MORAL SEARCH IN MULTICULTURAL COMMUNICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i14.150545Keywords:
multiculturalism, morality, dialogue, moral search, "negative ethics", "ethics of opportunities", toleranceAbstract
Purpose of the work is to identify and justify the moral priorities in multicultural communication. Theoretical basis is the works of foreign and Ukrainian authors, revealing the main approaches to the problem of multiculturalism; studies on ethics and philosophical anthropology that define the problem field in the anthropo-logy of morality. The work uses: the conceptual provisions of phenomenology – for the disclosure of the semantic uncertainty of human existence as a prerequisite of moral search; existential philosophy – to substantiate the essential relationship of a man and culture. Originality of the results obtained consists of 1) understanding multiculturalism as a "dialogue of people" (V. Mezhuev), in which the moral search of every person is actualized; 2) in justifying the demand for inter-individual communication of "negative" ethics (A. Guseynov): its requirement not to commit immoral acts stimulates a person to moral search, reveals the specifics of the existence of a "person navigator" (S. Smirnov); 3) in the definition of intercultural communication as the creation of opportunities for the search for tolerant (non-conflict) forms of existence. Conclusions: 1) multiculturalism is a contradictory phenomenon, producing conflicts and creating prerequisites for overcoming them; 2) the possibilities of non-conflict existence in a situation of multiculturalism arise in inter-individual communication, which is a situation of moral search for every person; 3) "ethics of opportunities" unites universal and situational moral norms in multicultural communication: people enable each other to remain people; 4) "ethics of opportunities" creates conditions for tolerant (non-conflict) interaction between people and cultures.
References
Benhabib, S. (2003). Prityazaniya kultury. Ravenstvo i raznoobrazie v globalnuyu eru. V. L. Inozemtsev (Ed.), Trans. from Engl. Moscow: Logos. (in Russian)
Bernstein, R. (1994). Dictatorship of virtue: Multiculturalism and the battle for America’s future. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (in English)
Dobiaš, D. (2018). The idea of liberalism in the pragmatic perspective of searching freedom and a better world. Political Science, 21(3), 32-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2018.21.3.32-54 (in Slovak)
Epshteyn, M. (2004). Znak probela. O budushchem gumanitarnykh nauk. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (in Russian)
Guseynov, A. A. (2007). Negativnaya etika. Izbrannye lektsii universiteta. Retrieved from https://guseinov.ru/publ/Negat_eth.html (in Russian)
Habermas, J. (2001). Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoy teorii. D. A. Sklyadnev (Ed.), Y. S. Medvedev, Trans. from German. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian)
Jonas, H. (2001). Pryntsyp vidpovidalnosti. U poshukakh etyky dlia tekhnolohichnoi tsyvilizatsii. A. Yermolenko, & V. Yermolenko, Trans. from German. Kyev: Libra. (in Ukrainian)
Laidlaw, J. (2014). The subject of virtue: An anthropology of ethics and freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (in English)
Maclure, J. (2015). Multiculturalism on the back seat? Culture, religion, and justice. The Ethics Forum, 10(2), 141-146. doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/1035333ar (in English)
Mattingly, C., Dyring, R., Louw, M., & Wentzer, T. (Eds.). (2018). Moral engines: Exploring the ethical drives in human life (Vol. 5). New York: Berghahn Books. (in English)
Mezhuev, V. (2015). Dialog kak sposob mezhkulturnogo obshcheniya v sovremennom mire. In A. S. Zapesotskiy (Ed.), Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya. Globalizatsiya i dialog kultur. Izbrannye doklady (1995–2015) (pp. 161-171). St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences. (in Russian)
Nediukha, M. P., & Zharkov, V. O. (2015). Multykulturalizm yak poniattia suchasnoi sotsiohumanitarnoi nauky. In A. M. Podoliaka (Ed.), Multykulturalizm yak sotsialno-pravove yavyshche: vyklyky hlobalizovanoho svitu (pp. 4-8). Kyiv: Art-tekhnolohiia. (in Ukrainian)
Parekh, B. (1999). Common citizenship in multicultural societies. The Round Table, 88(351), 449-460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/003585399107983 (in English)
Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (in English)
Parekh, B. (2002). Barry and the Dangers of Liberalism. In P. Kelly (Ed.), Multiculturalism Reconsidered: "Culture and equality" and its critics (pp. 133-150). Cambridge: Polity Press; Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. (in English)
Smirnov, S. A. (2017). Anthropological navigation. Introduction in concept. Chelovek.RU, 12, 159-195. (in Russian)
Tabachkovskyi, V. H. (2005). Polisutnisne homo: Filosofsko-mystetska dumka v poshukakh "neevklidovoi reflektyvnosti". Kyiv: Parapan. (in Ukrainian)
Taylor, C. (2002). Demokraticheskoe isklyuchenie (i "lekarstvo" ot nego?). In V. S. Malakhov, & V. A. Tiskov, (Eds.), Multikulturalizm i transformatsiya postsovetskikh obshchestv (pp. 11-37). Moscow: IEiA, IPhRAS. (in Russian)
Taylor, C. (2004). Multykulturalizm i "Polityka vyznannia". Trans. from Engl. Kyiv: Alterpres. (in Ukrainian)
Tlostanova, M. V. (2003). Era Agasfera, ili Kak sdelat chitateley menee schastlivymi. Inostrannaya literaturа, 1, 238-251. (in Russian)
Vitikainen, A. (2015). The limits of liberal multiculturalism. Towards an individuated approach to cultural diversity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. (in English)
Vysotska, N. O. (2009). Kontseptsiia multykulturalizmu i pytannia estetyky. Pytannia literaturoznavstva, 77, 110-121. (in Ukrainian)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).