WILL TO TRUTH IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF PRAGMATISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119138Keywords:
human, truth, will to truth, "will to believe", pragmatism, existentialAbstract
Purpose. Since the clear statement of the will-to-truth question as an existential has not been fulfilled before, this article is devoted to the solution of such a task. In connection with the above, the purpose of the study is to analyze the phenomenon of will to truth in the philosophy of pragmatism. This involves the following tasks: the definition of the basic principles of understanding the truth in the works of theorists of pragmatism; analysis of the phenomenon of «will to believe» in pragmatism; development and selection of the phenomenon of will to truth, its essence and factors within the framework of pragmatic philosophy. Methodology. The author used analytical, comparative and phenomenological methods in the research. Originality. For the first time, the paper articulates the existential of the will to truth, its essence and factors on the subject of the philosophy of pragmatism. Conclusions. The analysis of the phenomenon of «will to believe» in pragmatism proves that it can be interpreted as «will to truth», because belief in truth of something in pragmatism is inseparable from the truth itself and practice. Within the framework of pragmatic philosophy, the author has determined the essence of will-to-truth phenomenon, which is understood as the aspiration of man to a stable and relevant to reality and his own goals persuasion in relation to himself and reality. The main factors of this phenomenon in pragmatism are doubts (doubts are defined as a prerequisite for the establishment of belief (beliefs), which gives a person confidence in the positive decision of certain life tasks) and persistent belief (truth) that enables a person to succeed and achieve his goals. That is precisely the result of the man's will to truth: the existence of man is determined by the fact that a person prefers to know how to act.
References
Vitgensheyn, L. (2003). Filosofskie issledovaniya. Yazyiki kak obraz mira. Moskow: «Izdatelstvo AST»; Saint-Petersburg: Terra Fantastica. (In Russian)
Dakhigg, Ch. (2016). Syla zvychky. Kharkiv: KSD. (In Ukrainian)
Dzheyms, V. (1910). Pragmatizm. Saint-Petersburg: Shipovnik. (In Russian)
Dzheyms, U. (1997). Volya k vere. Moskow: Respublika. (In Russian)
Dyui, D. (2003). Rekonstruktsiya v filosofii. Moskow: Respublika. (In Russian)
Kalashyan, A. L. (2011). Opravdanie filosofii, ili filosofskaya istina i psevdofilosofskaya lozh. Voprosyi filosofii, 5, 99–107. Retrieved from http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=320. (In Russian)
Logvinov, E. V. (2016). Pragmatizm i neopragmatizm: rekonstruktsiya ucheniya Dzh. Dyui u R. Rorti. Voprosyi filosofii, 2. Retrieved from http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1353. (In Russian)
Malivskiy, A. N. (2013). Antropologizatsiya bazovogo proekta Dekarta v sovremennoy istoriko-filosofskoy literature. Sententiae, 18(1), 51-63. (In Russian)
Pirs, Ch. S. (1996). Zakreplenie verovaniya. Voprosyi filosofii, 12, 106-120. (In Russian)
Pirs, Ch. S. (2000). Kak sdelat nashi idei yasnyimi (pp. 266-295). In Izbrannyie filosofskie proizvedeniya. Moskow: Logos. (In Russian)
Pirs, Ch. S. (2001). Printsipyi filosofii, V. 2. Saint-Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obschestvo. (In Russian)
Pirs, Ch. S. (1996). Kak sdelat nashi idei yasnyimi. Voprosyi filosofii, 12, 120–132. (In Russian)
Prepotenska, M. P. (2006). Ekzystentsiini vymiry rytoryky (Dys. kand. filos. nauk). Instytut filosofii im. H. S. Skovorody NAN Ukrainy, Kiyv. (In Ukrainian)
Snitko, D. Y. (2017). Volia do istyny yak predmet filosofii. «Antropolohichni vymiry filosofskykh doslidzhen»: tezy VI Mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii (pp. 41-44). Dnipro. (In Ukrainian)
Shiller, F. (2003). Nashi chelovecheskie istinyi. Moskow: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskih issledovaniy. (In Russian)
Atkins, R. K. (2015). Peirces «Paradoxical Irradiations» and Jamess The Will to Believe. Transaction of the Charles S. Pierce Society, 51(2), 173–200. (In English)
Bouveresse , J. (2014). Le désir, la vérité et la connaissance: la volonté de savoir et la volonté de vérité chez Foucault. La reconstruction de la raison. Dialogues avec Jacques Bouveresse. Philosophie de la connaissance. Paris. Retrieved from http://books.openedition.org/cdf/3507. (In French)
Christian, R. A. (2005). Truth and consequences in James «The Will To Believe». International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 58, 1–26. (In English)
Dunham, J. (2015). Idealism, pragmatism, and the will to believe: Charles Renouvier and William James. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23(4), 756-778. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2014.1002074. (In English)
McWilliams, S. A. (2009). William James pragmatism and PCP. Personal Construct Theory & Practice, 6, 109–119. Retrieved from http://www.pcpnet.org/journal/pctp09/mcwilliams091.pdf. (In English)
Terrel, J. (2012). De la critique de la volonté de vérité au courage de la vérité. Cahiers philosophiques, 130, 7–28. (In French)
Southworth, J. (2016). The Passional Nature and the Will to Believe. Transaction of the Charles S. Pierce Society, 52(1), 62-78. (In English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).