GENDER PARTNERSHIP AND TOLERANCE PHENOMENON
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i15.169482Keywords:
gender partnership, tolerance, united actions, communication, cooperation, co-creation, human relationsAbstract
Purpose. The article analyzes the role of such a phenomenon as tolerance in a partnership between a man and a woman, emphasizing its importance and necessity in their relations. The purpose of the study is to estimate the role of the tolerance phenomenon in the process of gender partnership. Theoretical basis. The works of domestic and foreign scientists contributed to estimate the function of tolerance during communication, cooperation and co-creation. In this paper the methodology of E. Fromm and N. Khamitov’s metaanthropology is used. Originality. It was proved that the success of a gender partnership depends on how tolerant its participants are to each other. Besides this, it has been established that tolerance is the main criterion for gender partnership. The idea of tolerance is considered as the way to fruitful development of human relations. For the first time it has been determined that gender partnership can be manifested on the ordinary, frontier and metafrontier levels of human existence. Tolerance has its own specifics and a manifestation on each of them. Conclusions. Metaanthropology has helped to estimate the role of tolerance among men and women in the partnership process. So, it can be stated that tolerance is a basis for gender partnership that harmonizes the relationship among a man and a woman and makes them egalitarian. Only on the metafrontier level of human being tolerance can be manifestation of individual integrity. Sincere, open interaction and creative work with Other are formed on this foundation. Thus, gender partnership with inexhaustible, complementary potential is the vector of development of human relations.
References
Aheieva, V. P., Kobelianska, L. S., & Skoryk, M. M. (Eds.). (2004). Osnovy teorii genderu: Navchalnyi posibibnyk. Kyiv: К.І.S. (in Ukrainian)
Beauvoir, S. de. (1997). Le deuxième sexe. (Vol. 1-2). S. G. Ayvazova (Ed.), Trans. from French; M. V. Aristova. Мoscow: Progress; St. Petersburg: Aleteyya. (in Russian)
Berdyaеv, N. (1989). Eros i lichnost. Filosofiya pola i lyubvi. Moscow: Prometey. (in Russian)
Diamond, L. M. (2015). Sexual fluidity: The international encyclopedia of human sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs452 (in English)
ERA Progress Report 2018. Data gathering and information for the 2018 ERA monitoring-Technical Report. (2019). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/era/era_progress_report_2018-technical.pdf (in English)
Fromm, E., & Dobrenkov, V. (Ed.). (1990). To have or to be? (2 Edit.). Trans. from Engl. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian)
Hrynevych, L. (2016). Instytualizatsiia hendernoi osvity: Perspektyvy ta ryzyky. Gender Culture Centre. Retrieved from https://www.genderculturecentre.org/institucionalizaciya-gendernoi-osvit/ (in Ukrainian)
Khamitov, N. (2017). Etika: Put k krasote otnosheniy. Kyiv: KNT. (in Russian)
Khamitov, N., Krylova, S., Rozova, T., Mineva, S., & Lyutyy, T. (2014). Filosofskaya antropologiya: Slovar. Kyiv: KNT. (in Russian)
Kirilina, A. (2000). O primenenii ponyatya gender v russkoyazychnom lingvisticheskom opisanii. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 3, 18-19. (in Russian)
Krylova, S. (2011). Krasa liudyny: Osobystist, simia, suspilstvo (soscialno-filosofskyi analiz): Monohrafiia. Nizhin: Aspekt-Polihraf. (in Ukrainian)
Marinelli, N., Mazzoli, C., & Palmucci, F. (2017). How does gender really affect investment behavior? Economics Letters, 151, 58-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.006 (in English)
Mounier, E. (1992). Personalizm. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
Murgia, A., & Poggio, B. (2018). Gender and precarious research careers. A comparative analysis. London: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315201245 (in English)
Pleșu, A. (2013). Tolerance and the Intolerable. Crisis of Concept. Baltic Worlds, 3-4, 10-14. (in English)
Saukh, P. (2001). Ukraina na mezhi tysiacholit: Transformatsiia dukhu i vyprobuvannia natsionalnym buttiam. Rivne: Volynski Oberehy. (in Ukrainian)
The Global Gender Gap Report 2016. (2017). World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GGGR16/WEF_Global_Gender_Gap_Report_2016.pdf (in English)
Walzer, M., & Abramov, M. (Ed.). (2000). On toleration. I. Myurnberg, Trans. from Engl. Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektualnoy knigi. (in Russian)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
