ФІЛОСОФІЯ ДЕКАРТА: БАЗОВА ІНТЕНЦІЯ ТА СТАТУС АНТРОПОЛОГІЇ

Anatolii M. Malivskyi

doi:10.15802/ampr2013/19785

Authors

Anatolii M. Malivskyi Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6923-5145

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2013/19785

Keywords:

anthropology, basic intention, reductionism, de-anthropologization, self-creation

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to emphasize the insufficiency of reductionist interpretation of Descartes’ heritage and to bring into focus the constitutive role of anthropology in Descartes authentic project. Scientific novelty. Substantiation of anthropology in Descartes’ philosophical structure is based upon recognition of key importance of anthropological intention in previous philosophy as well as anthropological one in philosopher’s own works. Therefore, the insufficiency of established de-anthropologised interpretation of essential intention of Descartes’ doctrine becomes evident. Methodology. The use of phenomenology and hermeneutics enables us to comprehend the key philosopher’s ideas as the manifestation of his personality. The concentration on the interpretation of Descartes ideas as the manifestation of determining influence of external factors is the shortcoming of the established reductionist methodology. Conclusions. It was proved that anthropology that should have been the conclusion of Descartes’ philosophy under conditions of domination of reductionist attitude was withdrawn by the de-anthropologised reality image. The comprehension of the authentic image of Descartes’ philosophy provides special attention to the anthropological element in his ontology.

Author Biography

Anatolii M. Malivskyi, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan

Malivskyі Anatolii, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor of Philosophical Sciences, Department of Philosophy and Sociology of Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, was born in 1957 in Ukraine. The title of Candidate of Philosophical Sciences PhD thesis: "The Phenomenon of Representation in Classical and Modern Philosophy". It is devoted to the phenomenon of the ontological approach to the representation of the European classical philosophy and its modern interpretation. Associate Professor Malivskyі A. an author of over 30 scientific publications, including "The first and second" Critique’s "Kant" (1991), "The creation and the thing: a critique of consciousness in the doctrine represented by M.Heidegger " (1994), "The ambiguity of understanding the rationality of Rene Descartes' (1996) "Alternative theory of the nature by Arthur Schopenhauer" (1998), "The anthropological dimension of Cartesian metaphysics in the context of the crisis of technological civilization" (2006), "The anthropological dimension of metaphysics "the dialogue of" Heidegger and Descartes (2008)," "The philosophical doctrine of Kant as the search of the authentic forms of anthropological metaphysics "(2012). Associate Professor Malivskyі A. an expert on the history of philosophy, the problems of reception of European classic’s philosophy in the modern context, the anthropological dimension of metaphysics. Associate Professor Malivskyі A. was a member of the XX World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, 1998.

References

Dekart R. Sochineniya: V 2-kh tt [Works: in 2 vols]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1989. – T. 1. 654 p.

Jean-Luc Marion. On Descartes' Metaphysical Prism: The Constitution and the Limits of Onto-theo-logy in Cartesian Thought. University of Chicago 1999. - 370р.

Jean-Luc Marion. On the Ego on the God.: further Cartesian question / translated by Christina M. Gschwandter. – New York, 2007. – 277p.

Koplston F.Ch. Istoriya srednevekovoy filosofii [History of Medieval Philosophy]. Moscow, Enigma Publ., 1997. 512 p.

Seneka. O schastlivoy zhizni // Rimskie stoiki: Seneka, Epiktet, Mark Avreliy [Oh happy life]. Moscow, Respublika Publ, 1995, 463 p.

Cottingham J. Cartesian Reflections. Essays on Descartes’s Philosophy. – Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008. – 332 р.

Khaydeggger M. Yevropeyskiy nigilizm [European nihilism] // Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii. Moscow, 1988. 261–313 pp.

Khaydegger M. Yevropeyskiy nigilizm [European nihilism] // Khaydeggger M. Vremya i bytie. Moscow, 1993. 63–176 pp.

Malivśký A.M. Hajdehher pro antropolohični intenciji Filosofuvannia Dekarta [Heidegger anthropological intention of philosophizing Descartes] // Antropolohični vymiry filosofśkych doslidžeń. Zbirnyk naukovych prać, № 3, p. 14-22.

Hanna Arendt. Ctanovyšče liudyny [The situation of human]. Pereklala z anhl. Marija Zubryćka. 1999. 255 p.

Khesle V. Genii filosofii Novogo vremeni [Genes philosophy Newtime]. Moscow, 1992. p. 198.

Bitbol-Hesperies A. Cartesian physiology // Descartes' Natural Philosophy / ed. вy Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, John Sutton. – London: Routledge, 2000. – Р. 349–382.

Voss S. The End of Anthropology // Reason, Will and Sensation / ed. John Cottingham. – Oxford: Clarendot Press, 1994. – P. 273–306.

Sartr Zh.P. Kartezianskaya svoboda [Cartesian freedom] // Sartr Zh.P. Problemy metoda. Stati. 222 p., 197-216 pp.

Dekart R. Chelovek [Man]. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2012. 128 p.

Œuvres complètes in 11 vol. – Paris: Vrin, publiées par Ch. Adam et P. Tannery, 1996.

Wilson Catherine. Descartes and Augustine // A Сompanion to Descartes / edited by Janet Broughton and John Carriero. Blackwell Publishing. 2008. p. 33-51.

Mayorov G.G. Formirovanie srednevekovoy filosofii [Formation of medieval philosophy]. 1979.

СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ / СПИСОК ИСПОЛЬЗОВАННЫХ ИСТОЧНИКОВ
(ДСТУ ГОСТ 7.1:2006)

Арендт, Г. Cтановище людини / Ганна Арендт; пер. з англ. Марія Зубрицька. – 1999. – 255с.

Декарт, Р. Сочинения: В 2-х т. – М. : Мысль, 1989. – Т. 1. – 654 с.

Декарт, Р. Человек / пер. с франц. Б. М. Скуратов; сост., ред., посл. и прим. Т. А. Дмитриев. – М. : Праксис, 2012. – 128 с.

Коплстон, Ф. Ч. История средневековой философии / пер. с англ. И. Борисовой; послесл. М. Гарнцева. – М. : Энигма, 1997. – 512 с.

Майоров, Г. Г. Формирование средневековой философии. – 1979.

Малівський, А. М. Гайдеґґер про антропологічні інтенції філософування Декарта // Антропологічні виміри філософських досліджень: зб. наук. праць. – Д., 2013. – Вип. № 3. – С. 14–22.

Сартр, Ж. П. Картезианская свобода // Ж. П. Сартр. Проблемы метода. Статьи. / Пер. с фр. В. П. Гайдамака. – С. 197–216.

Сенека. О счастливой жизни // Римские стоики: Сенека, Эпиктет, Марк Аврелий / Вступ. ст., сост. и подг. текста В. В. Сапова. – М. : Республика, 1995. – С. 167–192. – (Б-ка этической мысли).

Хайдегггер, М. Европейский нигилизм // Проблема человека в западной философии. – М., 1988. – С. 261–313.

Хайдеггер, М. Европейский нигилизм // Хайдеггер М. Время и бытие. – М., 1993. – С. 63–176.

Хесле, В. Гении философии Нового времени. – М., 1992. – С. 198.

Bitbol-Hesperies, A. Cartesian physiology// Descartes' Natural Philosophy / ed. вy Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, John Sutton. – London : Routledge, 2000. – Р. 349–382.

Œuvres complètes en 11 vol. – Paris : Vrin, publiées par Ch. Adam et P. Tannery, 1996.

Cottingham, J. Cartesian Reflections. Essays on Descartes’s Philosophy. – Oxford : Oxford UP, 2008. – 332 р.

Jean-Luc, Marion. On Descartes' Metaphysical Prism: The Constitution and the Limits of Onto-theo-logy in Cartesian Thought. – University of Chicago, 1999. – 370 р.

Jean-Luc, Marion. On the Ego on the God.: further Cartesian question / translated by Christina M. Gschwandter. – New York, 2007. – 277 p.

Voss, S. The End of Anthropology // Reason, Will and Sensation / ed. John Cottingham. – Oxford : Clarendot Press, 1994. – P. 273–306.

Wilson, Catherine. Descartes and Augustine // A Сompanion to Descartes / edited by Janet Broughton and John Carriero. – Blackwell Publishing, 2008. – Р. 33–51.