The Co-Existential Educational Community and Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i20.249547Keywords:
human nature, human essence, education, co-existential community, sobornost, all-unity, culture, imaginationAbstract
Purpose. The article aims to comprehend the concept that has a serious anthropological meaning, – a "co-existential educational community" – which points at the real subject and object in the development of the educational reality, as well as to explicate its importance towards understanding the real way of addressing actually to the culture and its acquisition in the pedagogical process. Theoretical basis. To achieve this purpose, the method of categorical-reflexive analysis of texts and problems of real educational realities is used; this allows to involve of such philosophical concepts as "sobornost", "all-unity", "culture" and distinguish their anthropological meaning. Under this approach, philosophical categories are able to appear as internal dimensions of the essence in the educational process, rather than a certain matrix, for which one or another theoretical or practical construction is adjusted. Originality. The originality of the article lies in the actualization of philosophical content in "sobornost" and "all-unity" concepts for philosophical-educational discourse and in solving the question on the real way of entering culture (precisely in its potential that generates its own human in man) in the context of pedagogical communication. Conclusions. Addressing the idea of a co-existential educational community is able to oppose the widespread superficial notions of the so-called "educational environment" in the pedagogical and psychological literature and orient pedagogical theory and pedagogical practices on the real way of entering the individual into truly human forms of life. It is argued that the co-existential educational community can and should unfold not only "horizontally" (in space), but also "vertically" (in historical time), consciously integrating the high culture in itself as a culture of high. The authors emphasized the role of imagination in this process. Education can and should build co-existence with the culture of participants in pedagogical communication. It is with this approach that the education sector can emerge from the systemic crisis and actively oppose those trends in modern social life that increase alienation and depopulation.
References
Bakhurst, D. (2020). Teaching and Learning: Epistemic, Metaphysical and Ethical Dimensions–Introduction. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(2), 255-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12418 (in English)
Batishchev, G. S. (1997). Vvedenie v dialektiku tvorchestva. St. Petersburg: RGKhI. (in Russian)
Batishchev, G. S. (2015). Osobennosti kultury glubinnogo obshcheniya. In Izbrannye proizvedeniya (pp. 505-538). Almaty: Institut filosofii, politologii i religievedeniya KN MON RK. (in Russian)
Bloome, D., Beauchemin, F., Brady, J., Buescher, E., Kim, M., & Schey, R. (2018). Anthropology of Education, Anthropology in Education, and Anthropology for Education. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2140 (in English)
Butsyak, I. D. (2011). Tipologiya sotsialnykh svyazey v kulture G. S. Batishcheva i sposob postroeniya pedagogicheskogo prostranstva. Nauka i obrazovanie v sovremennom mire: Vol. 3: Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnykh nauchno-prakticheskikh konferentsiy, April, 2010, April, 2011, Ust-Kamenogorsk, 14-28. (in Russian)
Frank, S. L. (1992). Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva: Vvedenie v sotsialnuyu filosofiyu (pp. 13-146). Moscow: Respublika. (in Russian)
Ilyenkov, E. V. (2006). Ob idolakh i idealakh (2nd ed.). Kyiv: Chas-Krok. (in Russian)
Kern, A. (2020). Human Life, Rationality and Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(2), 268-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12412 (in English)
Kobylchenko, V. (2014). Psychological Health and Wellbeing of Children with Psychophysical Development Disabilities as Urgent Problem of Special Psychology. Osvita osib z osoblyvymy potrebamy: shliakhy rozbudovy, 5, 65-73. (in Ukrainian)
Limonchenko, V. (2014). Opyt filosofskoy analitiki antropologicheskogo diskursa v Pravoslavii: Monografiya. Drohobych: Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. (in Russian)
Lobastov, G. V. (2014). Filosofsko-psikhologicheskie problemy pedagogiki: Monografiya. Mendeleevo: FGUP "VNIIFTRI". (in Russian)
Mikhaylov, F. T. (2001a). Filosofiya obrazovaniya: ee vozmozhnosti i perspektivy. In Izbrannoe (pp. 452-512). Moscow: Indrik. (in Russian)
Mikhaylov, F. T. (2001b). Kulturologiya kak osnovanie obshchego chelovekovedeniya. In Izbrannoe (pp. 257-390). Moscow: Indrik. (in Russian)
Mikhaylov, F. T. (2003). Samoopredelenie kultury. Filosofskiy poisk. Moscow: Indrik. (in Russian)
Revasevych, I. (2003). Obhruntuvannia psykholohichnoi kontseptsii osobystisnoi adaptovanosti za modulno-rozvyvalnoi orhsystemy. Psychology & Society, 4(14), 96-109. (in Ukrainian)
Rödl, S. (2020). Teaching, Freedom and the Human Individual. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(2), 290-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12415 (in English)
Slobodchikov, V. I. (1999). Paradigmy razvitiya sovremennoy psikhologii i obrazovaniya. Retrieved from http://charko.narod.ru/tekst/alm3/slob.html (in Russian)
Slobodchikov, V. I. (2004). Bez dukhovnoy sostavlyayushchey ne ponyat cheloveka. Retrieved from http://www.pravoslavie.ru/4560.html (in Russian)
Slobodchikov, V. I. (2010). Co-being Educational Community – Source of Development and the Subject of Education. Uchenye zapiski. Seriya Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 3(2), 3-8. (in Russian)
Slobodchikov, V. I., & Isaev, Y. I. (1998). Antropologicheskiy printsip v psikhologii razvitiya. Retrieved from http://library.by/portalus/modules/psychology/readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1107593635&archive=1120045907&start_from=&ucat=27& (in Russian)
Soloviev, V. S. (1990a). Krasota v prirode. In Sochineniya (Vol. 1, pp. 351-389). Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)
Soloviev, V. S. (1990b). Pervyy shag k polozhitelnoy estetike. In Sochineniya (Vol. 2, pp. 548-555). Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)
Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2019). Out of Love for Some-Thing: An Ontological Exploration of the Roots of Teaching with Arendt, Badiou and Scheler. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53(3), 518-530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12375 (in English)
Voznyak, V. (2008). Spivvidnoshennia rozsudku i rozumu yak filosofsko-pedahohichna problema: Monohrafiia. Drohobych: Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. (in Ukrainian)
Voznyak, V. (2014). In search of "the third subject" of educational process. The Kazakh-American Free University Academic Journal, 6, 109-116. (in English)
Voznyak, V. S., & Lipin, N. V. (2020). Education like breach between past and future. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 17, 98-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i17.206722 (in English)
Yushchenko, I. M. (2018). Psychological safety as a conditions of formation of subjectivity of the child. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series "Psychological Sciences", 3(1), 153-158. (in Ukrainian)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
