Cognitive Experience in Positivism and Pragmatism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i26.319737

Keywords:

cognitive experience, anthropological approach, biosocial nature of man, pragmatism, human life experience, human practical experience, universal human values

Abstract

Purpose. The main purpose of the article is to compare the anthropological context of the concept of cognitive experience in pragmatism, which is based on an empirical basis and is determined by the result of the interaction of a person as a biosocial being with the surrounding natural and social environment through experimentation and choosing the most optimal way of acting in a given situation in accordance with individual and social values, on the one hand, and the exclusively epistemological significance of cognitive experience in positivism, aimed at observation and verification empirical data, on the other hand. Theoretical basis. The anthropological approach is important for this study, since its defining theoretical idea is the focus on the inseparability of theoretical and practical approaches to the integrity of human activity, proposed by pragmatism. Unlike positivism, which absolutizes theoretical knowledge of reality, supported by empirical experience, pragmatism understands this knowledge as an element of the practical adaptive activity of a person as a biosocial being who constructs the natural and social environment necessary for his/her life, transforming uncertainty into certainty. Thus, from the position of radical empiricism of W. James, a person’s cognitive experience includes not only knowledge of what is before a person’s eyes "here and now", but also values, interests, moral feelings that determine the purpose, prospects and motives of his/her activity. Originality. Thanks to an anthropological approach, pragmatism achieves a more complete understanding of cognitive experience than positivism. If in positivism cognitive experience is valuable in itself, then in pragmatism it, through feedback, performs the function of reflective practical experimentation, which should ensure the effectiveness of practical actions of a person as a biosocial being. Cognitive experience is an important component of habit, which for pragmatism is, on the one hand, the accumulated experience of a person’s long-term practical adaptation to the natural and social environment, and on the other – a person’s ability to find innovative ways of survival in the event of a change in the determining circumstances of life support. Thus, in extreme existential conditions of human existence (ecological and social disasters, wars), human-centred and socio-centred values, including identity values, together with strategically verified pragmatic optimality of actions, provided by cognitive experience, are important for the survival and development of man and society. Conclusions. Using an anthropological approach, pragmatism considers cognitive experience in a human-dimensional aspect. From the entire spectrum of cognitive experience, which enables a person to navigate in the natural and social environment, there is a part that allows a person to apply the acquired knowledge in productive practical activities based on universal values. From the point of view of pragmatism, cognitive experience based on experimentation with reflective feedback is important for ensuring the effectiveness of human practical actions. In the conditions of epoch-making social transformations currently taking place in the world, the survival and development of a civilization based on universal human values largely depends on the effectiveness of the actualized cognitive experience of a person, his or her intellectual and moral resources.

References

Cenci, A. (2020). The "Economic Method" and Its Ethical Component: Pluralism, Objectivity and Values in Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach. In W. J. Gonzalez (Ed.), Methodological Prospects for Scientific Research: From Pragmatism to Pluralism (pp. 207-234). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52500-2_11 (in English)

Dewey, J. (1998). The Logic of Judgments of Practice (1915). In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The Essential Dewey: Ethics, Logic, Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 236-271). Indiana University Press. (in English)

Ferrari, M. (2017). William James and the Vienna Circle. In S. Pihlström, F. Stadler, & N. Weidtmann (Eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism (pp. 15-42). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50730-9_2 (in English)

Greene, C., & Steuer, M. (2020). The Methodology of Theories in Context: The Case of Economic Clustering. In W. J. Gonzalez (Ed.), Methodological Prospects for Scientific Research: From Pragmatism to Pluralism (pp. 121-137). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52500-2_7 (in English)

Guillan, A. (2020). Methodological Incidence of the Realms of Reality: Prediction and Complexity. In W. J. Gonzalez (Ed.), Methodological Prospects for Scientific Research: From Pragmatism to Pluralism (pp. 81-96). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52500-2_5 (in English)

Hickman, L. A. (2019). Pragmatism as Post-Postmodernism: Lessons from John Dewey. Fordham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.63578 (in English)

Honnacker, A. (2020). Environmentalism and Democracy. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XII(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2132 (in English)

Ibanez, B. P. (2021). The (Very Needed) Experimental Turn in Ethics. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XIII(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2455 (in English)

James, W. (1912). Essays in Radical Empiricism. Longmans, Green, and Company. (in English)

Klenk, M. (2021). Pragmatism and Moral Objectivity. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XIII(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2677 (in English)

Koskinen, H. J. (2017). On Rational Restraints of Ontology. In S. Pihlström, F. Stadler, & N. Weidtmann (Eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism (pp. 103-123). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50730-9_6 (in English)

Legg, C., & Reynolds, J. (2022). Habits of Mind. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XIV(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2994 (in English)

Marchetti, S. (2021). Introduction to Pragmatist Ethics: Theory and Practice. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XIII(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2664 (in English)

Pihlström, S. (2017). On the Viennese Background of Harvard Neopragmatism. In S. Pihlström, F. Stadler, & N. Weidtmann (Eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism (pp. 139-166). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50730-9_8 (in English)

Rescher, N. (2020). Methodological Pragmatism. In W. J. Gonzalez (Ed.), Methodological Prospects for Scientific Research: From Pragmatism to Pluralism (pp. 69-80). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52500-2_4 (in English)

Romizi, D. (2017). Classical Pragmatism and Metaphysics: James and Peirce on Scientific Determinism. In S. Pihlström, F. Stadler, & N. Weidtmann (Eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism (pp. 43-66). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50730-9_3 (in English)

Rubeis, G. (2017). Beyond Realism and Antirealism? The Strange Case of Dewey’s Instrumentalism. In S. Pihlström, F. Stadler, & N. Weidtmann (Eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism (pp. 67-82). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50730-9_4 (in English)

Santarelli, M. (2021). Between Problematization and Evaluation. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XIII(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2450 (in English)

Schulenberg, U. (2021). Pragmatism, Humanism, and Form. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XIII(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2563 (in English)

Stadler, F. (2017). Ernst Mach and Pragmatism – The Case of Mach’s Popular Scientific Lectures (1895). In S. Pihlström, F. Stadler, & N. Weidtmann (Eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism (pp. 3-14). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50730-9_1 (in English)

Uebel, T. (2017). American Pragmatism, Central-European Pragmatism and the First Vienna Circle. In S. Pihlström, F. Stadler, & N. Weidtmann (Eds.), Logical Empiricism and Pragmatism (pp. 83-102). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50730-9_5 (in English)

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Lyubiviy, Y. V., & Samchuk, R. V. (2024). Cognitive Experience in Positivism and Pragmatism. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (26), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i26.319737

Issue

No. 26 (2024)

Section

ANTHROPOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Y. V. Lyubiviy, R. V. Samchuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).