & D. Horchakov, Trans.). Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. (in Ukrainian)
Atran, S., & Axelrod, R. (2008). Reframing Sacred Values. Negotiation Journal, 24(3), 221-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00182.x (in English)
Becker, E. (1997). The Denial of Death. Free Press. (in English)
Bukkvoll, T., & Steder, F. B. (2024). War and the Willingness to Resist and Fight in Ukraine. Problems of Post-Communism, 71(3), 245-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2023.2277767 (in English)
Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 155-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352321 (in English)
Campbell, J. (2004). The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton University Press. (in English)
Cheremisin, M. (2023). The psychological condition of Ukrainians during the war. Post-War Perspectives. Grail of Science, (34), 336-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.08.12.2023.75 (in English)
Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2013). Sacred Values and Cultural Conflict. In M. J. Gelfand, C. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in Culture and Psychology (pp. 273-301). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199336715.003.0006 (in English)
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror Management Theory of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews: Empirical Assessments and Conceptual Refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61-139). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60016-7 (in English)
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., & Puranen, B. (Eds.). (2022). World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile Version 6.0. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.24 (in English)
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (in English)
Jaspers, K. (1965). Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Springer. (in German)
Jaspers, K. (1973). Philosophie: Existenzerhellung (4th ed., Vol. 2). Springer. (in German)
Maltseva, K., Halimov, E., & Kuchynskyi, O. (2023). Individual values, collective values and sacred values: cognitive ethnography in Ukraine during war. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 7(3), 325-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-023-00134-2 (in English)
McCabe, S., Carpenter, R. W., & Arndt, J. (2016). The role of mortality awareness in hero identification. Self and Identity, 15(6), 707-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1206033 (in English)
Prytula, O. L. (2024). The Phenomenon of Heroism in the Understanding of Philosophical Anthropology. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (26), 14-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i26.319685 (in English)
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 (in English)
Stroh, K. M. (2015). Intersubjectivity of Dasein in Heidegger’s Being and Time: How Authenticity is a Return to Community. Human Studies, 38(2), 243-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9341-9 (in English)
Swann, W. B., Gómez, Á., Dovidio, J. F., Hart, S., & Jetten, J. (2010). Dying and Killing for One’s Group: Identity Fusion Moderates Responses to Intergroup Versions of the Trolley Problem. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1176-1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376656 (in English)
Yogeeswaran, K., & Verkuyten, M. (2022). The Political Psychology of National Identity. In D. Osborne & C. G. Sibley (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 311-328). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779104.022 (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Y. R. Vatsyk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).





