Philosophical-Anthropological Aspects of Space Exploration: Main Contradictions and Prospects for Consensus

O. V. Stovpets

doi:10.15802/ampr.v0i27.334002

Authors

O. V. Stovpets Odessa National Maritime University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8001-4223

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i27.334002

Keywords:

human, anthroposphere, space, technologies, competition, cooperation, expansion, Anthropocene

Abstract

Purpose. In this article, the author aims to provide a philosophic-anthropological study on the prospects of space exploration by clarifying several related questions: Why should mankind explore extraterrestrial space? Where are the key consensus points, the achievement of which will be the determining prerequisites for mankind to go beyond the current boundaries of inhabited space and establish ourselves in the outer world? How could anthropology help today in preparing for space exploration? Theoretical basis. The author has taken into account a number of recent studies that focus on the social-anthropological aspects of the current stage of space exploration and development. Of particular interest are those specific social techniques and descriptive methods that anthropologists propose to incorporate into contemporary space exploration. These include: thick description method, double exposure method, participant observation method, and special practices of "dwelling", "placing", mapping, outlining, visualizing, etc. Originality. From a philosophic-anthropological perspective, the author focuses on understanding the current counterpoints on the path of space exploration, in particular, analyzing the contradictions between technocratic, pragmatic-political, and humanistic approaches to space expansion. Possible prospects for consensus between different worldview positions on the place and role of man in the process of space colonization are formulated. The anthropological discourse is expanded in terms of studying the possible impact of space development for human identity, existential status, and ethical guidelines of the human civilization. Conclusions. The near-Earth space has already become an object of influence of human technologies. But so far men themselves in near-Earth space are rare, rather exceptional phenomena. Man, at this stage of space industry development, is mostly just an operator of space equipment. The constant presence of people (with their social, cultural, political, psychological and all other "human" attitudes) will probably contribute to the gradual transformation of this space into an "anthroposphere".

References

Anderson, S. W., Christensen, K., & LaManna, J. (2019). The development of natural resources in outer space. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 37(2), 227-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2018.1507343 (in English)

Bazaluk, O. (2023a). Discursive Thinking Through of Education: Learning from Those Who Transform the Universe. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003450726 (in English)

Bazaluk, O. (2023b). What is the Passing Through (Dierkhomai) into Alēthēs (Unconcealed)? Philosophy and Cosmology, 30, 4-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/30/1 (in English)

Borinshtein, Y., Stovpets, O., Kukshinova, O., Kisse, A., & Kucherenko, N. (2021). Phenomena of freedom and justice in the interpretations of T. Hobbes and J. Locke. Amazonia Investiga, 10(42), 255-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.42.06.24 (in English)

Cassirer, E. (2023). Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance. Die Platonische Renaissance in England und die Schule von Cambridge. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. (in German)

Dalakoglou, D., & Harvey, P. (2012). Roads and Anthropology: Ethnographic Perspectives on Space, Time and (Im)Mobility. Mobilities, 7(4), 459-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.718426 (in English)

Dance, A. (2019). Can Anthropologists Propel Astronauts Toward Mars? SAPIENS – Anthropology Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.sapiens.org/culture/nasa-anthropologist/ (in English)

Downes, S. M., & Machery, E. (Eds.). (2013). Arguing About Human Nature: Contemporary Debates. Routledge. (in English)

Fa, W., & Jin, Y.-Q. (2007). Quantitative estimation of helium-3 spatial distribution in the lunar regolith layer. Icarus, 190(1), 15-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2007.03.014 (in English)

Farman, A. (2013). Speculative Matter: Secular Bodies, Minds, and Persons. Cultural Anthropology, 28(4), 737-759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cuan.12035 (in English)

Fuentes, A. (2017). Human niche, human behaviour, human nature. Interface Focus, 7(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0136 (in English)

Geertz, C. (2017). Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected essays (3rd ed., pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books. (in English)

Gleiser, M. (2012). From cosmos to intelligent life: the four ages of astrobiology. International Journal of Astrobiology, 11(4), 345-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1473550412000237 (in English)

Greenberg, I. (2024). The Human Being as the Image of God. Modern Judaism – A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience, 44(2), 89-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mj/kjae014 (in English)

Halapsis, A. V. (2019). Gods of Transhumanism. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (16), 78-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.188397 (in English)

Johnson, J. R., Swindle, T. D., & Lucey, P. G. (1999). Estimated solar wind-implanted helium-3 distribution on the Moon. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(3), 385-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GL900305 (in English)

Klinger, J. M. (2021a). Critical Geopolitics of Outer Space. Geopolitics, 26(3), 661-665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1803285 (in English)

Klinger, J. M. (2021b). Environmental Geopolitics and Outer Space. Geopolitics, 26(3), 666-703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1590340 (in English)

Kramer, W. R. (2017). In dreams begin responsibilities – environmental impact assessment and outer space development. Environmental Practice, 19(3), 128-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2017.1338874 (in English)

McComb, E. (2014). Integrating Women into the Astronaut Corps: Politics and Logistics at NASA, 1972–2004 by Amy E. Foster (review). Technology and Culture, 55(2), 507-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2014.0038 (in English)

Messeri, L. (2016). Placing Outer Space: An Earthly Ethnography of Other Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press. (in English)

Olson, V., & Messeri, L. (2015). Beyond the Anthropocene: Un-Earthing an Epoch. Environment and Society, 6(1), 28-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2015.060103 (in English)

Redfield, P. (2000). Space in the Tropics: From Convicts to Rockets in French Guiana. Berkeley: University of California Press. (in English)

Rummel, C. (2018). Perhaps woman are better astronauts? Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 74, 47-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2018.09.021 (in English)

Sarkar, S. (2022). The DRAKE mission: finding the frequency of life in the Cosmos. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 512(4), 5228-5246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac175 (in English)

Spector, S., Higham, J. E. S., & Doering, A. (2017). Beyond the biosphere: tourism, outer space, and sustainability. Tourism Recreation Research, 42(3), 273-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2017.1286062 (in English)

Stezhko, Z. V., & Khmil, T. V. (2023). Artificial Intelligence as a Socio-Cultural Phenomenon: the Educational Dimension. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (24), 68-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i24.295317 (in English)

Stovpets, O. (2024). Philosophic-anthropological aspects of the development of artificial intelligence: a view from 2024. Interdisciplinary studies of complex systems, (24), 57-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31392/iscs.2024.24.057 (in Ukrainian)

Stovpets, O., Borinshtein, Y., Yershova-Babenko, I., Kozobrodova, D., Madi, H., & Honcharova, O. (2023). Digital technologies and human rights: challenges and opportunities. Amazonia Investiga, 12(72), 17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.72.12.2 (in English)

Svyrydenko, D., & Stovpets, O. (2020). Chinese Perspectives in the "Space Race" through the Prism of Global Scientific and Technological Leadership. Philosophy and Cosmology, 25, 57-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/25/5 (in English)

Szocik, K. (2020). Human Future in Space and Gene Editing: Waiting for Feminist Space Ethics and Feminist Space Philosophy. Theology and Science, 18(1), 7-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1693154 (in English)

Tashima, N., Crain, C. E., Briody, E. K., Van Arsdale, P., Erickson, K., Lehman, D., Pester, T. M., & Kellersohn, K. (2019). Anthropological Argonauts. Anthropology News, 60(4), e90-e94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/an.1204 (in English)

Vertesi, J. (2015). Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. The University of Chicago Press. (in English)