The Order and Chaos in Human Relationships: Objective Grounds and the Ways of Harmonization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307610Keywords:
human, universe, society, order and chaos, information, regulation of human relationshipsAbstract
Purpose. This article aims to provide a philosophical analysis of disharmonious relations between people in society, to reveal the causes of existing conflicts and to find ways to reduce the manifestations of chaos in human relations. Theoretical basis of the article is socio-cultural anthropology, the principles of the unity of the historical and logical, the ascent from the abstract to the concrete, the unity of analysis and synthesis. To solve the tasks set, authors also used the principles of objectivity, systematicity, and comprehensive development. Originality. The article goes beyond one-sided views on the relationship between people in society, reveals the causes of existing conflicts from a philosophical perspective and searches for ways to reduce chaosogenic manifestations in society. It is assumed that chaos and order in human relations arise not only due to the contradictory interaction between the fundamental components of the Universe – matter and energy, but also due to a lack of understanding of the laws of information use. Therefore, without the discovery and rational use of the basic laws and principles governing the functioning of information in the Universe, it is impossible to overcome chaos in human relations. Conclusions. Given the profound impact of information on human relations, it is possible to help reduce the manifestations of chaos in human relationships. The proper handling of information, along with the rational use of matter and energy, is crucial for overcoming the current state of disharmony and creating a more favourable and orderly future for humanity. Thus, the vector of harmonisation of human relations lies in the plane of comprehensive knowledge of mass-energy and information processes occurring in the Universe, focusing not on subjective, ill-considered short-term goals, but submitting to them for consistent inclusion in these processes.
References
Alexander, L. (2005). The Legal Enforcement of Morality. In R. G. Frey & C. Heath Wellman (Eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics (pp. 128-141). Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996621.ch10 (in English)
Bushev, M. (1994). Chaos, Order, Symmetry. In Synergetics: Chaos, Order, Self-Organization (pp. 93-113). World Scientific Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814354578_0006 (in English)
Busov, S., Zobova, M., & Rodukov, A. (2020). Ideology and moral: relationship of norm and ideal in the light of synergetic philosophy of history. E3S Web of Conferences, 210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021016031 (in English)
Johansen, T. K. (2019). The Timaeus on the Principles of Cosmology. In G. Fine (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato (pp. 286-307). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190639730.013.14 (in English)
Khitaryan, D., Stepanyan, L., Oganyan, K., Ogorodnikov, V., & Oganyan, K. (2022). Social Synergetics: Synergetic Historicism and Humanism. Wisdom, 23(3), 59-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v23i3.717 (in English)
Lorenz, K. (2021). On Aggression. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003209249 (in English)
Marx, K. (2010). The Revolutions of 1848: Political Writings. Verso Books. (in English)
Pross, A. (2011). Toward a general theory of evolution: Extending Darwinian theory to inanimate matter. Journal of Systems Chemistry, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-2208-2-1 (in English)
Shapoval, V. M., & Tolstov, I. V. (2021). Quo Vadis: Anthropological Dimension of the Modern Civilization Crisis. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (19), 23-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i19.235937 (in English)
Sklyarova, E. A. (2018). Transformation of the Western European culture style: the old order – the new order – modernity. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, (3), 141-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2018-3-7-141-149 (in Russian)
Spengler, O. (1993). Sunset of Europe. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)
Stern, R. (2001). Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203205044 (in English)
Stonier, T. (1990). Information Physics: An Introduction. In Information and the Internal Structure of the Universe (pp. 21-31). London: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3265-3_3 (in English)
Wilson, E. O. (2012). The Social Conquest of Earth. W. W. Norton & Company. (in English)
Zekrist, R., & Bakhtin, M. (2020). Sociocultural dynamics and information civilization as one of the vectors of the evolution of 21st century culture. E3S Web of Conferences, 210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021017033 (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).