Tolerance Limits of Cruelty in the Philosophy of the 20th Century: The Possibility of an Ambivalent Interpretation

N. V. Borodina; Y. M. Melnyk

doi:10.15802/ampr.v0i26.319701

Authors

N. V. Borodina Ukrainian National Tchaikovsky Academy of Music, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7502-518X
Y. M. Melnyk Odesa National University of Technology, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-842X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i26.319701

Keywords:

cruelty, violence, human rights, modern philosophy, Bataille, Sartre, Camus

Abstract

Purpose. The research explores the ambivalent interpretations of the tolerance limits of cruelty in 20th-century philosophy. Theoretical basis. The research is based on the concepts of Jean-Paul Sartre, Georges Bataille, and Albert Camus, who do not justify cruelty but demonstrate its potential legitimacy under certain circumstances. Originality. The authors have identified three main perspectives on tolerating cruelty, which form the foundation for an ambivalent interpretation. These perspectives include the justification of cruelty as necessary in the struggle for social justice (Sartre), the justification of cruelty towards oneself as a consequence of human rights and freedoms (Camus), and the justification of epistemological cruelty as a means to expand the boundaries of knowledge (Bataille). Conclusions. The ambivalent interpretation of cruelty, as exemplified by Bataille, Camus, and Sartre, blurs the tolerance limits of cruelty and creates opportunities for manipulations that may infringe upon people’s rights and freedoms. If Camus’s concept remains within the limits of respect for human dignity, then in Sartre’s interpretation, a person can be perceived as a tool for social struggle, and in Bataille – as an opportunity to gain a new ecstatic experience through cruel treatment of others.

References

Bataille, G. (1957). Literature and Evil. New York: Urizen Books. (in English)

Bataille, G. (1978). Die psychologische Struktur des Faschismus – Die Souveränität. München: Matthes & Seitz. (in German)

Bataille, G. (1986). Erotism: Death and Sensuality (M. Dalwood, Trans.). San Francisco: City Lights Books. Retrieved from https://monoskop.org/images/a/a8/Bataille_Georges_Erotism_Death_and_Sensuality.pdf (in English)

Bush, S. S. (2012). Georges Bataille’s Mystical Cruelty. Journal of Religious Ethics, 40(3), 551-555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2012.00536.x (in English)

Camus, A. (1951). The Rebel. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.507721/2015.507721.The-Rebel_djvu.txt (in English)

Council of Europe. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_eng (in English)

Dorchain, C. S. (2022). Crime as Language II – Hyperviolence and Georges Bataille’s Concept of the Sovereign. Athens Journal of Philosophy, 1(3), 173-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30958/ajphil.1-3-4 (in English)

Evangelou, A. (2010). Georges Bataille’s 'Ethics of Violence'. PHARMAKON, 3(2), 51-64. Retrieved from https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/skepsi/files/2010/12/vol-3.2-5-Evangelou.pdf (in English)

Lakan, J. (1988). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book 1: Freud’s Papers on Technique 1953-1954 (J.-A. Miller, Ed., J. Forrester, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (in English)

Nietzsche, F. (2013). Beyond Good and Evil. Retrieved from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4363/4363-h/4363-h.htm (in English)

Nietzsche, F. (2022). Narodzhennia trahedii. Nevchasni mirkuvannia I‒IV (K. Kotiuk & O. Feshovets, Trans.). Kyiv: Astrolabe Publishing. (in Ukrainian)

Santoni, R. E. (2013). Concerning the Ambivalence of Sartre on Violence: A Commentary/Rejoinder. Sartre Studies International, 19(2), 112-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/ssi.2013.190207 (in English)

Sartre, J.-P. (1949). What Is Literature. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/whatisliterature030271mbp (in English)

Sartre, J.-P. (1961). Preface to Frantz Fanon’s "Wretched of the Earth". Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sartre/1961/preface.htm (in English)

Shevtsov, S. P. (2022). On the Ontology of Violence. Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture, 6(4), 48-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2022.0034 (in English)

Sliusar, V. M. (2017). Nasyllia: sotsialno-filosofska pryroda: Monohrafiia. Zhytomyr: Vydavnytstvo Yevenok O. O. (in Ukrainian)

Sze, J. A. M. (2010). Sartre and the Moral Limits of War and Terrorism. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203860328 (in English)

United Nations. (1948). International Bill of Human Rights : Universal Declaration of Human Rights : resolution / adopted by the General Assembly. Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/670964 (in English)