RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i13.132592

Keywords:

anthropocentrism, postmodernity, humanism, dialectics, principles, objectivity, systematics, comprehensiveness, historism

Abstract

Purpose. To update the question of using the biographical method and establishing its interrelation with other scientific methods and methodological principles in historical and anthropological research. Theoretical basis. Consideration of the biographical method in historical and anthropological studios carried out in the course of the general theoretical "renaissance" of classical humanitarianism, which is largely due to the uncertainty and ambiguity of theoretical discourses and discursive practices of postmodernism, pose to the researcher a number of new tasks. Among them there is "discovery of the implicit" i.e. not just the description of the results of human cultural activity in the immediate given, but the disclosure of sometimes unconscious mechanisms of this activity, of the deep "springs" of culture that ensure its movement. Originality. The authors of this research do not touch on the sociological issues of biographical research, which are widely represented in the writings of contemporary Western researchers. The subject of our message is a biographical method that is genetically derived from Ch. A. Sainte-Beuve, who believed that the main task of the biographer is to carry out an analysis of the personality of a prominent person. The research in the realm of humanities in general and in civil history in particular should take into account not only the changes in the sociocultural aspects of being, but also the corresponding transformation of methodological approaches to the analysis of the epiphenomena of "fluid modernity". This obvious fact led us to an understanding of the need for a historiosophical study of the problem of reception of a biographical method in historical and anthropological works with the subsequent historical, philosophical, cultural representation of the biographical method. Conclusions. The historiosophical transformations of the last decades, with their radical change in concepts, methods and techniques, return the researcher to the improvement of the biographical methodology that today represents anthropocentrism, which fills the science with humanistic content. The use of this methodology requires from a scientist to adhere to the basic methodological principles and mastering other scientific methods, primarily dialectics.

Author Biographies

T. I. Vlasova, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan

Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan (Dnipro),
Email: vasovat2@gmail.com

G. G. Krivtchik, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan

Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan (Dnipro),
Email: gena.crivchik@ukr.net

References

Aitov, S. S. (2010). Metodology approaches of the European and Ukrainian historical-anthropological research: Genesis and development. Humanitarnyi Zhurnal, 3-4, 60-64. (in Ukrainian)

Belan, H. V. (2013). Biographical method in the historical and pedagogical science: The leading trends of formation. Pedagogical Discourse, 15, 50-54. (in Ukrainian)

Bibliia. Knyhy Sviatoho Pysma Staroho i Novoho Zavitu. Ekkleziiast (Section 1), I. Ohiienko, Trans. Ukr. (2017). Retrieved from https://bible.ggwo.org.ua/ua/21/01/ (in Ukrainian)

Caputo, J. (2013). Truth: Philosophy in Transit. London: Penguin Books. (in English)

Chyshko, V. S. (1996). Biohrafichna tradytsiia ta naukova biohrafiia v istorii i suchasnosti Ukrainy. Kyev: BMT. (in Ukrainian)

Devyatko, I. F. (1998). Metody sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University. (in Russian)

Fuko, M. (2004). Chto takoe avtor? In I. V. Kabanova, Sovremennaya literaturnaya teoriya. Antologiya (pp. 69-91). Moscow: Flinta: Nauka. (in Russian)

Izer, V. (2004). Izmenenie funktsiy literatury. In Sovremennaya literaturnaya teoriya. Antologiya (pp. 24-44). I. V. Kabanova, Trans. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka. (in Russian)

Kantor, K. (2017). Motsart sotsiologii. Retrieved from http://www.zinoviev.ru/ru/zinoviev-kantor3.html (in Russian)

Karamzin, N. M. (1988). Istoriya Gosudarstva Rossiyskogo: Reprintnoe vosproizvedenie izdanie pyatogo, vypushchennogo v 3 knigakh s prilozheniem "Klyucha" P. M. Stroeva (Book 1, Vol. 1). Moscow: Kniga. (in Russian)

Konverskyi, A., Lubskyi, V., Horbachenko, T., Buhrov, V., Kondratieva, I., Rudenko, O., & Yushtyn, K. (2010). Osnovy metodolohii ta orhanizatsii naukovykh doslidzhen: Navchalnyi posibnyk. Kyiv: Center of Educational Literature. (in Ukrainian)

Kostomarov, N., & Savilova T. (Ed.). (2011). Russkaya istoriya v zhizneopisaniyakh ee glavneyshikh deyateley. Moscow: AST. (in Russian)

Kovalchenko, I. D. (2003). Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya (2 Edit.). Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)

Krypiakevych, I., Shevchenko, F., Butych, I., & Isaievych, Y. (Eds.). (1980). Bohdan Khmelnytskyi (2 Edit.). Lviv: Svit. (in Ukrainian)

Manfred, A. Z. (1986). Napoleon Bonapart (4 Edit.). Moscow: Myisl. (in Russian)

Mogilnitskiy, B. G. (1989). Vvedenie v metodologiyu istorii. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. (in Russian)

Molchanov, N. N. (1980). General de Goll. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (in Russian)

Nechkina, M. V. (1974). Vasiliy Osipovich Klyuchevskiy. Istoriya zhizni i tvorchestva: Monografіya. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)

Neiman, S. (2016). Why Grow Up? London: Penguin Books. (in English)

Perry, K. (2015). Philosophy. USA: Zephyros Press. (in English)

Pylypenko, V., Pryvalov, Y., & Nikolaievskyi, V. (2008). Vladna elita u konteksti suspilnoho rozvytku. Vidpovidalnist. Kyiv: Foliant. (in Ukrainian)

Roberbs, B. (2002). Biographical Research. Philadelphia: Open University Press. (in English)

Santsevich, A. V. (1990). Metodika istoricheskogo issledovaniya (2 Edit.). Kiev: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)

Sent-Bev, S. (1970). Literaturnye portrety. Kriticheskie ocherk. Trans. from French. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (in Russian)

Sharoshkina, N. (2012). Biographical Method in Educational Work as the Analysis of Lifes Way of Human. Pedahohika ta Psykholohiia Profesiinoi Osvity, 4, 114-122. (in Ukrainian)

Sharov, I. F. (1999). 100 vydatnykh imen Ukrainy. Kyev: Alternatyvy. (in Ukrainian)

Tymchuk, L. I. (2015). Methodic of digital biographical narratives creation in pedagogical education. Pedahohichni Nauky: Teoriia, Istoriia, Innovatsiini Tekhnolohii, 5, 389-405. (in Ukrainian)

Yavornytskyi, D. I., Sokhan, P. S., (Ed.). et. al. (1990). Istoriia zaporozkykh kozakiv (Vol. 2, p. 560). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. (in Ukrainian)

Zhizn zamechatelnykh lyudey: Vikipediya. Retrieved from https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhizn_zamechatelnyih_lyudey (in Russian)

Zinovev, A. A. (1974). The Gaping Heights. Retrieved from http://www.zinoviev.ru/rus/textheights.pdf (in Russian)

Zinovev, A. A. (1989). Katastroika. The story about perestroika in Partgrad. Retrieved from http://www.zinoviev.ru/ru/zinoviev/textkatastroika.pdf (in Russian)

Zizek, S. (2017). The Courage of Hopelessness: Chronicles of a Year of Acting Dangerously. London: Allen Lane. (in English)

Published

2018-05-30

How to Cite

Vlasova, T. I., & Krivtchik, G. G. (2018). RECEPTION OF THE BIOGRAPHICAL METHOD IN HISTORICAL AND ANTHROPOGICAL STUDIES. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (13), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i13.132592

Issue

Section

ANTHROPOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY