THE ANTHROPOLOGIZATION OF DASEIN-PSYCHE’S BEING BY METHODS OF NEUROPHILOSOPHY

O. A. Bazaluk

doi:10.15802/ampr.v0i18.221297

Authors

O. A. Bazaluk Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, China https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1623-419X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i18.221297

Keywords:

anthropologization of Dasein, Dasein-psyche’s being, being of Dasein-the-One, arete, arete existentials, Heidegger, Plato

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to reveal the anthropologization of Dasein-psyche’s being by methods of neurophilosophy. The anthropologization of Dasein-psyche’s being by methods of neurophilosophy allows considering the noogenesis from the perspective of philosophical traditions, which is much richer in comparison with the history of scientific knowledge about the psychology of meanings. The being of Dasein-psyche in the meaning of "philosopher’s soul" was firstly mentioned by Plato in "Phaedo". The anthropologization of Dasein-psyche’s being reveals the ontological orientation and limits of the being of Dasein-psyche within the being of Dasein-the-One, as well as the intellect, knowledge and techne, as the arete existentials. Theoretical basis of the study is built on Heidegger’s fundamental ontology and methods of neurophilosophy. Originality lies in exploring Dasein-psyche through the neurophilosophical approach. In the context, Dasein-psyche is revealed as a part of the whole or the image (εἰκών), created from Dasein-Y-Matter as a paradigm. It is formed by the factors and causes of complication, as well as by the experience of being of the previous states of matter. Conclusions. In conclusion, the anthropologization of Dasein-psyche’s being by methods of neurophilosophy allows considering the noogenesis from the perspective of philosophical traditions. The essence of a person is revealed as the arete existentials, which require further rethinking and clarification.

Author Biography

O. A. Bazaluk, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology

Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology (Maoming, China), e-mail bazaluk@ukr.net

References

Aristotle. (1983). Sochineniya (Vols. 1-4). Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)

Balaban, P. M., & Gulyaeva, N. V. (2016). Neurophilosophy. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 46(9), 1078-1081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-016-0354-2 (in English)

Bazaluk, O., & Balinchenko, S. (2020). The Ethics Laws as a Basis for Building a Cosmic Civilization. The Sofia Republic. Philosophy and Cosmology, 24, 131-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/24/13 (in English)

Bazaluk, O., & Kharchenko, L. (2018). The Philosophy of the Cosmos as the New Universal Philosophical Teaching about Being. Philosophy and Cosmology, 21, 6-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/21/1 (in English)

Brentano, F. (2000). Origin of Moral Cognition. A. A. Anipko, Trans. from German. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya. (in Russian)

Diogenes Laertius. (1972). Lives of Eminent Philosophers. R. D. Hicks (Ed.). Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0258%3Abook%3D3%3Achapter%3D1 (in English)

Eliopoulos, P. (2019). From the Moral Limits of Personal Interest to the Derogation of Individual Identity: Colonialism and Oppression. Ukrainian Policymaker, 4, 4-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/up/4/1 (in English)

Hadot, I. (2002). Arts liberaux et philosophie dans la pensee antique. Y. F. Shichalina, Trans. from French. Moscow: Greco-Latin Cabinet by Y. A. Shichalina. (in Russian)

Hadot, P. (2005). La philosophie соmmе maniere de vivre. Entretiens ауес Jeannie Carlier et Arnold 1. Davidson. V. A. Vorobev, Trans. from French. Moscow: Stepnoy veter; St. Petersburg: Kolo. (in Russian)

Heidegger, M. (1961). On the Essence of Truth. J. Sallis, Trans. Retrieved from https://aphelis.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Martin-Heidegger-On-the-Essence-of-Truth.pdf (in English)

Heidegger, M. (1986). Plato’s Doctrine of Truth. In Historical and Philosophical Yearbook (pp. 255-275). Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)

Heidegger, M. (1997). Sein und Zeit. V. V. Bibikhin, Trans. from German. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (in Russian)

Husserl, E. (2004). Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to phenomenological philosophy. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. (in Russian)

Jaeger, W. (1946). Archaic Greece: The Mind of Athens. In Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture (Vol. 1). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (in English)

Kant, I. (1900). Kant on Education (UeberPaedagogik). A. Churton, Trans. Boston: D. C. Heath and Co. Retrieved from http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/kant-kant-on-education-uber-padagogik (in English)

Kant, I. (1966). Sochineniya (Vols. 1-6). Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)

Kastrup, B. (2018). The Next Paradigm. Future Human Image, 9, 41-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/9/4 (in English)

Khmil, V., & Malivskyi, A. (2018). The Problem of Forms of Completing the Copernicus Revolution in Modern Cartesian Science. Philosophy and Cosmology, 21, 131-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/21/14 (in English)

Kieliszek, Z., & Gocłowska, E. (2019). The Tragedy of Ismena’s Fate and Character with the "Theban trilogy" of Sophocles as the Realization of Aristotle’s Catharsis Theory. Studia Warmińskie, 56, 7-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.3686 (in Polish)

Koyré, A. (1999). Une évolution philosophique de Martin Heidegger. O. Nazarova, & A. Kozyrev, Trans. from French. Logos, 10, 113-136. Retrieved from http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/1999_10/06.htm#_ftn1 (in Russian)

Leontiev, D. (2003). Psikhologiya smysla: Priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoy realnosti. Moscow: Smysl. (in Russian)

Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1940). A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (in English)

Lin, Y.-W., & Bazaluk, O. (2020). Using Brain Science Theory to Analyze the Unity between Language Input and Output: Methodology Improvement Substantiation. Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 195-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-27-1-195-218 (in English)

May, H. (2010). Aristotle’s Ethics: Moral Development and Human Nature. Continuum. (in English)

More, M., & Vita-More, N. (Eds.). (2013). The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (in English)

Naam, R. (2005). More than Human: Embracing the Promise of Biological Enhancement. Broadway Books. (in English)

Northoff, G. (2019). What is Neurophilosophy? In M. Curado & S. S. Gouveia (Eds.), Automata’s Inner Movie: Science and Philosophy of Mind (pp. xi-xv). Vernon Press. (in English)

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1930). The Revolt of the Masses. Retrieved from http://pinkmonkey.com/dl/library1/revolt.pdf (in English)

Plato. (1994). Sobranie sochineniy (Vols. 1-4). Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)

Plato. (2020a). Phaedo. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/searchresults?q=Phaedo (in English)

Plato. (2020b). Republic. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/searchresults?q=Republic (in English)

Plato. (2020c). Timaeus. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/searchresults?q=Timaeus (in English)

Plotinus. (1952). The Six Enneads. S. MacKenna & B. S. Page, Trans. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/plotenn/index.htm (in English)

Safranski, R. (1999). Martin Heidegger: Between Good and Evil. Harvard University Press. (in English)

Sheehan, T. (2014). Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. Rowman & Littlefield International. (in English)

Terepyshchyi, S., & Khomenko, H. (2019). The Dialectics of Humanism and Pragmatism as a Basis for the Formation of Higher Education Strategy Development. Ukrainian Policymaker, 5, 98-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/up/5/11 (in English)

Tytarenko, V., & Rudenko, S. (2018). Kant’s Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of Soviet Period. Future Human Image, 9, 107-114. DOI: http://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/9/11 (in English)