Hesychasm as a Mystical Path to Deification in the Context of Ukrainian Medieval Thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i27.334010Keywords:
anthropology of hesychasm, spiritual values, medieval Ukraine, deification, philosophical-religious thought, mystical experienceAbstract
Purpose. The main purpose of this research is to analyse the anthropology of hesychasm in medieval Ukraine in its relationship with spiritual values, to identify the role of hesychasm in shaping the spiritual outlook of Ukrainian society of that time, and to determine its impact on the modern understanding of human nature, spiritual development and the path to deification in the context of universal religious and philosophical traditions. Theoretical basis. The research is based on modern methodological approaches aimed at studying the relationship between religious anthropology and spiritual values in the context of medieval Ukraine’s hesychasm. The paper examines the philosophical and theological concepts related to hesychasm of Ukrainian thinkers of the Middle Ages, as well as their connections with modern world religious and philosophical traditions. In particular, the authors analyse the influence of hesychasm on the formation of spiritual identity, ethics and morality, as well as its significance in the context of the search for values that contribute to the spiritual development of humanity as a whole. Originality. The originality lies in the comprehensive study of the influence of hesychasm as a religious phenomenon on the formation of spiritual values in medieval Ukraine and their reflection in the context of cultural and religious processes. Conclusions. Hesychasm as a religious practice had a significant impact on the formation of spiritual values in medieval Ukraine, contributing to the development of individual and collective spirituality, as well as to the restoration of the connection with the Divine. The study of hesychasm in the context of spiritual values demonstrates how Ukrainian thinkers adapted and integrated elements of Eastern patristics and Neoplatonism, creating a unique religious and philosophical tradition. The study shows that hesychasm in Ukraine contributed to intercultural dialogue, enriching both local and global religious thought through the exchange of ideas and practices. The study of the anthropology of hesychasm is important for understanding contemporary spiritual pursuits and their roots in historical context, which can help to shape new ways of finding meaning in life and identity. It is necessary to continue studying the influence of hesychasm on contemporary cultural and religious processes, which will contribute to a deeper understanding of spirituality in the modern world.
References
Athanasopoulos, C. (Ed.). (2020). Orthodox Mysticism and Asceticism: Philosophy and Theology in St Gregory Palamas’ Work. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. (in English)
Batsevich, F. (2000). The Ways of the Development of the Linguistic Philosophy of the Eastern Slavs: Byzantine and Southern Slavonic Influences. Problems of Slavonic Studies, (51), 143-148. (in Ukrainian)
Bosman, C. F. (2024). Hesychasm and the Jesus Prayer: Spiritual Formation in an Ecumenical World – Exploring the Practice of the Eastern Orthodox Jesus Prayer with the Evangelical Protestant Tradition (Master’s thesis). The University of Notre Dame Australia. Retrieved from https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/413 (in English)
Elliott, C. (2011). Mission as Ascetic Experience: Hesychasm and the Anthropology of Sergei Horujy for Mission Theology. Mission Studies, 28(2), 228-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157338311x602361 (in English)
Eskov, S. (2014). Hesyhasm in the discourse of philosophical antropology. Worldview – Philosophy – Religion, (6), 72-80. (in English)
Hudzenko, O. (2019). Hesychasm as a way to theosis in philosophical and religious views of representatives of the Ukrainian Middle Ages. In Modern philosophy in the context of intercultural communication: Collective monograph (pp. 235-243). Lviv-Toruń: Liha-Pres. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-173-5/235-243 (in English)
Hudzenko, O. G., & Dobrodum, O. V. (2024). Spiritual Quest of Ukrainian Thinkers of the 16th – Early 17th Centuries in the Context of the Doctrine of Theosis. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (25), 112-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307661 (in English)
Hudzenko, O., Palinchak, M., & Dobrodum, O. (2024). Religious-anthropological aspects of self-realization in the era of global upheavals. Proceedings of Azerbaijan High Technical Educational Institutions Journal, Forthcoming. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=4746590 (in English)
Ignatyev, V. A. (2014). Hesychasm: the contradiction of narratives in religious and philosophical discourse. Philosophical Horizons, (32), 70-80. (in Ukrainian)
Kalmykov, H., Dobroskok, S., Chyzhma, D., Endeberia, I., & Kyhtuik, O. (2021). Communicative Tolerance vs Communicative Intolerance as a Generative Problem. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 30(1), 26-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2021-30-1-26-58 (in Ukrainian)
Kletsova, S. (2003). Tradytsii mistytsyzmu v konteksti ukrainskoi khrystyianskoi filosofii kintsia XVI – pochatku XVII stolit. Nauka. Relihiia. Suspilstvo, (4), 40-45. (in Ukrainian)
Levchenko, N. M. (2018). Biblical hermeneutics in ancient Ukrainian literature: Monography. Kharkiv: Maidan. (in Ukrainian)
Matytsyn, O. I. (2011). Bulgarian hesychasm and its relationship with the Ukrainian theological and aesthetic tradition. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University. Philosophy, 102, 58-62. (in Ukrainian)
Nenya, H. O. (2006). Isykhazm yak spetsyfichna pravoslavna svitohliadno-bohoslovska kontseptsiia mistychnoi filosofii khrystyianstva. Мultiversum. Philosophical almanac, (53), 88-97. (in Ukrainian)
Nyunt, M. M. (2015). Hesychasm Encounters Lectio Divina: An Intercultural Analysis of Eastern and Western Christian Contemplative Practices. The Asbury Journal, 70(1), 76-94. (in English)
Pavlyk, N. (2021). Ascetic Practices in Interfaith Dialogue: Jain Yoga and Orthodox Hesychasm. The Ecumenical Review, 73(5), 804-820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/erev.12660 (in English)
Predko, O. I. (2005). Molytva yak chynnyk dukhovnosti: bohoslovski ta filosofski vymiry. Nova paradyhma: Filosofiia. Sotsiolohiia. Politolohiia, (42), 22-32. (in Ukrainian)
Rafalskyi, O. O., Kalakura, Y. S., Kotsur, V. P., & Yurii, M. F. (2020). Antropolohichnyi kod ukrainskoi kultury i tsyvilizatsii (Vol. 1). Kyiv: Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)
Schooping, J. (2019). Apophatic Anthropology and Hesychasm: Attending to the Mysterious Depths of Human Being. International Journal of Orthodox Theology, 10(4), 49-85. (in English)
Semchuk, Y. Y. (2015). Anthropocentric intention of hesychast and sufistic practices of freedom personal development. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (7), 36-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2015/43426 (in Ukrainian)
Shevchuk, V. (Comp.). (2019). Mudrist peredvichna. Aforyzmy davnikh ukrainskykh myslyteliv ХІ – poch. ХІХ st. Kyiv: Clio. (in Ukrainian)
Shumylo, S. (2018). The Recognition of Hesychasm Ideas in the Old Eastern Christian Literature (On the Example of Epiphanius the Wise’s Works). Ucrainica Mediaevalia, 1, 53-82. (in Ukrainian)
Toti, M. (2008). The Hesychast method of prayer: its anthropological and symbolic significance. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 8(1), 17-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742250701841699 (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 O. G. Hudzenko, O. V. Dobrodum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).