ANTHROPOLOGICAL AND AXIOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON SOCIETY’S SELF-ORGANIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i18.221379Keywords:
social expectations, axiological dimension of social expectations, anthropological dimension of social expectations, stereotype of social expectations, the thanatology of social expectations, public self-organization, valuesAbstract
Purpose. The paper aimed at analyzing the anthropological and axiological dimensions of human social expectations in the aspect of the self-organization processes of social phenomena and revealing their essence. Theoretical basis. The research is based on the synergetic paradigm, the theory of shared intentionality as well as the concept of hidden influence on the processes of socialization, synchronization of social influence on moral decisions, benefits of the cooperative learning, interpretation of social expectations as epistemological norms and standards, and the concept of social support. Originality. Social expectations are considered in a synergistic relationship to their anthropological and axiological nature. The anthropological dimension of social expectations based on human nature as a mortal and rational being is outlined. The paper highlights the axiological dimension of social expectations on the ground of the need for socialization and imitation of systems of material and spiritual values in the group. The concept of stereotype and the thanatology of social expectations is substantiated. It is proved that the stereotype of social expectations is dependent on its axiological dimension, and the thanatology of social expectations is dependent on its anthropological dimension, which is based on human mortality. It has been studied out that the stereotypical and thanatological nature of social expectations significantly influences the processes of social self-organization. Conclusions. The social expectations of a person are oriented mainly toward the anthropological dimension of values since by nature a human is a mortal being. Human social expectations are mainly related to life, health, and safety showing the priority of the thanatological nature of social expectations and their futuristic content. Social expectations are also oriented towards social values. The latter is related to the collective rational nature of a person who is prone to social imitation, which affects the stereotypical nature of social expectations. Any social expectation is an axiological one. It is an expectation of material and spiritual values. The axiological dimension of social expectations has a stereotypical nature since it is linked to the specificity of collective socialization and coexistence. The anthropological dimension of social expectations has a thanatological character and is based on human nature as a mortal and at the same time rational being forming own rationality in the group. The concept of stereotypical and thanatological social expectations is promising for further scientific exploration as its methodological basis.
References
Behtoui, A. (2017). Social capital and the educational expectations of young people. European Educational Research Journal, 16(4), 487-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116682248 (in English)
Budz, V. (2017). Prolegomena to Self-Organization of Social Being. Conceptual and Methodological Bases of Research. In Self-Organisation of Public Reality in the Context of its Anthropological Principles and Axiological Factors: In 5 vols.: Monograph (Vol. 1). Ivano-Frankivsk: Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. (in Ukrainian)
Caplette, L., Gosselin, F., Mermillod, M., & Wicker, B. (2020). Real-world expectations and their affective value modulate object processing. NeuroImage, 213, 116736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116736 (in English)
Chen, C., Martínez, R. M., & Cheng, Y. (2020). The key to group fitness: The presence of another synchronizes moral attitudes and neural responses during moral decision-making. NeuroImage, 213, 116732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116732 (in English)
Dasgupta, N. (2013). Implicit Attitudes and Beliefs Adapt to Situations: A Decade of Research on the Malleability of Implicit Prejudice, Stereotypes, and the Self-Concept. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 233-279). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00005-X (in English)
Derex, M., & Boyd, R. (2018). Social information can potentiate understanding despite inhibiting cognitive effort. Scientific Reports, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28306-z (in English)
Goldberg, S. C. (2018). To the Best of Our Knowledge: Social Expectations and Epistemic Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (in English)
Hoian, I. M. (2019). Axiological Aspects of Moral and Legal Decision-Making. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 16, 66-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.187572 (in English)
Hornstein, E. A., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2018). A Social Safety Net: Developing a Model of Social-Support Figures as Prepared Safety Stimuli. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 25-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417729036 (in English)
Khmil, V. V., & Popovych, I. S. (2019). Philosophical and Psychological Dimensions of Social Expectations of Personality. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 16, 55-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.187540 (in English)
Manninen, S., Tuominen, L., Dunbar, R. I., Karjalainen, T., Hirvonen, J., Arponen, E. … Nummenmaa, L. (2017). Social Laughter Triggers Endogenous Opioid Release in Humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(25), 6125-6131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0688-16.2017 (in English)
Tomasello, M. (2016). Precís of A Natural History of Human Thinking. Journal of Social Ontology, 2(1), 59-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2015-0041 (in English)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).