MORAL SEARCH IN MULTICULTURAL COMMUNICATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i14.150545

Keywords:

multiculturalism, morality, dialogue, moral search, "negative ethics", "ethics of opportunities", tolerance

Abstract

Purpose of the work is to identify and justify the moral priorities in multicultural communication. Theoretical basis is the works of foreign and Ukrainian authors, revealing the main approaches to the problem of multiculturalism; studies on ethics and philosophical anthropology that define the problem field in the anthropo-logy of morality. The work uses: the conceptual provisions of phenomenology – for the disclosure of the semantic uncertainty of human existence as a prerequisite of moral search; existential philosophy – to substantiate the essential relationship of a man and culture. Originality of the results obtained consists of 1) understanding multiculturalism as a "dialogue of people" (V. Mezhuev), in which the moral search of every person is actualized; 2) in justifying the demand for inter-individual communication of "negative" ethics (A. Guseynov): its requirement not to commit immoral acts stimulates a person to moral search, reveals the specifics of the existence of a "person navigator" (S. Smirnov); 3) in the definition of intercultural communication as the creation of opportunities for the search for tolerant (non-conflict) forms of existence. Conclusions: 1) multiculturalism is a contradictory phenomenon, producing conflicts and creating prerequisites for overcoming them; 2) the possibilities of non-conflict existence in a situation of multiculturalism arise in inter-individual communication, which is a situation of moral search for every person; 3) "ethics of opportunities" unites universal and situational moral norms in multicultural communication: people enable each other to remain people; 4) "ethics of opportunities" creates conditions for tolerant (non-conflict) interaction between people and cultures.

Author Biography

I. A. Donnikova, National University "Odessa Maritime Academy" (Odessa, Ukraine)

National University "Odessa Maritime Academy" (Odessa, Ukraine),
Email: donnikova_iran@ukr.net

I. A. Donnikova

References

Benhabib, S. (2003). Prityazaniya kultury. Ravenstvo i raznoobrazie v globalnuyu eru. V. L. Inozemtsev (Ed.), Trans. from Engl. Moscow: Logos. (in Russian)

Bernstein, R. (1994). Dictatorship of virtue: Multiculturalism and the battle for America’s future. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (in English)

Dobiaš, D. (2018). The idea of liberalism in the pragmatic perspective of searching freedom and a better world. Political Science, 21(3), 32-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2018.21.3.32-54 (in Slovak)

Epshteyn, M. (2004). Znak probela. O budushchem gumanitarnykh nauk. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (in Russian)

Guseynov, A. A. (2007). Negativnaya etika. Izbrannye lektsii universiteta. Retrieved from https://guseinov.ru/publ/Negat_eth.html (in Russian)

Habermas, J. (2001). Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoy teorii. D. A. Sklyadnev (Ed.), Y. S. Medvedev, Trans. from German. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian)

Jonas, H. (2001). Pryntsyp vidpovidalnosti. U poshukakh etyky dlia tekhnolohichnoi tsyvilizatsii. A. Yermolenko, & V. Yermolenko, Trans. from German. Kyev: Libra. (in Ukrainian)

Laidlaw, J. (2014). The subject of virtue: An anthropology of ethics and freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (in English)

Maclure, J. (2015). Multiculturalism on the back seat? Culture, religion, and justice. The Ethics Forum, 10(2), 141-146. doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/1035333ar (in English)

Mattingly, C., Dyring, R., Louw, M., & Wentzer, T. (Eds.). (2018). Moral engines: Exploring the ethical drives in human life (Vol. 5). New York: Berghahn Books. (in English)

Mezhuev, V. (2015). Dialog kak sposob mezhkulturnogo obshcheniya v sovremennom mire. In A. S. Zapesotskiy (Ed.), Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya. Globalizatsiya i dialog kultur. Izbrannye doklady (1995–2015) (pp. 161-171). St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences. (in Russian)

Nediukha, M. P., & Zharkov, V. O. (2015). Multykulturalizm yak poniattia suchasnoi sotsiohumanitarnoi nauky. In A. M. Podoliaka (Ed.), Multykulturalizm yak sotsialno-pravove yavyshche: vyklyky hlobalizovanoho svitu (pp. 4-8). Kyiv: Art-tekhnolohiia. (in Ukrainian)

Parekh, B. (1999). Common citizenship in multicultural societies. The Round Table, 88(351), 449-460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/003585399107983 (in English)

Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (in English)

Parekh, B. (2002). Barry and the Dangers of Liberalism. In P. Kelly (Ed.), Multiculturalism Reconsidered: "Culture and equality" and its critics (pp. 133-150). Cambridge: Polity Press; Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. (in English)

Smirnov, S. A. (2017). Anthropological navigation. Introduction in concept. Chelovek.RU, 12, 159-195. (in Russian)

Tabachkovskyi, V. H. (2005). Polisutnisne homo: Filosofsko-mystetska dumka v poshukakh "neevklidovoi reflektyvnosti". Kyiv: Parapan. (in Ukrainian)

Taylor, C. (2002). Demokraticheskoe isklyuchenie (i "lekarstvo" ot nego?). In V. S. Malakhov, & V. A. Tiskov, (Eds.), Multikulturalizm i transformatsiya postsovetskikh obshchestv (pp. 11-37). Moscow: IEiA, IPhRAS. (in Russian)

Taylor, C. (2004). Multykulturalizm i "Polityka vyznannia". Trans. from Engl. Kyiv: Alterpres. (in Ukrainian)

Tlostanova, M. V. (2003). Era Agasfera, ili Kak sdelat chitateley menee schastlivymi. Inostrannaya literaturа, 1, 238-251. (in Russian)

Vitikainen, A. (2015). The limits of liberal multiculturalism. Towards an individuated approach to cultural diversity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. (in English)

Vysotska, N. O. (2009). Kontseptsiia multykulturalizmu i pytannia estetyky. Pytannia literaturoznavstva, 77, 110-121. (in Ukrainian)

Published

2018-12-11

How to Cite

Donnikova, I. A. (2018). MORAL SEARCH IN MULTICULTURAL COMMUNICATION. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (14), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i14.150545

Issue

Section

TOPICAL ISSUES OF PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY