CHARITY IN THE PROCESS OF FORMING THE HUMANIST AXIOSPHERE OF CIVIL SOCIETY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119126Keywords:
charity, civil society, humanism, eupraskophy, hierarchical pyramid of charity, active charityAbstract
Purpose. The research characterizes the charity as part of civil society, which develops based on humanism in modern society. Methodology of the article is based on the complex direction of research in the dialectical interaction of the triad of a single, a special and a general that allowed to consider certain phenomena in development and interconnection, unity and contradiction, in particular, in the study and analysis of individual concepts. The author used the method of abstraction and induction with the purpose of imaginary departure from the nonessential properties and connections characterizing individual concepts, with simultaneous isolation of their most important features. Originality. The author for the first time in this work has designated the interrelation between methodological approaches and diverse practical versions of the development of charity and the opportunities of civil society based on the humanistic principle. The paper presents the developed and ready for use hierarchical pyramid of charity, the criteria for placing elements of which is the creation of the most favorable conditions for the practical development of human in general and his humanistic qualities in particular, which is directly correlated with the Maslow pyramid of needs. The author has introduced and explained the notion of «active charity», as an activity that comprehensively solves social problems. Conclusions. Charity, as an institutional and resource component of civic activity, acts as one of the practical ways of building a society on the humanity principles. However, not all forms of charity are equally effective. Representatives of active charity, the highest level of the hierarchical structure of charity, are financially stable, conscious individuals who directly act as practitioners of humanism and become most effective.
References
Andriienko, O. V. (2013). Svitohliadni vymiry demokratychnoho sotsiumu. Donetsk: DonNU. (In Ukrainian)
Bakalchuk, V. (2009). Mekhanizm derzhavnoho stymuliuvannia blahodiinoi diialnosti u sferi kultury: Portal «NISD». Retrieved from http://www.niss.gov.ua/Monitor/june2009/5.htm/. Accessed March 31, 2017. (In Ukrainian)
Bazaluk, O. (2017). The Problem of War and Peace: а Historical and Philosophical Analysis. Philosophy and Cosmology, 18, 85-103. (In English)
Borzenko, I. M., Kuvarkin, V. A., & Kudishina, A. A. (2002). Osnovy sovremennogo gumanizma: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov. Moscow: RGO. Retrieved from http://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-331532.html. Accessed March 31, 2017. (In Russian)
Burkkhardt, Ya. (1996). Kultura Italii v epokhu Vozrozhdeniya: Opyt issledovaniya. Moscow: Intrada. (In Russian)
Krasin, Yu. A. (2015). Novyy gumanizm: metaideologiya innovatsionnoy modernizatsii sotsiuma. Mirovoy sotsialno-politicheskiy protsess i ideologiya gumanizma XXI veka (pp. 77-104). Moscow: Izdatelstvo Rusayns. (In Russian)
Novikov, B. V. (2008). Gumanizm, dukhovnost, v sovremennom informatsionnom obshchestve. Narodna osvіta: elektronne fakhove vidannya, 1(4). Retrieved from https://narodnaosvita.kiev.ua/Narodna_osvita/vupysku/4/statti/1novikov.htm. Accessed March 31, 2017. (In Ukrainian)
Hovnannisyan, H. (2016). Idea and Models of Civil Society: Development Tendencies, Arguments Pro and Con. ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314866578_Idea_and_Models_of_Civil_Society_Development_Tendencies_Arguments_Pro_and_Con. Accessed March 31, 2017. (In English)
Kurtz, P. (1997). The courage to become: the virtues of humanism. Westport, Conn.: Praeger. (In English)
Lamont, C. (1961). The philosophy of humanism. London. (In English)
Smith, W. A. (2000). Who's who in hell: A handbook a. international directory for humanists, freethinkers, naturalists, rationalists a. non-theists. New York. (In English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).