Ukrainian Identity in the Context of Memory and Forgetting: Philosophical and Anthropological Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i26.319686Keywords:
memory, forgetting, nation, identity, values, culture, human, mentalityAbstract
Purpose. The main content of the presented study is a philosophical and anthropological analysis of the problem of memory in the context of the phenomenon of forgetting, the essential factors of establishing a new image of the Ukrainian person, his/her national memory and identity. This circumstance, in the situation of Ukraine’s defence against the Russian aggressor, upholding of freedoms and European values, poses the following tasks: 1) to undertake a consistent review of the conceptual content of the concepts of "memory" and "forgetting" and to identify their philosophical and anthropological content; 2) to analyse the phenomenon of national memory and show its significance for the struggle of the Ukrainian people for the European choice; 3) to study the main parameters of the process of forming a system of new values in the context of the phenomenon of forgetting in the discourse of philosophical anthropology. Theoretical basis. The complex and dynamic process of forming Ukrainian identity in the contexts of national memory and forgetting brings the system of life values to a new level of theoretical and methodological understanding. The philosophical and anthropological dimension of the values of a modern Ukrainian person allows us to engage the methodological discourses of memory studies, which are a way for people to construct their historical past in the perspective of creating a new future in the integrity of axiological, moral and existential content. The relevance of this problem is due to the crisis of worldview and cultural meanings of human existence in the context of war, the processes of which have a powerful impact on all aspects of social, political, and spiritual life, which ultimately leads to the need for a new type of communication, thinking, and behaviour. Originality. The study substantiates that the phenomenon of forgetting in the context of the formation of a new national memory largely determines the strategy of asserting Ukrainian identity in the context of modern civilizational challenges faced by Ukraine as a result of military aggression against its freedom and territorial integrity. This situation opens up new prospects for the formation of a civilizational system of values in interaction with a qualitatively different image of the Ukrainian person. Conclusions. Today, the Ukrainian state is facing an existential threat, which raises the problem of creating a new Ukrainian person whose worldview and system of values correspond to the image of a European person. Despite the serious problems that Ukraine has faced as a result of geopolitical contradictions on a global scale, philosophical and anthropological analysis has shown that the strategy of forming a new Ukrainian identity in the context of historical memory, which contains an element of forgetting, determines the process of creating a mentality that is consistent with the national strategy of entering Western civilisation. It is within the parameters of such an analysis that a new memory adequate to the needs of our time is formed.
References
Anderson, B. (2000). Uiavlena spilnota (O. Terekh, Trans.). In O. Protsenko & V. Lisovyi (Eds.), Natsionalizm: Antolohiia (pp. 567-579). Kyiv: Smoloskyp. (in Ukrainian)
Assmann, J. (2010). Communicative and Cultural Memory. In A. Erll & A. Nünning (Eds.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (pp. 109-118). De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207262.2.109 (in English)
Connerton, P. (2011). The Spirit of Mourning: History, Memory and the Body. Cambridge University Press. (in English)
Delich, F. (2004). The Social Construction of Memory and Forgetting. Diogenes, 51(1), 65-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192104041694 (in English)
Erll, A. (2022). The hidden power of implicit collective memory. Memory, Mind & Media, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/mem.2022.7 (in English)
Fichte, J. G. (2017). Reden an die deutsche Nation. Berlin: Edition Holzinger. (in German)
Garde-Hansen, J. (2011). Media and Memory. Edinburgh University Press. (in English)
Ilin, V. V. (2023). The Memory of the Second World War in the Context of the Discourse "Forgetting": a Philosophical and Methodological Analysis. In A. I. Kudriachenko (Ed.), Pam’iat pro Druhu svitovu viinu: peremozhtsi ta peremozheni: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats (pp. 50-59). Kyiv: Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)
Kaplan, B. A. (Ed.). (2023). Critical Memory Studies: New Approaches. Bloomsbury Academic. (in English)
Klein, K. L. (2000). On the Emergence of Memory in Historical Discourse. Representations, 69, 127-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2902903 (in English)
Neal, A. G. (1998). National Trauma and Collective Memory: Major Events in the American Century. Routledge. (in English)
Orjuela, C. (2024). Remembering/forgetting hunger: towards an understanding of famine memorialisation. Third World Quarterly, 45(2), 259-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2200928 (in English)
Renan, E. (2000). Shcho take natsiia? (M. Zalizniak, Trans.). In O. Protsenko & V. Lisovyi (Eds.), Natsionalizm: Antolohiia (pp. 107-120). Kyiv: Smoloskyp. (in Ukrainian)
Ricoeur, P. (2003). La Mémoire, l’Histoire, l’Oubli. Paris: Seuil. (in French)
Sierp, A. (2021). Memory Studies – Development, Debates and Directions. In M. Berek, K. Chmelar, O. Dimbath, H. Haag, M. Heinlein, N. Leonhard, V. Rauer, & G. Sebald (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Gedächtnisforschung. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26593-9_42-1. Retrieved from https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/97308636/Sierp_2021_Memory_studies_development_debates_and_directions.pdf (in English)
Stainforth, E. (2022). Collective memory or the right to be forgotten? Cultures of digital memory and forgetting in the European Union. Memory Studies, 15(2), 257-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980211044707 (in English)
Tulving, E. (2007). Are There 256 Different Kinds of Memory? In J. S. Nairne (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger, III (pp. 39-52). New York: Psychology Press. (in English)
Turner, F. M. (2014). European Intellectual History from Rousseau to Nietzsche (R. A. Lofthouse, Ed.). Yale University Press. (in English)
Verovšek, P. J. (2024). Collective Memory and the Stalling of European Integration: Generational Dynamics and the Crisis of European Leadership. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13584 (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 A. O. Khodzhaian, N. V. Savchuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).