Analytical Anthropology of Peter Hacker

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i20.249601

Keywords:

Peter Hacker, Ludwig Wittgenstein, philosophical anthropology, ordinary language philosophy, neuroscience, human abilities, Cartesian dualism, neo-Aristotelism, holism

Abstract

Purpose. The article is an explication of the features of the anthropological teaching of Peter Hacker in the context of analytical philosophy with consideration to the context of European philosophy within the framework of the Oxford School of ordinary language philosophy. The theoretical basis of the research is determined by the latest research in the English-language analytical philosophical tradition, rethinking the place of anthropological problems in the system of philosophical knowledge. Originality. Referring to primary sources, we reconstructed the philosophical and anthropological teaching of Peter Hacker in the unity of its basic principles and theoretical and practical results. We determined philosophical origins of the key ideas of his philosophical anthropology and substantiated their originality, systematicity and logical argumentation. His philosophical position is defined as anthropological holism, synthesizing the reinterpreted ideas of Aristotle and Wittgenstein. Conclusions. Peter Hacker is the creator of the original version of Analytic Philosophical Anthropology. His anthropology is based on criticism of Cartesian dualism and physicalism, which underlie modern neurosciences and which he tries to overcome on the basis of Wittgenstein’s philosophical "logotherapy". The conceptual framework of his holistic anthropology is a rethought conceptual scheme of the Ordinary language philosophy. Hacker considers consciousness not as a separate mental reality, but one of the powers of human nature – an intellectual ability, which, along with emotional (passionate) and moral, belongs to a person as an integral socio-biological being. Asserting the free will of man, the Oxford thinker criticizes various forms of determinism, especially its most common form in modern science – neurobiological determinism, which is built on false philosophical foundations. This criticism allows the modern British philosopher to build an original, systematic and logically consistent anthropological concept that asserts the immutability of the highest human values – goodness, love and happiness.

References

Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Wiley-Blackwell. (in English)

Bennett, M., Dennett, D., Hacker, P., & Searle, J. (2007). Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language. New York: Columbia University Press. (in English)

Bazaluk, O., & Balinchenko, S. (2020). The Ethics Laws as a Basis for Building a Cosmic Civilization. The Sofia Republic. Philosophy and Cosmology, 24, 131-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/24/13 (in English)

Glock, H.-J. (2020). Minds, Brains, and Capacities: Situated Cognition and Neo-Aristotelianism. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 566385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566385 (in English)

Hacker, P. M. S. (2007). Human Nature: The Categorial Framework. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470692165 (in English)

Hacker, P. M. S. (2013). The Intellectual Powers: A Study of Human Nature. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118609033 (in English)

Hacker, P. M. S. (2017). The Passions: A Study of Human Nature. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118951866 (in English)

Hacker, P. M. S. (2021). The Moral Powers: A Study of Human Nature. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119657828 (in English)

Ladov, V. A. (2012). Vitgenshteyn i Khaker o yazyke oshchushcheniy. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 4(20), 135-140. (in Russian)

Ogleznev, V. V., & Surovtsev, V. A. (2017). Definition in analytical legal philosophy: P. Hacker versus H. Hart. Tomsk State University Journal, 421, 36-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/421/5 (in Russian)

Smit, H., & Hacker, P. (2020). Two conceptions of consciousness and why only the neo-Aristotelian one enables us to construct evolutionary explanations. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00591-y (in English)

Synytsia, A. S. (2017). Suchasna analitychna filosofiia: Vid prahmatyky movy do kontseptualizatsii svidomosti: Monohrafiia. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. (in Ukrainian)

Weigand, E. (2018). Dialogue: The key to pragmatics. In E. Weigand & I. Kecskes (Eds.), From Pragmatics to Dialogue (pp. 5-28). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.02wei (in English)

Downloads

Published

2021-12-28

How to Cite

Popov, V. Y., & Popova Е. V. (2021). Analytical Anthropology of Peter Hacker. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (20), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i20.249601

Issue

Section

ANTHROPOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY