THE PROBLEM OF SEARCHING THE MEANING OF HUMAN EXISTENCE: CONTEMPORARY CONTEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i17.196764Keywords:
human, reason for existence, being, cognition, global problems, transcendentalAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of the article is the analysis of the reasons and grounds of the crisis in the sphere of meaning-making, as well as searching answers to the questions about the meaning of human life in the contemporary world, which are maximally relevant in connection with the escalation of global problems, revealing the points of convergence between various theoretical positions, evaluation of their heuristic potential. Theoretical basis of the research is the historical-philosophical, comparative and system approaches, as well as the analysis of philosophical insights in the field of global studies. Originality. Originality lies in the fact that this article is the first attempt to conduct comprehensive analysis in the problem of the sense of the Existence as it is presented in the first quarter of the 21st century and to relate it with the modern social situation that is characterized by a complex range of interconnected and interdependent anthropological problems of our time. Authors emphasize that the main reason in the crisis of meaning is that a man has lost touch with his roots, which is wildlife. He has created an artificial structure, civilization to satisfy his needs and finds no way to the transcendental, which is the true House of his being. Conclusions. A human must refuse from false self-conceit concerning his potential omniscience and omnipotence, cease dictating his own rules to the Existence, determine the boundaries of his freedom and try to clearly realize his place in the objective structure of being. The global situation can change for the better only if a dramatic change in the area of meaning-making happens. The decisive force, which may encourage nudging to the positive changes, can be either the free will of people who have realized the criticality of the situation or external natural and social circumstances that will make people reorganize radically. The proper prioritizing, a deep awareness of universal goals and solidarity between people could be the value basis that will become the foundation to find the meaning and create a more favorable future.References
Bostrom, N. O. (2016). Iskusstvennyy intellekt. Etapy. Ugrozy. Strategii. Moscow: OOO "Mann, Ivanov i Ferber". (in Russian)
Camus, A. (1990). Buntuyushchiy chelovek. Moscow: Politizdat. (in Russian)
Danilov-Danilyan, V. I., & Reif, I. E. (2016). Biosfera i tsivilizatsiya. Moscow: Entsiklopediya. (in Russian)
Frankl, V. (1990). Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian)
Hubner, B. (2006). Smysl v bes-SMYSLENNOE vremya: Metafizicheskie raschety, proschety i svedenie schetov. A. B. Demidov, Trans. from German. Minsk: Ekonompress. (in Russian)
Joe, T. G. (2019). The Meaning of Human Vulnerability – Man in the era of human enhancement –. The Catholic Philosophy, 32, 5-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16895/cathp.2019.32.1.005 (in Korean)
Kiymaz, T. (2019). On the meaning of "the meaning of life". Filosofia Unisinos, 20(2), 146-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2019.202.04 (in English)
Kurzweil, R. (2002). The Singularity is Near. New York: Viking Books. (in English)
Paskal, B. (1995). Mysli. Y. A. Ginzburg, Trans. from French. Moscow: Izdatelstvo im. Sabashnikovyh. (in Russian)
Phillips, A. (2019). Marshall H. Lewis, Viktor Frankl and the Book of Job: A Search for Meaning. Theology, 122(6), 463-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0040571X19872109t (in English)
Schopenhauer, A. (1992). Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. (in Russian)
Shapoval, V. M. (2019). The Metaphysics of Power: A Classical Philosophical Discourse. S. P. A. C. E. Society, Politics, Administration in Central Europe, 11, 36-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32837/space.v0i11.136 (in Ukrainian)
Shmidt, E., & Koen, D. (2013). Novyy tsifrovoy mir. Moscow: OOO "Mann, Ivanov i Ferber". (in Russian)
Skinner, C. (2018). Digital human. The fourth revolution of humanity includes everyone. Marshall Cavendish International (Asia) Pte Ltd. (in English)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).