ANTHROPOLOGY OF VISUAL SELF-OBJECTIFICATION OF THE PAINTER (BASED ON WORKS BY ARTEMISIA GENTILESCHI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i17.206728Keywords:
Artemisia Gentileschi, painter’s self-objectification, visual self-presentation in painting, anthropocentric approach, man, the principle of anthropological reduction, organon-principle, anthropological interpretation, the principle of "open question"Abstract
Purpose. Based on the anthropocentric approach to the analysis of visual self-presentations of Artemisia Gentileschi in paintings, to present the artwork as self-objectifications of the artist, which give rise to a new cultural reality and are at the same time a means of knowing the essence of man. Theoretical basis. The principles and methods of philosophical and anthropological research in combination with biographical, historical and comparative, iconographic, figurative and stylistic methods were used when writing the article. Among philosophical and anthropological methods the principle of anthropological reduction was used, based on which the works by Artemisia Gentileschi were analyzed as her self-objectification, principle of extrapolation of a separate fact (rape) of the painter’s life and anthropological interpretation of art evolution, when an attempt is made to know their creator through a series of chronological consistent works as figurative objectification. The biographical method was used when working with data on the painter’s life, iconographic and figurative stylistic (techniques of composition, narrative, color characteristics) – when analyzing the art visuals: self-portraits, allegories and narrative paintings. The analytical work was carried out in stages as transition from an iconographic interpretation of paintings with gradual elimination of art and style characteristics as extra-anthropological cultural constants with subsequent anthropological reduction of cultural image. Originality consists in the author’s method of analyzing the works of visual art in terms of anthropocentric approach, as well as in considering the artwork by Artemisia Gentileschi as her self-objectification as such that give rise to a new cultural reality. Conclusions. The artworks by Artemisia Gentileschi in diachronic deployment can be seen as the painter’s self-objectification, which traces the evolution of self-expression from a person with traditional self-perception by social gender stereotypes (1610) to the phenomenon of personal life, which will determine further evolution of her self-identification (rape in 1611) and extirpation of sense of shame through virtual revenge (self-expression in the cycle of Judith), repentance (cycle of Mary Magdalene), guilt (cycle of Lucretia), and formation of component of the painter’s identity as exemption from social gender prejudices and stereotypes on roles and standards of behavior socially assigned to women (cycle of Susanna).References
Barker, S. (2018). The First Biography of Artemisia Gentileschi: Self-fashioning and Proto-feminist Art History in Cristofano Bronzini’s Notes of Women Artists. Mitteilungen Des Kunsthistorischen Institutes in Florenz, 60(3), 404-435. (in English)
Bissell, R. Ward. (1968). Artemisia Gentileschi–A New Documented Chronology. The Art Bulletin, 50(2), 153-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3048529 (in English)
Bissell, R. Ward. (1999). Artemisia Gentileschi and the Authority of Art: Critical Reading and Catalogue Raisonne. PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. (in English)
Bollnow, O. F. (1996). Die philosophische Anthropologie und ihre methodischen Prinzipien. A. Hordiienko, Trans. from German. In V. V. Liakh, & V. S. Pazenok, Suchasna zarubizhna filosofiia. Techii i napriamy: Khrestomatiia (pp. 96-111). Кyiv: Vakler. (in Ukrainian)
Cavazzini, P. (2001). Documents Relating to the Trial of Agostino Tassi. In J. P. O’Neill (Ed.), Orazio and Artemisia Gentileschi (pp. 432-444). New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. (in English)
Cropper, E. (2001). Life on the Edge: Artemisia Gentileschi, Famous Women Painter. In J. P. O’Neill (Ed.), Orazio and Artemisia Gentileschi (pp. 262-281). New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. (in English)
Daugherty, B. (2015). Between Historical Truth and Story-Telling: The Twentieth-Century Fabrication of "Artemisia". University of Nebraska-Lincoln. (in English)
Ferro, A., & Civitarese, G. (2013). Analysts in Search of an Author: Voltaire or Artemisia Gentileschi? Commentary on "Field Theory in Psychoanalysis, Part 2: Bionian Field Theory and Contemporary Interpersonal/Relational Psychoanalysis" by Donnel B. Stern. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23(6), 646-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2013.851549 (in English)
Garrard, M. D. (1980). Artemisia Gentileschi’s Self-Portrait as the Allegory of Painting. The Art Bulletin, 62(1), 97-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3049963 (in English)
Garrard, M. D. (1989). Artemisia Gentileschi: The Image of the Female Hero in Italian Baroque Art. Princeton University Press. (in English)
Locker, J. (2010). An Eighteenth-Century Biography of Artemisia Gentileschi. Source: Notes in the History of Art, 29(2), 27-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/sou.29.2.23208613 (in English)
Locker, J. M. (2015). Artemisia Gentileschi: The Language of Painting (pp. 3-5). Yale University Press. (in English)
Robinson, R. L. R. (2017). Wonder Women: Sofonisba Anguissola, Lavinia Fontana and Artemisia Gentileschi. A Critical Analysis of Renaissance and Baroque Self-Portrait Painting by Female Artists. Italy: Studio Art Centers International Florence. (in English)
Scheler, M. (1988). Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos. A. Filippov, Trans. In Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy philosophii (pp. 31-95). Moscow: Progress. (in Russian)
Scheler, M. (1994). Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die Materiale Wertethik. In Izbrannye proizvedeniya (pp. 259-338). Trans. from German. Moscow: Gnozis. (in Russian)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).