Kant’s Philosophy and the Idea of the Self-Made-Man
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307669Keywords:
Kant’s philosophy, intellectual and moral autonomy, self-defined personality, the Self-made-man ideaAbstract
Purpose. The authors of this article set the main purpose of understanding the ideological potential of Kant’s philosophical heritage from the viewpoint of its influence on the spread and legitimization of the self-made man idea in the worldview transformations of the modern world. Theoretical basis. Historical, analytical, and hermeneutic methods became fundamental for achieving the goal. The study is based on Kant’s works, as well as on the works of modern researchers of his ideological heritage. Originality. The analysis shows that the idea of the Self-made-man, which originated in the ancient world and gradually spread in the Western culture of the Middle Ages, early Modernism, and especially the Enlightenment, receives significant additional impulses in the context of Kant’s rethinking of the metaphysical foundations in the theory of knowledge and morality. Perhaps, the systematic theoretical substantiation of people’s abilities to use their own mind, their intellectual, and therefore moral autonomy, and freedom of will as the fundamental principles of personal Self-determination and Self-realization became the most important consequence of this rethinking. This, in turn, became the theoretical and moral-legal basis for further legitimization in the modern and postmodern world of the ideal of a person who creates oneself. Conclusions. The importance of Kant’s philosophy in the context of idea generation of the self-made man is hard to overestimate. It is entirely imbued with a leitmotif appeal to the individual to have the courage to use his/her own mind, to be independent and self-sufficient in assessments, choices, and actions, and therefore also responsible for their consequences, in the end, to be primarily an end, not a means. Thanks to this, a person, according to Hegel, finds an unconditionally strong and stable center in oneself. In fact, by strengthening the position of human-centric philosophy, as well as the moral and legal foundations of liberal humanism, Kant’s ideas provided further ideological legitimation in the orientation of an objectively growing individual towards actively placing Self-reliance and Personal responsibility on one’s own destiny as the key principles of the Self-made-man concept.
References
Allison, H. E. (2011). Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford University Press. (in English)
DiCenso, J. J. (2020). On Allen W. Wood’s Kant and Religion. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, (12), 568-591. (in English)
Hösle, V. (2003). Praktische Philosophie in der modernen Welt (A. Yermolenko, Trans.). Kyiv: Libra. (in Ukrainian)
Kant, I. (1994). Ideya vseobshchey istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane. In Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh: Traktaty i stati (1784-1796) (Vol. 1, pp. 79-123). Moscow: Izdatelskaya firma AO "Kami". (in German and Russian)
Kant, I. (2004). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (I. Burkovskyi, Trans.). Kyiv: Yunivers. (in Ukrainian)
Kant, I. (2005). Osnovanie metafiziki nravov. In Lektsii po etike. Moscow: Respublika. (in Russian)
Kant, I. (2022). Krytyka syly sudzhennia (V. Terletskyi, Trans.). Kyiv: Tempora. (in Ukrainian)
Korkh, O. M., & Antonova, V. Y. (2023). Metaphysical and Anthropological Principles of the Self-Made-Man Idea in Western Philosophy of the 17th Century. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (23), 95-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i23.283610 (in English)
Kozlovskyi, V. (2023). Kantova antropolohiia: Dzherela. Konsteliatsii. Modeli. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. (in Ukrainian)
Malivskyi, A. M., & Yakymchuk, O. I. (2022). Pre-Critical Kant on the Anthropological Basis of the Enlightenment Project. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (22), 141-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i22.271374 (in English)
McLear, C. (2019). On the Transcendental Freedom of the Intellect. Lincoln: University of Nebraska. (in English)
Murchadha, F. (2022). The Formation of the Modern Self: Reason, Happiness and the Passions from Montaigne to Kant. Bloomsbury Academic. (in English)
Taylor, C. (2013). Sekuliarna doba (Vol. 1). Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. (in Ukrainian)
Yermolenko, A. (2020). Interiorization of intersubjectivity in the "I"-concept and co-responsibility in transcendental pragmatics. Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought), (6), 6-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2020.06.006 (in Ukrainian)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).