PHILOSOPHY OF WAR AND PEACE: IN SEARCH OF NEW EUROPEAN SECURITY STRATEGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119153Keywords:
European Security Strategy, philosophy of war, philosophy of peace, USSR collapse, Russian aggression, international relationsAbstract
Introduction. The contemporary European social and cultural landscape feels the pressure of security challenges. It is true, that Europe has a strategy of overcoming the possible challenges, but it has sense to review ones strategy abilities to be effective at the face of new manifestations of aggression. Methodology. The authors use heuristic philosophical methodology which can make mentioned strategy more holistic having clear vision of the essence of war and peace phenomena. The research is going to perform precious conceptualization of the strategy contours initiated at the previous publications of O. Bazaluk. Originality. Authors defined the series “fatal” mistakes of the European Security Strategy and formulated the list of objectives of the revised security strategy. Conclusions. Five key objectives of perspective European Security Strategy were formulated. The first objective should include the complex measures for the identification, registration and organization of the system of preventive work with mentalities, in which the pathologies in the structure and function of the neural ensembles of subconsciousness and consciousness are clearly expressed that refract the active principle (as natural force) in aggressive manifestations. The second one should include the complex measures ensuring control over the direction of the physicochemical, predisposing, provoking and supporting factors of the external environment that have a direct impact on the manifestations of a mental space in ontogeny. The third objective should include the complex measures of prediction and solution of international (interstate) conflicts. The fourth objective of the security strategy should be aimed at eliminating the cause of war. The fifth objective should provide the complex measures involving the peaceful extension of comfortable conditions for the full realization of its internal creative potentials by a mental space.
References
A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy. Brussels. (December 12, 2003). Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf. (In English)
Andruschenko, V., & Saveliev, V. (2016). Commentary Pedagogical Constitution of Europe. Interdisciplinary Studies of Complex Systems, 8, 30-32. (In English)
Aquinas, T. (2017). The Summa Theologica. Retrieved from http://www.newadvent.org/summa/index.html. (In English)
Bazaluk, O. (2017). The Problem of War and Peace: а Historical and Philosophical Analysis. Philosophy and Cosmology, 18, 85-103. (In English)
Bazaluk, O. (2017). The Theory of War and Peace: The Geophilosophy of Europe. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. (In English)
Bergson, H. (1977). The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (In English)
Blattman, C., & Miguel, E. (2010). Civil War. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 3-57. (In English)
Cheibub, J. A. (2010). Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice, 143, 67-101. (In English)
Vicario, M. Del, Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, N. E., … & Quattrociocchia, W. (2016). The Spreading of Misinformation Online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(3), 554-559. (In English)
Dittmer, J. (2014). Geopolitical Assemblages and Complexity. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 385-401. (In English)
Erasmus, D. (1917). The Complaint of Peace. Translated from the Querela Pacis (A.D. 1521) of Erasmus. Chicago: Open Court. Retrieved from http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/erasmus-the-complaint-of-peace. (In English)
Gomilko, O., Svyrydenko, D., & Terepyshchyi, S. (2016). Hybridity in the Higher Education of Ukraine: Global Logic or Local Idiosyncrasy?. Philosophy and Cosmology, 17, 177-199. (In English)
Hegel, G. W. F. (1990). Philosophy of Rights. Moscow: Mysl. (In English)
Kant, I. (1963-1966). Works in Six Volumes. Moscow: Mysl. Retrieved from http://publ.lib.ru/ARCHIVES/K/KANT_Immanuil/_Kant_I..html. (In English)
Klepko, S. (2017). Pedagogy of Peace and Philosophy of War: the Search for Truth. Future Human Image, (7), 46-49. (In English)
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the Threads: How Five Moral Concerns (Especially Purity) Help Explain Culture War Attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, (46), 184-194. (In English)
Baldwin, D. A. (Ed.). (1993). Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary. Debate. New York: Columbia University Press. (In English)
Novikov, G. (1996). Theories of International Relations. Irkutsk: Irkutsk University Press. Retrieved from http://www.twirpx.com/file/42501/. (In English)
Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy. Brussels, December 11, 2008. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/reports/104630.pdf. (In English)
Schaff, Ph. (1887). Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. Vol. II St. Augustin’s City of God and Christian Doctrine. Buffalo: The Christian Literature Co. Retrieved from http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/schaff-a-select-library-of-the-nicene-and-post-nicene-fathers-of-the-christian-church-vol-2. (In English)
Svyrydenko, D. (2016). Mobility Turn in Contemporary Society as an Educational Challenge. Future Human Image, 3(6), 102-108. (In English)
Terepyshchyi, S. (2016). The Concept of «Knowledge Society» in the Context of Information Era. Studia Warmińskie, (53), 77-84. (In English)
The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription. In Congress. July 4, 1776. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html. (In English)
Towards a New European Security Strategy? Assessing the Impact of Changes in the Global Security Environment. Directorate-General for External Policies. Policy Department, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/534989/EXPO_STU(2015)534989_EN.pdf. (In English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).