ANTHROPOCENTRIC DIMENSIONS OF UKRAINIAN CULTURE (IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ARCHETYPE OF THE WISE OLD MAN)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i18.221383Keywords:
anthropocentrism, identity, transcendent, Ukrainian culture, the archetype of the Wise Old Man, prototype, transformationAbstract
Purpose. Philosophy of culture is an extremely multifaceted field, which includes the anthropological segment as well. In particular, we can talk about the role of man (personality) in cultural progress in a particular period of development of the society. To some extent, this problem may also apply to the theory of archetypes, which is rapidly developing today, being used not only in philosophy but also in other fields, deeply penetrated into the methodology of humanities knowledge. Therefore, we used interdisciplinary tools for this study. The purpose of this work is to study the influence of personality on the development of Ukrainian culture in a global, comprehensive dimension, based on the experience and works of famous figures that carried out cultural activities in a certain historical period. In this case, we can appeal to the archetype of the Wise Old Man, which contains a set of permanent features (ordinary and transcendent) that connect its projections with both the "foretype" and at the same time the "accumulation" of experience. Theoretical basis. Based on the work of famous researchers in the field of philosophy, anthropology, analytical psychology, ethnophilosophy (C. Jung, Z. Freud, M. Scheler, F. Nietzsche, F. Schelling, W. Eco, G. Gachev, A. Bolshakova, L. Koshetarova, M. Eliade, O. Kyryliuk, S. Krymsky, V. Lychkovakh, T. Shestopalova, M. Nesteleev, Z. Bosyk, etc.), the authors note the insufficient elaboration of the topic regarding the distinction of anthropological (including anthropocentric) dimensions of different cultural periods of Ukraine in chronological order. Originality. The authors of the article prove that the continuity of the accumulation of anthropocentric features in individuals gives them transcendence, elevate to the archetype of the Wise Old Man, which can be perceived as a universal process against the ethnic development background. Conclusions. As a result of the study, we can say that the role of individual key figures in the development of national culture is quite noticeable. This can be traced both at the local level and at the national level, when we should talk about individuals who in a certain period of development of society and culture were leading and became a kind of embodiment of universal experience accumulated in an individual with a certain identity, which is the "personality" required in "that place" and "that time". For this reason, we turn to the archetype of the Wise Old Man as an "invariant", a "conductor", which reflects the most realized and individualized personality in a particular chronotope.
References
Bharti, N. (2017). The 'Wise Old Man' of Kanthapura: Gandhi as an Archetype. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 5(6), 127-132. (in English)
Bolshakova, A. Y. (2010). Arkhetip – kontsept – kultura. Voprosy filosofii, 7, 47-57. (in Russian)
Danow, D. (1995). The spirit of carnival: Magical realism and the grotesque. Kentuky. (in English)
Franz, M.-L. von. (2004). Psikhologiya skazki. Tolkovanie volshebnykh skazok. St. Petersburg: B. S. K. (in Russian)
Frazer, J. (2001). Zolotaya vetv: Issledovanie magii i religii. M. K. Ryklin, Trans. Moscow: TERRA-Knizhnyy klub. (in Russian)
Jung, C. (1991). Arkhetip i simvol. Moscow: Renessans. (in Russian)
Jung, C. (2004). Dusha i mif. Shest arkhetipov. Moscow: Harvest. (in Russian)
Jung, C. (2013). Arkhetypy i kolektyvne nesvidome. K. Kotiuk, Trans. from German. Lviv: Astroliabiia. (in Ukrainian)
Krymsky, S. (2003). Zapyty filosofskykh smysliv. Kyiv: PARAPAN. (in Ukrainian)
Krymsky, S. (2008a). Sofiini symvoly buttia. In Pid syhnaturoiu Sofii (pp. 21-29). Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim "Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia". (in Ukrainian)
Krymsky, S. (2008b). Arkhetypy ukrainskoi kultury. In Pid syhnaturoiu Sofii (pp. 301-319). Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim "Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia". (in Ukrainian)
Kulish, P. (1984). Chorna rada. Khronika 1663 roku. In Tvory (Vol. 1, pp. 38-173). Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Kulish, P. (2015). Zapysky o Yuzhnoi Rusy: Knyha 1. In Povne zibrannia tvoriv. Naukovi pratsi. Publitsystyka (Vol. 3). Kyiv: Krytyka. (in Ukrainian)
Kushpet, V. (2007). Startsivstvo: Mandrivni spivtsi-muzykanty v Ukraini (XIX-poch. XX st.). Kyiv: Tempora. (in Ukrainian)
Lychkovakh, V. (2011). Filosofiia etnokultury. Teoretyko-metodolohichni ta estetychni aspekty istorii ukrainskoi kultury. Kyiv: PARAPAN. (in Ukrainian)
Roesler, C. (2014). Das Archetypenkonzept C. G. Jungs im Lichte aktueller Erkenntnisse aus Neurowissenschaften, humangenetik und Kulturpsychologie. Recherches Germaniques, (HS 9), 163-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rg.1749 (in German)
Rozmysł, M. (2018). In Search of the Wise Old Man Archetype: Master Twardowski. Studia et Documenta Slavica, 1-2, 69-76. (in English)
Scheler, M. (1988). Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos. A. Filippov, Trans. In Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy philosophii (pp. 31-95). Moscow: Progress. (in Russian)
Shevchenko, T. (2001). Perebendia. In Povne zibrannia tvoriv (Vol. 1, pp. 110-139). Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Sokolov, V. Y. (2001). Antropotsentryzm. Encyclopedia of modern Ukraine. Retrieved from http://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=43068 (in Ukrainian)
Sorochuk, L. (2015). Etnokulturna tradytsiia ukraintsiv u yevropeiskomu tsyvilizatsiinomu prostori. In Sotsiokulturnyi postup ukrainstva: tsyvilizatsiinyi kontekst: Monohrafiia (pp. 56-83). Kyiv: VPTs "Kyivskyi universytet". (in Ukrainian)
Tylor, E. (1989). Pervobytnaya kultura. Moscow: Izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury. (in Russian)
Yankovska, Z. (2016). Folkloryzm ukrainskoi romantychnoi prozy: Monohrafiia. Lviv: NVF "Ukrainski tekhnolohii". (in Ukrainian)
Zelensky, V. (2000). Tolkovyy slovar po analiticheskoy psikhologii. St. Petersburg: V&K. (in Russian)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).