The Role of Reflexive Identity in the Age of Civilizational Transformations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i22.271326

Keywords:

civilizational transformation, stages of civilization development, level of personality development, identity, reflexive identity, double reflection, network identity

Abstract

Purpose. The article highlights, on the one hand, the impact of the potential of a developed reflective identity on the processes of civilizational transformations, and on the other hand, the role of the transformational processes of a civilizational scale in the formation of a new type of reflective identity. Acute crisis processes in social development, which humanity has faced so far, in particular after 24.02.2022, indicate the beginning of a radical civilizational transformation. Therefore, in the article, it is necessary to find out with the help of which mental, organizational and personal resources humanity can move to a more developed level of civilization without much loss. It is also necessary to show the importance of the philosophical understanding of reality in the formation of reflective identity because reflection has been the basic method of philosophy since its appearance. Theoretical basis. There is an understanding of the inextricable connection between the level of development of civilization and the level of reflective development of the individual fixed in a certain type of identity: a more historically developed stage of civilization corresponds to a more complex type of identity with multi-level reflection. At the same time, achieving a higher level of civilizational development is possible only under the condition of constructing a more complex and multi-level reflexive identity. Originality. It consists in establishing that the mental-cognitive mechanisms of reflection during the development of civilization passed through the stages of 1) reflexive forms of "the Axial Age", fixed in the corresponding forms of moral, logical, theological, political, etc. culture since the era of Ancient society; 2) reflexive forms of the Modern era with an emphasis on the inner world of man, the emergence of the reflective division into subject and object of knowledge as an essential feature of epistemology, as well as the formation of a modern type of identity; 3) the dual reflection of the post-industrial society and the Second Modern era, the mechanisms of which contribute to the formation of an active and self-sufficient network society and network crowdfunding economy. In this regard, at various stages of the development of civilization, in accordance with certain reflexive mechanisms, the corresponding types of identity are formed: 1) the basic identity of a person determined by his primary socialization; 2) reflective identity which is associated with the acquired cultural potential of a person and the opportunity to consciously choose special features of one’s own identity, and 3) identity which is associated with the existence in a given social culture of a mechanism of double reflection, which allows not only to make a valuable choice of the trajectory of development own identity but also to construct it. Conclusions. The aggravation of the identity problem in the modern world is the result of a civilizational crisis associated with the transformation of modern civilization, the technological basis of which is the introduction of renewable energy and artificial intelligence, as well as the development of network relationships in society. The hierarchical structure of modern identity is conditioned by the gradual historical and civilizational layering of the process of evolution of the reflexive component of identity. In each specific modern society, progressive civilizational transformations take place when an innovative type of identity coexisting with basic and modern types is activated and takes a leadership position. The growing role of network relations in society overcomes the identity crisis due to the reduction of social opposition and the harmonization of different aspects of the identity itself. Perceptible climatic changes and the destruction of the established security system in the world after 24.02.2022 made it obvious to the global thinking public that the world community is at the bifurcation point of a radical civilizational transformation.

References

Adams, M. (2003). The reflexive self and culture: a critique. The British Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 221-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131032000080212 (in English)

Azzano, L., & Carrara, M. (2021). The Grounding of Identities. Philosophia, 49(5), 1943-1952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00335-5 (in English)

Baumberger, C., & Brun, G. (2021). Reflective equilibrium and understanding. Synthese, 198(8), 7923-7947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02556-9 (in English)

Bontempo e Silva, L., & del Carmen Flores Macías, R. (2017). Reflexive Identity and Self-authorship Development on Psychology Students. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(2), 148-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v6n2a16 (in English)

Byrd, N. (2021). Reflective reasoning & philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 16(11), e12786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12786 (in English)

Deh, D., & Glođović, D. (2018). The Construction of Identity in Digital Space. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (16), 101-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i16.257 (in English)

De Jaegher, H. (2021). Loving and knowing: reflections for an engaged epistemology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 847-870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09634-5 (in English)

Haslanger, S. (2019). Cognition as a Social Skill. Australasian Philosophical Review, 3(1), 5-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2019.1705229 (in English)

Iversen, A. (2019). Reflexive positioning in identity work: When the shoe does not fit… Scandinavian Psychologist, 6, e8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15714/scandpsychol.6.e8 (in English)

Jaspers, K. (1965). The Origin and Goal of History. Yale University Press. (in English)

Liakh, V. V. (2021). Kryza identychnosti v dobu hlobalizatsii. In V. V. Liakh (Ed.), Kryza identychnosti: istoryko-filosofskyi kontekst (pp. 8-30). Kyiv: H. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)

Liakh, V., & Lukashenko, M. (2021). Space and dynamics of reflective thinking: disappointment vs eudaimonia. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, 1(1), 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2021.1.1.01 (in Ukrainian)

Muratova, I. A. (2019). Tekhnolohiia: universalizatsiia ta unifikatsiia sotsialnoho buttia. Kyiv: Milenium. (in Ukrainian)

Rechnitzer, T. (2022). Turning the trolley with reflective equilibrium. Synthese, 200(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03762-3 (in English)

Rifkin, J. (2011). The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. Palgrave Macmillan. (in English)

Vainikka, J. T. (2015). Reflexive Identity Narratives and Regional Legacies. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 106(5), 521-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12118 (in English)

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Lyubiviy, Y. V., & Samchuk, R. V. (2022). The Role of Reflexive Identity in the Age of Civilizational Transformations. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (22), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i22.271326

Issue

Section

SOCIAL ASPECT OF HUMAN BEING