Recreational Space as the Embodiment of the Garden of Eden Archetype

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307627

Keywords:

human, Garden of Eden, archetype, redemption of sinfulness, ecological paradigm, recreational space, landscape theories of urban planning

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to research the spiritual basis and motivation of human activity in the relationships between humans and the natural environment to create various forms of recreational spaces in the socio-cultural context of the post-industrial era. Theoretical basis. The research is based on the approach of analytical psychology by C. Jung, who identified the archetypes of the collective unconscious. These archetypes help overcome the limitations of the functional and pragmatic approach, which is focused on mere survival. They make sense and provide values in the relationship between humans and nature. Originality. The article evaluates how archetypal images of the collective unconscious, with the help of the Garden of Eden image in the socio-cultural context of European civilization, influence the recreational space in contemporary urban environments. The novelty of the work is also in the interdisciplinary approach, integrating knowledge from various fields such as philosophy, sociology, cultural studies, analytical psychology, and urban planning, which contributes to the profound understanding of complex socio-cultural processes. This paradigm emphasizes the interconnection and interdependence, adaptability, and co-evolution of society and nature, as well as requires the interdisciplinary methodological approach. Additionally, the article presents a fresh perspective on nature and its elements in terms of their importance both for individuals and society. Conclusions. The article investigates the socio-cultural factors that evoke the interest of man and society in natural factors as a recreational resource and determine the latest theoretical approaches to their use. Various recreational activities to create a renewed space provide a person with a full physical, socio-psychological and cognitive development. The humanization of the natural environment becomes the embodiment of the collective memory and history of mankind. The recreational space symbolizes spiritual values, so it is transformed from physical to socio-cultural and provides theoretical approaches to its implementation in modern urban planning practices.

References

Adorno, T. (1951). Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. Verso. (in English)

El-Baghdadi, O., & Desha, C. (2017). Conceptualising a biophilic services model for urban areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 27, 399-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.016 (in English)

Goffman, E. (1966). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. Free Press. (in English)

Harris, M. (2001). Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. AltaMira Press. (in English)

Heidegger, M. (1954). Building, Dwelling, Thinking. Brill Sense. (in English)

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (G. S. Noerr, Ed., E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (in English)

Li, F., Wang, R., Paulussen, J., & Liu, X. (2005). Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72(4), 325-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04.002 (in English)

Nassauer, J. I. (2012). Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(3), 221-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.014 (in English)

Nikolenko, О. I., Hamma, Т. V., Zarichanska, L. O., Nesenchuk, О. L., & Zinchuk, Т. О. (2022). Recreation as a socio-cultural phenomenon, its varieties and characteristics. Rehabilitation and Recreation, (12), 144-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1795.2022.12.19 (in Ukrainian)

Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, With a New Preface and Appendix. Harvard University Press. (in English)

Shivers, J. S. (1981). Leisure and Recreation Concepts: A Critical Analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. (in English)

Smith, G. R. (2015). Phytoremediation-by-design: community-scale landscape systems design for healthy communities. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(5), 413-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1079276 (in English)

Steiner, F. (2014). Frontiers in urban ecological design and planning research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 304-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.023 (in English)

Wu, J. (2008). Making the Case for Landscape Ecology: An Effective Approach to Urban Sustainability. Landscape Journal, 27(1), 41-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.27.1.41 (in English)

Zowisło, M. (2010). Leisure as a Category of Culture, Philosophy and Recreation. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 50(1), 66-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10141-010-0024-y (in English)

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Merylova, I. O., & Sokolova, K. V. (2024). Recreational Space as the Embodiment of the Garden of Eden Archetype. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (25), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307627

Issue

Section

SOCIAL ASPECT OF HUMAN BEING