Empathy and Self-Empathy in the Anthropological Dimension of Modernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307589Keywords:
empathy, self-empathy, self-exploration of the spiritual, introsubjectivity, altruism, atopyAbstract
Purpose. In the article, the author questions rethinking the phenomena of empathy and self-empathy as modes of self-understanding of humanity and the inner intention to self-exploration of human spirituality. Theoretical basis. The research is based on the phenomenological dimension of modern anthropology and axiology. Originality. The change of the traditional intersubjective approach in the understanding of empathy to an introsubjective one and the affirmation of self-empathy as one of the defining existences in human beings, which is adjusted by the altruism-egoism value scale and forms the skills of unconditional empathic action towards the Other as a mode of self-exploration in the spiritual essence of a person are argued. Conclusions. The commonplace in a wide palette of research views on empathy is the construct for the Self – Other disposition and the intersubjective approach emphasizing the object of empathy. Transformation of the intention vector of empathic consciousness from the object to the subject of empathic action opens up deep possibilities of spiritual improvement as a way of self-awareness in the human essence. The transformation of the intention vector of empathic consciousness from intersubjective (I in the Other) to introsubjective (I through the Other) has the potential for spiritual development according to the altruism-egoism value scale. Empathy as an introsubjective position of self-exploration is inseparably connected with self-empathy, which in the mutual integration of its three main components – benevolence towards oneself, reflexivity towards one’s own experience and a tendency to understand one’s fate as common to all mankind – forms an important regulator of self-understanding of a person’s spiritual potential and the possibility of the practical extrapolation for these skills to an empathic way of communication at all levels of anthropo-being. Anthropological accentuation on the inner essence and meanings of human existence is carried out through intuition and self-altruism as the fading of pragmatic interest in the socially conditioned Self (Ego) and immersion in the essential Self – the bearer of the universal spiritual in a person. Self-empathy is considered in the context of the ideas of Stoicism as a deep self-immersion in the human essence and sensitivity to immediate emotional internal states, as a construct of emotional intelligence and a way of realizing individual uniqueness in the context of the metamodern concept of atopy. Self-empathy is defined as one of the key existences in human beings, which forms the skill of altruistic (unconditional) implementation of empathy.
References
Barnard, L. K., & Curry, J. F. (2011). Self-Compassion: Conceptualizations, Correlates, & Interventions. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 289-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025754 (in English)
Batson, C. D. (2009). These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (pp. 3-16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002 (in English)
Bloom, P. (2018). Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. New York: Ecco book. (in English)
Bourbon, M. (2019). Penser l’individu. Genèse stoïcienne de la subjectivité. Turnhout: Brepols. (in French)
Breithaupt, F. (2019). The Dark Sides of Empathy (A. B. B. Hamilton, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501735608 (in English)
Charmaz, K. (1980). The social construction of self-pity in the chronically ill. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in Symbolic Interaction (Vol. 3, pp. 123-145). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. (in English)
Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A Review of the Concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466 (in English)
Dovidio, J. F., Johnson, J. D., Gaertner, S. L., Pearson, A. R., Saguy, T., & Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2010). Empathy and intergroup relations. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial Motives, Emotions, and Behavior: The Better Angels of Our Nature (pp. 393-408). American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-020 (in English)
Foucault, M. (2000). Histoire de la sexualite: Le souci de soi (I. Donchenko, Trans., Vol. 3). Kharkiv: OKO. (in Ukrainian)
Hansen, J. M., & Roald, T. (2022). Aesthetic Empathy: An Investigation in Phenomenological Psychology of Visual Art Experiences. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 53(1), 25-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-20221397 (in English)
Heyes, C. (2018). Empathy is not in our genes. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 95, 499-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.001 (in English)
Ingarden, R. (1971). O poznawaniu cudzych stanów psychicznych. In U podstaw teorii poznania (pp. 407-427). Warszawa: PWN. (in Polish)
Leary, M. R., Tate, E. B., Adams, C. E., Batts Allen, A., & Hancock, J. (2007). Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events: The implications of treating oneself kindly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 887-904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.887 (in English)
Marcus Aurelius. (2018). Naodyntsi z soboiu (R. Paranko, Trans.). Lviv: Apriori. (in Ukrainian)
Neff, K. (2003). Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude Toward Oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032 (in English)
Neff, K. D., & Vonk, R. (2009). Self-Compassion Versus Global Self-Esteem: Two Different Ways of Relating to Oneself. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 23-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.x (in English)
Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y.-P., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, Achievement Goals, and Coping with Academic Failure. Self and Identity, 4(3), 263-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000317 (in English)
Nelson, D. W., & Baumgarte, R. (2004). Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings Reduce Empathic Responding. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 391-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02553.x (in English)
Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840715 (in English)
Pigliucci, M. (2017). How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life. New York, NY: Basic Books. (in English)
Pizzolante, M., Chirico, A., Gaggioli, A., & Riva, G. (2022). Why and How Empathy Matters in Aesthetic Experiences. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(11), 762-764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.29260.ceu (in English)
Stein, E. (2018). Zum Problem der Einfühlung. München: E-Artnow. (in German)
Stephan, W. G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The Role of Empathy in Improving Intergroup Relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 729-743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00144 (in English)
Thirioux, B., Birault, F., & Jaafari, N. (2016). Empathy Is a Protective Factor of Burnout in Physicians: New Neuro-Phenomenological Hypotheses Regarding Empathy and Sympathy in Care Relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00763 (in English)
Vermeulen, T., & van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v2i0.5677 (in English)
Vescio, T. K., Hewstone, M., Crisp, R. J., & Rubin, J. M. (1999). Perceiving and Responding to Multiply Categorizable Individuals: Cognitive Processes and Affective Intergroup Bias. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social Identity and Social Cognition (pp. 111-140). Oxford: Blackwell. (in English)
Zhou, Q., Eisenberg, N., & Valiente, C. (2019). Empathy. In M. W. Gallagher & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (2nd ed., pp. 249-266). American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000138-016 (in English)
Zhou, Q., Valiente, C., & Eisenberg, N. (2003). Empathy and its measurement. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 269-284). American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10612-017 (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).