Age Discrimination as a Threat to the Anthropological Absolute of Human Being (Using the Pandemic Crisis as an Example)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i20.249525Keywords:
pandemic, COVID-19, anthropological area, human existence, human rights, civil society, the state, anthropological crisisAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the anthropological and socio-philosophical dimensions of human existence of the older age group given the challenges of pandemic threats caused by COVID-19. To this end, it is planned to solve a number of tasks, among which one should distinguish the following: 1) to investigate the manifestations of age discrimination in the context of the social and labor areas of human existence; 2) to focus on the asymmetry of the behavior of society and the state relative to persons of the older age group in the field of healthcare in the context of a pandemic crisis; 3) to represent the anthropological features of changes in the socialization and activity of older people under the current conditions of globalization-pandemic challenges. Theoretical basis. Despite such a broad representation of the age-related issue in public relations, there are still no practical guarantees that would apply to discriminatory aspects of older age groups in various areas of their manifestation. The synergistic evolution of social reality requires substantive analysis of the issue under the current conditions for the transformation of social life, which is affected by globalization crises caused by the pandemic threats of COVID-19. Originality. The stereotypical assumptions underlying legal policy and established social relations are based solely on the application of chronological age. The novelty is in justifying an individual approach to the elderly through the personification of the personal characteristics of a person. The study of anthropological and socio-philosophical dimensions of the existence of a person of the older age group in the face of the challenges of pandemic threats caused by COVID-19 has made it possible to analyze the destructive nature of age discrimination in the context of the social and labor areas of human existence. As well as focus on the asymmetry of the behavior of society and the state in relation to these persons in the field of health care, and emphasize the anthropological features of changes in the socialization and human activity under the current conditions of globalization-pandemic challenges. Conclusions. External threats to human existence call for special attention to the implementation and protection of human rights, freedoms, individual freedoms, and identity. Pandemic threats have transformed all dimensions of human existence, especially for those groups of society that are less socially protected. The pandemic crisis has created additional grounds for discrimination against older people in various areas of human existence. Equalization of persons by age without personifying the personal characteristics of an individual is discrimination on an age basis, which violates the principles of democracy and humanism in the society, leads to stigmatization of the person, is the cause of the anthropological crisis of a person.
References
Abrams, D., Russell, P. S., Vauclair, C.-M., & Swift, H. J. (2011). Grey Matters – A Survey of Ageism across Europe: EU briefing and policy recommendations. Age UK. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/10635082.pdf (in English)
Accius, J., & Suh, J. Y. (2020). The economic impact of age discrimination: How discriminating against older workers could cost the US economy $850 billion. AARP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26419/int.00042.003 (in English)
Akinola, S. (2020). COVID-19 has worsened ageism. Here’s how to help older adults thrive. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/10/covid-19-has-worsened-ageism-here-s-how-to-help-older-adults-thrive/ (in English)
Armitage, R., & Nellums, L. B. (2020). COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5), e256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30061-x (in English)
Bazaluk, O. (2021). The Sophia Republic: The Special Theory of Education. Philosophy and Cosmology, 26, 62-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/26/5 (in English)
BMA. (2020). COVID-19: retired doctors returning to work. Retrieved from https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/covid-19/returning-to-the-nhs-or-starting-a-new-role/covid-19-retired-doctors-returning-to-work (in English)
Brynjolfsson, E., Horton, J., Ozimek, A., Rock, D., Sharma, G., & Ye, H. Y. T. (2020). COVID-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at US Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Retrieved from https://john-joseph-horton.com/papers/remote_work.pdf (in English)
BSG. (2020). Statement from the President and Members of the National Executive Committee of the British Society of Gerontology on COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.britishgerontology.org/publications/bsg-statements-on-covid-19/statement-one (in English)
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2020). Pro zapobihannia poshyrenniu na terytorii Ukrainy hostroi respiratornoi khvoroby COVID-19, sprychynenoi koronavirusom SARS-CoV-2. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/211-2020-%D0%BF#Text (in Ukrainian)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). COVID-19 Risks and Vaccine Information for Older Adults. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/older-adults.html (in English)
Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. (2000). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32000L0078 (in English)
Directorate-General for Communication. (2019). Special Eurobarometer 493: Discrimination in the EU (including LGBTI). Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S2251_91_4_493_ENG (in English)
European Commission. (2011). Demography Report 2010. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical-books/-/ke-et-10-001
European Commission. (2020). The European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eip-aha (in English)
Furunes, T., & Mykletun, R. J. (2010). Age discrimination in the workplace: Validation of the Nordic Age Discrimination Scale (NADS). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 23-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00738.x (in English)
Global Future Council on Longevity. (2020). COVID and Longer Lives: Combating ageism and creating solutions. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Combating_ageism_and_creating_solutions_2020.pdf (in English)
Hargreaves, E., Quick, L., & Buchanan, D. (2021). 'I got rejected': investigating the status of 'low-attaining' children in primary-schooling. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(1), 79-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1689408 (in English)
Harper, S. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic and Older Adults: Institutionalised Ageism or Pragmatic Policy? Journal of Population Ageing, 13(4), 419-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-020-09320-4 (in English)
Jimenez-Sotomayor, M. R., Gomez-Moreno, C., & Soto-Perez-de-Celis, E. (2020). Coronavirus, Ageism, and Twitter: An Evaluation of Tweets about Older Adults and COVID-19. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68(8), 1661-1665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16508 (in English)
Kapustin, A. Y. (Ed.). (2003). Diskriminatsiya vne zakona: Sbornik dokumentov. Moscow: Yurist. (in Russian)
Kluge, H. H. P. (2020). Statement – Older people are at highest risk from COVID-19, but all must act to prevent community spread. WHO. Retrieved from https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/statements/statement-older-people-are-at-highest-risk-from-covid-19,-but-all-must-act-to-prevent-community-spread (in English)
Marsh, J. (2020). In one day, 1,000 NYC doctors and nurses enlist to battle coronavirus. Retrieved from https://nypost.com/2020/03/18/in-one-day-1000-nyc-doctors-and-nurses-enlist-to-battle-coronavirus/ (in English)
Nelson, T. D. (2016). Promoting healthy aging by confronting ageism. American Psychologist, 71(4), 276-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040221 (in English)
O’Shea, D. (2020). Principles in the COVID-WORLD. Irish Gerontological Society. Retrieved from https://www.irishgerontology.com/news/latest-news/principles-covid-world (in English)
Skipper, A., & Rose, D. (2020). #BoomerRemover: COVID-19, Ageism, and the Intergenerational Twitter Response. Innovation in Aging, 4(Supplement_1), 931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3414 (in English)
Spanish Doctors Are Forced to Choose Who to Let Die. (2020). Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-25/spanish-doctors-forced-to-choose-who-to-let-die-from-coronavirus (in English)
Terrell, K. (2020). Unemployment’s Toll on Older Workers Is Worst in Half a Century. AARP. Retrieved from https://www.aarp.org/work/working-at-50-plus/info-2020/pandemic-unemployment-older-workers/ (in English)
Тhe Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. (1967). Retrieved from https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/age-discrimination-employment-act-1967 (in English)
Verel, P. (2020). Professor’s Research Highlights Last Acceptable Prejudice. Retrieved from https://news.fordham.edu/politics-and-society/professors-research-highlights-last-acceptable-prejudice (in English)
Yang-Huang, J., Grieken, A. van, You, Y., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Steegers, E. A., Duijts, L., … & Raat, H. (2021). Changes in Family Poverty Status and Child Health. Pediatrics, 147(4), e2020016717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-016717 (in English)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).