EGOISM AS A WAY OUT OF EXISTENTIAL CRISIS FOR A PERSON IN DISABILITY SITUATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i17.193983Keywords:
egoism, egoaltruism, ordinary being, ultimate being, being beyond the bounds, person, disabilityAbstract
Purpose of the article is to establish the role of egoism in the life of a person faced with a disability situation, as a moment of self-determination in an existential crisis. I set the task to evaluate the influence of egoism and find out its significance in the prospect of the person’s further existence in the conditions of disability using the philosophical anthropology based on the meta-anthropology principle. Theoretical basis. Based on the fact that the role of egoism is perceived by public opinion as a vice and entails the absorption by a person of the benefits intended for others, I find them inappropriate for a person in a situation of disability. Taking into account the concepts of ego of altruism and altruistic egoism, which partially justify the positive influence of egoism, are only a product of the symbiotic interaction of altruism and egoism. The combination of egoism with altruism cannot reveal the essence of the crisis for a person in a disability situation. In a situation of disability, a person cannot synthesize altruism, as part of the egoism symbiosis. Methodological system in the study of the positive role of egoism, the modern theory of meta-anthropology by Nazip Khamitov is used. The theory that divides the being of a person into various types (ordinary, ultimate, and being beyond the bounds) is able to most fully structure the concept of egoism in the being of a person who has disability. Originality. I made an attempt to prove the positive role of egoism in a situation related to the body transformation into new conditions. The analysis of evidence of the need for the egoism development, as a function capable of actualizing a person in the formed crisis circumstances is carried out. A theory about the need for egoism to get a person out of the existential crisis situation (ultimate being) in which he stays due to a disability situation was proposed. Conclusions. I show that taking care of oneself (egoism) is a balancing factor for a person, as opposing a fatally unfair situation in which a person has received disability. Rational egoism is able to bring a person out of ultimate being and allow him to transform into a new, changed reality.References
Antonova, V. M., & Kuznetsova, M. N. (2017). Zabota o sebe kak mekhanizm preodoleniya bolezni. Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences, 7(1), 466-467. (in Russian)
Avdeeva, I. A. (2013). Globalnaya etika i lokalnyy egoizm. Filosofiya i obshchestvo, 1, 128-135. (in Russian)
Bazaluk, O., & Blazhevych, T. (2015). Modern Basics Philosophy of Education. Future Human Image, 2(5), 93-100. (in Russian)
Bernini, L. (2015). Zolotye rybki, filosofy i akrobatika mysli : Nevozmozhnost etiki Mishelya Fuko. My vse v zabote postoyannoy… Kontseptsiya zaboty o sebe v istorii pedagogiki i kultury: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii pamyati filosofa, sotsiologa, psikhologa G. V. Ivanchenko (1965–2009), September 9-11, 2015, Moscow, 43-54. (in Russian)
Chernyshevsky, N. G. (1974). Sobranie sochineniy (Vol. 4). Moscow: Pravda. (in Russian)
Downing, L. (2019). Selfish Women. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429285349 (in English)
Filatov, A. V. (2011). Lev Shestov – Egoism as Important Feature of Tragic Personality. Tambov University Review, 2(94), 256-259. (in Russian)
Foucault, M. (1998). Histoire de la sexualite-III: Le souci de soi. Moscow: Refl-buk. (in Russian)
Gayvoronskaya, A. A. (2012). Specifics socially-psychological adaptation from expressiveness of installation on altruism/egoism. Perm University Herald, 4(12), 81-84. (in Russian)
Ivanhoe, P. J. (2018). Selfishness and Self-Centeredness. In Oneness: East Asian Conceptions of Virtue, Happiness, and How We Are All Connected. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190840518.003.0004 (in English)
Khamitov, N. (2017). Filosofiya: Bytie. Chelovek. Mir: Kurs lektsiy. Kyiv: KNT. (in Ukrainian)
Koromyslov, V. V. (2019). Approach to research of egoism from perspective of specific all-general development theory. International Research Journal, 1(79), 51-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23670/irj.2019.79.1.038 (in Russian)
Kuznetsov, V. V. (2017). Dignity as a fundamental principle of culture or as a manifestation of the law of the "existential self". St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), 90-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.8309 (in Russian)
Lekhcier, V. L. (2007). Bol i perekhodnost: Nabrosok ekzistentsialnoy algoditsei. Voprosy filosofii, 12, 41-49. (in Russian)
Lozovoy, V. O., & Ponedilok, A. I. (2018). Failure as one of the personality self-destruction factors. The Bulletin of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. Series: Philosophy, Philosophy of Law, Political Science, Sociology, 3(38), 31-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21564/2075-7190.38.139947 (in Ukrainian)
Maksimenko, L. A., Zenets, N. G., & Varova, N. L. (2018). Biological metaphysical scientism in addressing the issue of altruism and egoism. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 427, 79-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/427/10 (in Russian)
Nietzsche, F. (2005). Volya k vlasti. Opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostey. Moscow: Kulturnaya revolyutsiya. (in Russian)
Ryurikov, Y. B. (1990). Med i yad lyubvi. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya. (in Russian)
Schopenhauer, A. (2014). Metafizika polovoy lyubvi. St. Petersburg: Azbuka. (in Russian)
Selye, H. (1979). Stress bez distressa. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian)
Shestov, L. I. (2016). Рrо et contra. St. Petersburg: RKhGA. (in Russian)
Sizikova, T. E. (2019). The influence of polymodality of reflection on personality self-organization. Science for Education Today, 9(1), 57-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1901.04 (in Russian)
Steiner, R. (2007). Egoizm v filosofii. Moscow: Evidentis. (in Russian)
Tillich, P. (1995). The courage to be. T. I. Vevyurko, Trans. In P. Tillich, Izbrannoe: Teologiya kultury (pp. 7-131). Moscow: Yurist. (in Russian)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).