Cultural-Anthropological Basis of Strong Constructivism in Social Cognition

O. N. Kubalskyi

doi:10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307595

Authors

O. N. Kubalskyi Dobrov Institute for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-3150

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307595

Keywords:

cultural anthropology, strong constructivism, fictionalism, realism, epistemic cultures, local epistemic practices

Abstract

Purpose. This article is aimed at identifying the cultural-anthropological limits of the applicability of strong constructivism in social cognition. Theoretical basis. The study of epistemic cultures, carried out by the modern German philosopher of science Karin Knorr Cetina, gave reasons to rethink the role of cultural anthropology as a methodological basis of strong constructivism not only for scientific cognition, but also for educational practices, and perhaps also for some other social practices. An important role in identifying less successful versions of strong constructivism was played by the concept of fictionalism of the German philosopher Hans Veihinger, the Chilean biologists Humberto Maturán and Francisco Varela, and the German sociologist and philosopher Niklas Luhmann. Originality. Strong constructivism has broad prospects for use within cultural anthropology as an identification of the cultural foundations of human nature. Local research and educational practices are defined as a model for the formation of those social characteristics of their participants, which they themselves change through self-improvement. Strong constructivists involve the individual empirical experience of researchers, and also correct the inherited rules of scientific research as elements of research procedures and practices, thanks to which they achieve the creation of a common epistemic culture and the elimination of myths about the isolation of scientific cognition from the world. Conclusions. False ways of interpreting strong constructivism as fictionalism and as realism have been revealed. Fictionalism, as a methodology focused on the study of the contents of consciousness, loses the empirical experience of the world. Philosophical realism as positivism in the philosophy of science reduces the significance of scientific discoveries to confirmation of the laws of nature. Karin Knorr Cetina’s proposal to consider constructivism "on its own terms" appears not as a moderate compromise between these extremes, but as the only possible way to adequately reconcile the work of nature and the conscious activity of man. Such coordination takes place primarily in the creation of local epistemic cultures as a collective activity of researchers.

References

Bagnoli, C. (2021). Constructivism in Metaethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/constructivism-metaethics/ (in English)

Baudrillard, J. (1988). Simulacra and Simulations. In M. Poster (Ed.), Selected Writings (pp. 166-184). Stanford University Press. (in English)

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. (in English)

Boichenko, M. I., Shevchenko, Z. V., & Pituley, V. V. (2019). The Role of Biological and Social Factors in Determining Gender Identity. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (15), 11-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i15.169468 (in English)

Danylova, T. V. (2022). Social Forecasting and Elusive Reality: Our World as a Social Construct. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (22), 67-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i22.271332 (in English)

Do, H.-N., Do, B. N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2023). 3How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? The Design Science Approach. Heliyon, 9(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22862 (in English)

Dombrovszski, A. (2017). Towards a New Theory of Modal Fictionalism. Ostium, 13(4). Retrieved from https://ostium.sk/language/sk/towards-a-new-theory-of-modal-fictionalism/ (in English)

Downes, S. M. (1998). Constructivism. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-Q017-1 (in English)

Jahan, I., & Alam, A. (2022). Studies Related to Effect of Constructivist Approach on Different Variables: An Analysis. Bhartiyam International Journal of Education & Research, 11(4), 32-45. Retrieved from http://www.gangainstituteofeducation.com/MD.%20AFROZ.pdf (in English)

Jaspers, K. (1932). Philosophie: Existenzerhellung (Vol. 2). Springer. (in German)

Khmil, V. V., & Popovych, I. S. (2019). Philosophical and Psychological Dimensions of Social Expectations of Personality. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (16), 55-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.187540 (in English)

Knorr Cetina, K. (1991). Epistemic Cultures: Forms of Reason in Science. History of Political Economy, 23(1), 105-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-23-1-105 (in English)

Knorr Cetina, K. (1993). Strong Constructivism – from a Sociologist’s Point of View: A Personal Addendum to Sismondo’s Paper. Social Studies of Science, 23(3), 555-563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312793023003005 (in English)

Latour, B. (2003). The Promises of Constructivism. In D. Ihde & E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality (pp. 27-46). Indiana University Press. (in English)

Luhmann, N. (1988). Erkenntnis als Konstruktion. Bern: Benteli Verlag. (in German)

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston: Shambhala. (in English)

Milutinović, J. (2015). Critical constructivism: Concept and possibillities of its application in the field of education. Nastava i vaspitanje, 64(3), 437-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas1503437M (in Serbian)

Molokova, O. V. (2014). Social constructivism as a solution to rationality in postnonclassical epistemology. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (6), 133-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2014/35886 (in Russian)

Monton, B., & Mohler, C. (2021). Constructive Empiricism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/constructive-empiricism/ (in English)

Najar, I. A., Aslam, T., Yousuf, M., & Bhat, I. A. (2023). Unpacking Constructive based Pedagogies. Samdarshi, 16(5), 624-629. (in English)

Perkowska-Klejman, A., & Górka-Strzałkowska, A. (2023). Learning Environment in the Optics of Critical Constructivism. Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny, 42(2), 7-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2023.42.2.7-21 (in English)

Roy, S., & Saha, B. (2021). Essence of Social Constructivist Approach in Teaching-Learning Scenario and Revolving Questions on Its Relevance in Technological Era. IAR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 72-76. (in English)

Saleem, A., Kausar, H., & Deeba, F. (2021). Social Constructivism: A New Paradigm in Teaching and Learning Environment. Perennial Journal of History, 2(2), 403-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v2i2.86 (in English)

Shevchenko, Z. V., & Fialko, N. A. (2022). The normativity of multiple social identity: from motivation to legitimacy. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (22), 58-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i22.271328 (in English)

Vacek, M. (2018). Call for Papers: Fictionalism as an (In)Appropriate Philosophical Methodology. Organon F, 25(1), 139-140. (in English)

Vaihinger, H. (1922). Die Philosophie des Als Ob: System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus. Leipzig: Felix Meiner. (in German)

Williams, A. (2024). Constructivism in Political Philosophy. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/constructivism-political/ (in English)