TRANSFORMATION OF THE GENDER DICHOTOMY OF SPIRIT AND BODY IN POSTMODERN PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i14.150751Keywords:
feminism, dualism, ideology, spirituality, corporality, mass cultureAbstract
Purpose. The signification of the theoretical grounds for the conceptual reconstruction of the dichotomy "spirit-body" in the field of postmodern notions in philosophy and culture, the identification of the location of the given dichotomy in the processes of the transition of philosophy from being classical to the postclassical one, simultaneously, culture – to the cultural forms of postmodernity. Theoretical basis. The changing systems of post paradigm relations, radically transforming human life in the postmodern world, represent the obvious transformations of the fundamental conceptual schemes. For postmodern philosophers, the dichotomy "spirit-body" does not mean better interpretation of separate substances any more, but the development of the relationship between mental and physical properties. Feminist philosophers assert that the "spirit-body" opposition occupies the special place among classical dichotomies, as it acquires the key meaning in the patriarchal concepts of masculinity and femininity. In the post modernity, the body and corporality become dominant themes not only in the philosophy and "high" culture, but also in mass culture; at the same time, the emphasis on their common narratives and intertexts testifies to the fundamental transformations that reflect the "condition" of postmodernity. Originality of this research lies in the expose of the specific transformation features of the dichotomy "spirit-body" as a philosophic opposition closely connected with postmodernism and realized in the practices of mass culture. This research is reflectedof the idea of the absoluteness and invariabilityof this duality as thebasicdichotomy of the classical philosophy in its correlation with cultural logic of the postmodernity at the end of the 20 – the beginning of the 21st centuries. Conclusions. With the reinterpretation of the "spirit-body" dichotomy, the body is theorized as a cognitive agent with desires independent of the mind. In postmodernism, the body is the source of charm, and aversion and destruction, and restoration. At the same time, with the growth of the visualization factor and the change in the status of "high" culture, the "turn" in the status of mass culture is created: today both the former and the letter have many common discourses, narratives and intertexts.
References
Averintsev, S. S. (2001). Sofiya – Logos. Slovar (2 Edit). Kiev: Dukh i Lіtera. (in Russian)
Bauman, Z. (2008). Liquid Modernity. Y. V. Asochakova (Ed.), Trans. from Engl. St. Petersburg: Piter. (in Russian)
Caputo, J. (2015). Truth: Philosophy in Transit. London: Penguin Books. (in English)
Cixous, H., & Clément, C. (1975). La Jeune Nee. Paris: Union Generaled' Editions. (in French)
Deleuze, G. (1998). Razlichie i povtorenie. N. B. Mankovskaya, & E. P. Yurovskaya, Trans. from French. St. Petersburg: Petropolis. (in Russian)
Deleuze, G. (2001). Empirisme et subjectivite: Essai sur la nature humaineselon Hume. Y. I. Svirskiy, Trans. from French. Moscow: PER SE. (in Russian)
Deleuze, G. (2011). Logique du sens. Y. I. Svirskiy, Trans. from French. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt. (in Russian)
Eco, U. (2009). La ricercadella lingua perfetta nella cultura Europea. A. Mirolyubova, Trans. St. Petersburg: Alexandria. (in Russian)
Garri, E., & Pirsel, M. (2005). Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy. O. V. Dvorkina, Trans. from Engl. Moscow: Rossiyskaya Politicheskaya Entsiklopediya. (in Russian)
Gerasimov, D. (2016). Po tustoronu odnomernosti. Serdtse i razum v hristianstve. Moscow: Ridero. (in Russian)
Greimas, A. J. (2004). Sémantique structurale: Recherche de méthode. L. Zimina, Trans. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt. (in Russian)
Jameson, F. (2009). Postmodernism or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso Books. (in English)
Kemerov, V. Y. (Ed.). (2004). Modern philosophical dictionary (3 Edit.). Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt. (in Russian)
Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmodern: Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Editions de Minuit. (in French)
Moulton, D. (2005). Mif o neytralnosti slova "man". In E. Garri, & M. Pirsel, Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy (pp. 252-269). O. V. Dvorkina, Trans. from Engl. Moscow: Rossiyskaya Politicheskaya Entsiklopediya. (in Russian)
Pshinko, A. N., & Vlasova, T. I. (2012). Poznanie i ratsionalnost v culture postmoderna. (Opyt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya): Monografiya. Dnipropetrovsk: Makovetskiy. (in Russian)
Roberts, M. V. (2010). Dualities: A theology of difference. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press. (in English)
Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind: 60th anniversary edition. London: Routledge; New York: Taylor & Francis Group. (in English)
Simon, W. (1996). Postmodern sexualities. London and New York: Routledge. (in English)
Solovev, Y. A. (1905). Aleksandr Gertsen: Yego zhizn i literaturnaya deyatlnost (2 Edit.). St. Petersburg: F. Pavlenkova. (in Russian)
Svirskiy, J. (2001). Filosofstvovat posredi… . In G. Deleuze, Empirisme et subjectivite. La philosophie critique de Kant. Le Bergsonisme. Spinoza (p. 445). Trans. Moscow: PER SE. (in Russian)
Tanney, G. (2009). Rethinking Ryle: A Critical Discussion of the Concept of Mind. In G. Ryle, Theconcept of mind: 60th anniversary edition (pp. 9-57). London: Routledge; New York: Taylor & Francis Group. (in English)
Vlasova, T. І. (2013). Femіnіstska epіstemolohіia і "fіlosofіia dualnostі". Ukrainoznavchyi almanakh, 11, 132-134. (in Ukrainian)
Žižek, S. (2014). Event: A philosophical journey through a concept. London: Penguin Books. (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).