Anthropological Aesthetics of Greek Antiquity as a Narrative of Philosophical Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i21.260340Keywords:
anthropological aesthetics of antiquity, natural body, social body, cultural body, epistemological subjectAbstract
Purpose. The article aims to define the philosophical narratives about the "beautiful human" of Greek antiquity in the coordinates of the triad of "natural", "social" and "cultural" body. Theoretical basis. When achieving this purpose, the author based on the conceptual provisions of the philosophical anthropology of Н. Plessner, in particular, concerning the attitude of a limited body to its limit as an empirical comprehension of a human him/herself and the world. Developing the position of the body as a socio-cultural phenomenon and proceeding from the definition of corporeality as a "transformed human body under the influence of social and cultural factors, which has socio-cultural meanings and performs certain socio-cultural functions" (I. Bykhovskaya) (transl. by O. G.), the triad of "natural", "social" and "cultural" body was used as a methodological basis to analyse the research object. Originality lies in the explication of the peculiarities of aesthetic and anthropological discourse in Ancient Greek philosophy, not only through the prism of the dichotomy of "soul" and "body", but also through the prism of the triad "natural", "social" and "cultural" body, allowing rethinking of the narratives concerning the "beautiful human" of the formation period of the European anthropological aesthetics in Antiquity. Conclusions. The anthropological aesthetics of Greek Antiquity is masculine aesthetics, the aesthetics of the male "cultural body". If a man is an epistemological subject, he is able, despite the ugliness and abomination of his natural body, to reach the level of the cultural body, the level of "personal existence of corporeality". As for the female corporeality, since the Ancient Greek philosophy does not provide the status of an epistemological subject for a woman, she remains at the level of "social body".
References
Baron, I. Z., Havercroft, J., Kamola, I., Koomen, J., Murphy, J., & Prichard, A. (2019). Liberal Pacification and the Phenomenology of Violence. International Studies Quarterly, 63(1), 199-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy060 (in English)
Bykhovskaya, I. M. (1998). Telesnost kak sotsiokulturnyy fenomen. In S. Y. Levit (Ed.), Kulturologiya: XX vek: Entsiklopediya (Vol. 2, pp. 248-249). St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga. (in Russian)
Carey, C. (Ed.). (2007). Lysiae Orationes cum Fragmentis (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. (in Greek)
Downing, L. (2019). Selfish Women. Routledge. (in English)
Furedi, F. (2019). The Emergence of the Self in History. In A. Kennedy & J. Panton (Eds.), From Self to Selfie: A Critique of Contemporary Forms of Alienation (pp. 13-26). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19194-8_2 (in English)
Isocrates. (2016). Helen (G. Norlin, Trans.). In Complete Works. Delphi Classics. (in English)
Lucian. (1967). Affairs of the Heart (Amores). In Soloecista. Lucius or The Ass. Amores. Halcyon. Demosthenes. Podagra. Ocypus. Cyniscus. Philopatris. Charidemus. Nero (M. D. MacLeod, Trans., pp. 148-236). Harvard University Press. (in English)
Plato. (1999). Hippii bilshyi (U. Holovach, Trans.). In Dialohy (2nd ed., pp. 81-107). Kyiv: Osnovy. (in Ukrainian)
Plato. (2018). Benket (U. Holovach, Trans., 2nd ed.). Lviv: Ukrainian Catholic University. (in Ukrainian)
Plessner, H. (2019). Levels of Organic Life and the Human: An Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology (M. Hyatt, Trans.). Fordham University Press. (in English)
Procter, L. (2021). I Am/We Are: Exploring the Online Self-Avatar Relationship. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 45(1), 45-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859920961041 (in English)
Stolyarov, A. A. (Trans.). (2007). Fragmenty rannikh stoikov: Khrisipp iz Sol. Eticheskie fragmenty (Vol. 3, Pt. 1). Moscow: Greko-latinskiy kabinet Y. A. Shichalina. (in Russian)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).