ANTHROPOLOGICAL SPHERE OF HUMAN EXISTENCE: RESTRICTIONS ON HUMAN RIGHTS DURING PANDEMIC THREATS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i18.221295Keywords:
fear, death, pandemic, COVID-19, anthropological sphere, human existence, human rights, civil society, state, philosophy of lawAbstract
Purpose. The article is aimed to study the anthropological, socio-philosophical and philosophical-legal dimensions of the ontological sphere of human life within the discourse of restricting human rights during pandemic threats. To do this, one should solve a number of tasks, among which are the following: 1) to explore the anthropological and praxeological understanding of fear as a primary component of human existence in a pandemic, which prevents people from changing their lives for the better and healthier, having fun and happiness; 2) to put a focus on the habituation of fear as a two-dimensional (short-term and long-term) adaptation to risks and threats from pandemics; 3) to reflect the anthropological features of changes in human life experience under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the discourse of human rights and public health measures. Theoretical basis. Today, international guiding principles on human rights response to global natural threats have been updated. However, there are still no specific legal recommendations (both at the international and national levels) concerning measures on human rights protection during outbreaks of various infectious diseases. However, the influence of unexpected global challenges (especially COVID-19 and not just that) causes a change in the anthropological component of society and the state, so it requires immediate comprehensive research. Originality. It was substantiated a systematic approach to the implementation of modern healthcare policy towards the recognition of human life as the highest value, increasing the level of psychological preparedness for pandemic challenges and approximation of statutory provisions of human rights protection to modern challenges and threats to the health of the individual, society and state. The study of anthropological, socio-philosophical and philosophical-legal dimensions of human existence in the discourse of pandemic threats made it possible to reveal the profound influence of fear on human life, social justice and, consequently, identify the moral and legal dependence of the development level of society and the state on the level of axiological and anthropological concept of human dignity. Conclusions. Based on the study of statistical reports, international analysis and the use of personal authorial methods, the following can be stated: the methods of combating the modern pandemic have directly affected everyone on national and international level. Their influence is significant because it changes the rules of coexistence and life of people in all spheres. However, the influence on the consciousness and other intentions of the individual has mostly temporally insignificant limits.
References
Breitbart, W. (2017). Existential guilt and the fear of death. Palliative and Supportive Care, 15(5), 509-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517000797 (in English)
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912-920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8 (in English)
Cohen, J. (2020). Paradigm Under Threat: Health and Human Rights Today. Health and Human Rights Journal. Retrieved from https://www.hhrjournal.org/2020/09/paradigm-under-threat-health-and-human-rights-today (in English)
Critchley, S. (2020). To Philosophize Is to Learn How to Die. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/11/opinion/covid-philosophy-anxiety-death.html (in English)
Delaneuville, F. (2020). Reconciling the Acquisition of Professional Skills and the Development of Critical Thinking through a Transdisciplinary and Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Teaching: The Strategy of the Slovak-French University Institute. Politické vedy, 23(2), 263-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2020.23.2.263-269 (in English)
Dómsmálaráðuneytið. (2020). Rafræn skráning meðmælenda fyrir forsetakosningar opnuð. Retrieved from https://www.stjornarradid.is/efst-a-baugi/frettir/stok-frett/2020/04/17/Rafraen-skraning-medmaelenda-fyrir-forsetakosningar-opnud (in Icelandic)
In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. (2020). Plaintiffs’ Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. Retrieved from https://www.adflegal.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/First%20Baptist%20Church%20v.%20Kelly%20-%20Notice%20of%20voluntary%20dismissal.pdf (in English)
International IDEA. (2020). Panorama global del impacto del COVID-19 en las elecciones. Retrieved from https://www.idea.int/es/news-media/multimedia-reports/panorama-global-del-impacto-del-covid-19-en-las-elecciones (in English)
James, A., Eagle, L., Phillips, C., Hedges, D. S., Bodenhamer, C., Brown, R. … Kirking, H. (2020). High COVID-19 Attack Rate Among Attendees at Events at a Church – Arkansas, March 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(20), 632-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6920e2 (in English)
Kollár, D. (2020). Medzinárodná vedecká konferencia: "Bezpečnostné fórum 2020". Politické Vedy, 23(1), 252-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2020.23.1.252-255 (in Polish)
Lebret, A. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and derogation to human rights. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa015 (in English)
Movchan, M. N. (2018). The problem of fear and fear of death in the Indian philosophy of the twentieth century and in the religious and philosophical teachings of Buddhism. Hileya, 129, 218-222. (in Ukrainian)
Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). Ramkovi nastanovy shchodo vidpovidi osvity na pandemiiu COVID-19 2020 roku. Herald of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://visnyk.naps.gov.ua/index.php/journal/publications/4 (in Ukrainian)
Rubenstein, L., & DeCamp, M. (2020). Revisiting Restrictions of Rights After COVID-19. Health and Human Rights Journal. Retrieved from https://www.hhrjournal.org/2020/06/revisiting-restrictions-of-rights-after-covid-19 (in English)
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2015). The Worm at the Core: On the Role of Death in Life. Random House. (in English)
Stawicki, S., Jeanmonod, R., Miller, A., Paladino, L., Gaieski, D., Yaffee, A. … Garg, M. (2020). The 2019-2020 novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic: A joint american college of academic international medicine-world academic council of emergency medicine multidisciplinary COVID-19 working group consensus paper. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, 12(2), 47-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jgid.jgid_86_20 (in English)
Sutin, A. R., Luchetti, M., Aschwanden, D., Lee, J. H., Sesker, A. A., Strickhouser, J. E. … Terracciano, A. (2020). Change in five-factor model personality traits during the acute phase of the coronavirus pandemic. PLOS ONE, 15(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237056 (in English)
United States District Court Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga. (2020). Plaintiffs’ Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. Retrieved from https://www.adflegal.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/Metropolitan%20Tabernacle%20Church%20v.%20City%20of%20Chattanooga%20-%20Notice%20of%20voluntary%20dismissal.pdf (in English)
Wilder-Smith, A., & Freedman, D. O. (2020). Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(2), 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa020 (in English)
Winter, Sebastian F., & Winter, Stefan F. (2018). Human Dignity as Leading Principle in Public Health Ethics: A Multi-Case Analysis of 21st Century German Health Policy Decisions. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(3), 210-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/IJHPM.2017.67 (in English)
World Health Organization. (2011). Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005). Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA64/A64_10-en.pdf?ua=1 (in English)
World Health Organization. (2020a). Disease outbreaks by year. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/csr/don/archive/year/en/ (in English)
World Health Organization. (2020b). Critical preparedness, readiness and response actions for COVID-19: Interim Guidance. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications-detail/critical-preparedness-readiness-and-response-actions-for-covid-19 (in English)
World Health Organization. (2020c). Obespechenie bezopasnosti pri provedenii mesyatsa Ramadan v usloviyakh rasprostraneniya koronavirusnoy infektsii COVID-19: Vremennye rekomendatsii: 2020, April 15. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331767/WHO-2019-nCoV-Ramadan-2020.1-rus.pdf (in Russian)
World Health Organization. (2020d). Prakticheskie soobrazheniya i rekomendatsii dlya religioznykh liderov i konfessionalnykh obshchin v kontekste COVID-19: Vremennye rekomendatsii: 2020, April 7. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331707/WHO-2019-nCoV-Religious_Leaders-2020.1-rus.pdf?ua=1 (in Russian)
World Health Organization. (2020e). Vazhneyshie mery po podgotovke, obespecheniyu gotovnosti i reagirovaniyu v svyazi s COVID-19: Vremennye rekomendatsii: 2020, March 22. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331826/WHO-2019-nCoV-Community_actions-2020.3-rus.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (in Russian)
Yamin, A. E., & Habibi, R. (2020). Human Rights and Coronavirus: What’s at Stake for Truth, Trust, and Democracy? Health and Human Rights Journal. Retrieved from https://www.hhrjournal.org/2020/03/human-rights-and-coronavirus-whats-at-stake-for-truth-trust-and-democracy (in English)
5 Reasons the world needs WHO, to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. (2020). UN News. Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/04/1061412 (in English)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).