COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2014/25215Keywords:
philosophy of history, historical knowledge, historical anthropology, interdisciplinary approach, cognitive dynamicsAbstract
Purpose. The aim of this work is the intelligent reconstruction and the analysis of the various methodological approaches to cognitive areas of modern philosophy of history and determines their cognitive and academic relationships with conceptual terms of such branches of historical knowledge as historical anthropology. Methodology. Methodological tools of this work are such scientific approaches as methods of philosophy of science, interdisciplinary approach, methods of source and system analysis. Scientific novelty. Reproduced and analyzed was a number of methodological approaches inherent in the natural sciences and the social - the humanities. The latter, in accordance with the principles of interdisciplinary paradigm, is very widely applied by the modern philosophy of historical knowledge, in particular in the analysis of the historical process and its main elements: the mentality, attitudes and norms of socially significant and personal behavior of individuals and societies of the past. The influence of research on various historical and historical anthropological problems such concepts implanted in the methodology of modern philosophy of history scientific disciplines as chaos theory, synergetics, mathematical biology, ethnology, social psychology, etc. Focuses on intellectual connections are used in the philosophy of history, historical knowledge interdisciplinary methodology, theory and concepts of natural science and social - humanities. They are used to analyze and understand the complex and multifaceted historical events and processes. Conclusions. The result of the analysis of the cognitive dynamics applications in the philosophy of history of conceptual approaches of a very wide range of scientific disciplines has been the allocation of a number of phases of the mining process. Each of them has special logic - methodological and socio cultural characteristics ("Data"). Internal, cognitive science dynamics of this unity was not the aiming at the destruction of the previous intellectual tradition, but its deepening and updating on the basis of the implementation of more effective and diverse methodological approaches.References
Brown, D. E. Human nature and history [Text] / D. E. Brown // History and theory. – 1999. - № 38. – p. 138-157.
Domanska , E. I.I. Graham Theory of history in Drtega-i-Gasset «The dawn of historical reason» [Text] / E. Domanska // American historical rewiev. – 2000. - № 2. - p. 384.
Hamerow, T. S. M. Stanford The nature of historical knowelage [Text] / T. S. Hamerow // American historical rewiev. – 1990. - № 1. - p. 124.
Hall, Jh. R.P. Crotty when the histories collide: the development and impact of individualistic capitalistic capitalism [Text] / Jh. Hall // American historical rewiev. – 2004. - october. - p. 1193-1194.
Iggers , G . Jh. Farkenkopf Prophet of Decline: Spengler on world history and politics [Text] / G. Iggers // American historical rewiev. – 2002. - april. - p. 500-501.
Iggers , G . Historicism: the history and meaning of the term [Text] / G. Iggers // Journal of the history of ideas. - 1995. - vol. 56. - № 1. - p. 129-151.
Lindenfild, D. Causality, chaos theory and the of Weimar Republic: Commentary on Henry Turners «Thirty days to power» [Text] / D. Lindenfild // History and theory. - 1999. - № 38. - p. 281-289.
O`Sallivan, L. Leon Goldstein and the epistemology of historical knowelage [Text] / L. O`Sallivan // History and theory. - 2006. - № 45. - p. 204-228.
Pena, A. On the role of mathematical biology in contemporary historiography [Text] / A. Pena // History and theory. - 1999. - № 38. - p. 101-120.
Shermer, M. «Exorcising Lapla`s demon: chaos and antichaos history and metahistory» [Text] / M. Shermer // History and theory. - 1995. - № 34. - p. 59-83.
Williams , E. A. J. Hect the and of the soul: scientific Modernity, atheism and anthropology [Text] / E. A. Williams // American historical rewiev. – 2004. - october. - p. 1322-1323.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).