Thematisation of Recognition in the Anthropological Reflections of Pierre Bourdieu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i27.333949Keywords:
human, society, symbolic capital, justification, concept, sociological analysis, recognitionAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to elucidate the essence of the concept of recognition in the context of the philosophical and anthropological views of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. The main objectives include analyzing the scholar’s critique of philosophy as "scholastic" theorizing, reconstructing his philosophical and anthropological ideas, and uncovering the existential significance of the human striving for recognition. Theoretical basis. The research builds on Bourdieu’s interpretation of recognition as a fundamental existential goal through which individuals seek to justify the meaning and purpose of their existence. In his concept of recognition, Bourdieu identifies the desire for authority, status, and prestige – components of symbolic capital – as the primary driver of human behavior. This symbolic capital, however, can only be accumulated within society. Simultaneously, recognition becomes a source of competition and rivalry for possession of symbolic capital, driving societal development. At the core of Bourdieu’s philosophical and anthropological ideas lies an attempt to frame the subject of study within objective structures, thereby aligning subjective human experience with the impact of external social structures. Originality. Taking into account Bourdieu’s critique of the "systemic" flaws of philosophy, which is dominated by a "scholastic" mindset, this study reconstructs his philosophical and anthropological ideas rooted in the empirical trajectory of his research, which is primarily grounded in sociological analysis. The concept of recognition is presented as the societal counterpart to the theological notion of justification, serving as a foundation for understanding the meaning of human life. The agonistic nature of the concept of symbolic capital highlights recognition as a constitutive dimension of human existence in society. Conclusions. Sociological analysis, as a prerequisite for Bourdieu’s philosophical and anthropological reflections, does not imply a rejection of philosophical methodology. Instead, it underscores a belief that sociological tools are better suited for constructing of a universal human concept. Since Bourdieu’s ideas were shaped by studying specific sociological scenarios, which in turn formed his theoretical framework, his concepts should be viewed as both the prerequisites for and the outcomes of this methodology. From this perspective, Bourdieu’s understanding of recognition in the social field emerges as the result of human interaction with social structures and other individuals who impose demands and set tasks, facilitating the acquisition of social status – that is, the accumulation of symbolic capital.
References
Bazaluk, O. (2024). Aletheia vs. Truth: Socratic Logos for a Modern Understanding of the Universe. Philosophy and Cosmology, 32, 117-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/32/9 (in English)
Boreiko, Y. H. (2020). Sociocultural determinant of the symbolic violence phenomenon. SOPHIA. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 15(1), 5-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2020.15.1 (in Ukrainian)
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (in English)
Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In Other Words: Essays Toward a Reflexive Sociology (M. Adamson, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (in English)
Bourdieu, P. (1990b). The Logic of Practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (in English)
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Pascalian Meditations (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (in English)
Bourdieu, P. (1999). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Stanford University Press. (in English)
Bourdieu, P. (2024). Paskalivski medytatsii (O. Yosypenko, Trans.). Kyiv: Tempora. (in Ukrainian)
Carnevali, B. (2020). The greatness and limits of the social: Axel Honneth’s philosophical journey. Revue de métaphysique et de morale, (105), 85-108. (in English)
Dybczyńska, J. (2024). Francuski atom a kapitał symboliczny Bourdieu. Praktyka Teoretyczna, (1), 93-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2024.1.5 (in Polish)
Honneth, A. (1992). Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition. Political Theory, 20(2), 187-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591792020002001 (in English)
Honneth, A. (1996). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (J. Anderson, Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press. (in English)
Ikäheimo, H. (2022). Recognition and the Human Life-Form: Beyond Identity and Difference. Routledge. (in English)
Kholod, O. (2023). Psycholinguistic Models of Explanation Vital Values of Ukrainians. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 33(1), 190-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2023-33-1-190-211 (in Ukrainian)
Peters, G. (2012). The Social as Heaven and Hell: Pierre Bourdieu’s Philosophical Anthropology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42(1), 63-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00477.x (in English)
Piroddi, C. (2021). Hope, habitus and social recognition: A Bourdieusian proposal. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(4), 619-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12325 (in English)
Piroddi, C. (2022). Fields of Recognition: A Dialogue Between Pierre Bourdieu and Axel Honneth. Human Studies, 45(2), 311-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09630-w (in English)
Sytnichenko, L. A., & Usov, D. V. (2023). The Problem of Recognition in Modern Philosophy: Social and Anthropological Dimensions. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (23), 133-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i23.283632 (in English)
Vázquez Gutiérrez, J. P. (2022). Poder simbólico, illusio y afectividad en la sociología de Pierre Bourdieu. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 29, 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v29i0.17878 (in Spanish)
Yosypenko, O., & Yosypenko, S. (2021). Pierre Bourdieu’s "Pascal Meditations": translation difficulties. Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought), (1), 162-168. (in Ukrainian)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Y. H. Boreiko, T. V. Fedotova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).