THE PHENOMENON OF NEGATIVE EMOTIONS IN THE SOCIAL EXISTENCE OF HUMAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i14.115314Keywords:
phenomenon, human, emotion, feelings, anthropology, morality, behaviourAbstract
Purpose. The research is aimed at determining the influence of negative ethical emotions on social life and the activity of the individual, which involves solving the following problems: a) to find out approaches to the typology of ethical emotions, b) to highlight individual negative ethical emotions and to determine their ability to influence human behaviour. Theoretical basis. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is the recognition of the significant influence of negative emotions on human activity in society. In this regard, it is proposed to consider them as a complex multidisciplinary phenomenon, which is predetermined by both social and personal factors of origin and has a certain specificity of objectification. Originality. The authors determined that in addition to destructive effects on a person of negative emotions, they can also have a constructive effect on person’s behaviour, due primarily to the fact that a person does not want to experience these emotions and therefore tries to avoid situations they cause. Conclusions. The ethical emotions of guilt, embarrassment, anger, disgust and contempt can affect, through the cognitive aspect of the emotional process, the decision-making process of people when they predict situations in which they risk to feel such emotions. So the emotion of guilt creates a constructive setup aimed at correcting inappropriate social norms of human behaviour. The emotion of embarrassment motivates a person to behave more benevolently in society in order to integrate in it and get its approval, thus encouraging the person to adhere to social and moral agreements and norms. The emotion of anger motivates a person to act to eliminate injustice, herewith not only in relation to himself, but also in relation to others. Rejecting those people who cause moral and social aversion, society creates a system of punishments and rewards that acts as a strong deterrent to the socio-cultural behaviour. The emotion of contempt performs the function of preventing punishment in relation to the despised individual.
References
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. (2013). Behavioral economics and the retirement savings crisis. Science, 339(6124), 1152-1153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231320 (in English)
Bgazhnokov, B. (2009). Antropologiya morali. Nalchik: Izdatelskiy otdel KBIGI. (in Russian)
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/10001-000 (in English)
Frijda, N. (2001). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (in English)
Gintis, H. (2014). The bounds of reason. Game theory and the unification of the behavioral sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851348 (in English)
Gjerstad, S., & Smith, V. (2014). Rethinking housing bubbles. The role of household and bank balance sheets in modeling economic cycles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979194 (in English)
Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). New York: Oxford University Press. (in English)
Khmarskyi, V., & Pavlov, R. (2017). Relation between marketing expenses and bank’s financial position: Ukrainian reality. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(4), 903-933. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2016-0026 (in English)
Khmil, V. V., & Khmil, T. V. (2015). Anthropological aspect of the nature of the state. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 7, 7-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2015/43374 (in Ukrainian)
Levy, R. (1984). Emotion, knowing, and culture. In R. Shweder, & R. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 214-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (in English)
Miller, R. (1995). On the nature of embarrassabllity: Shyness, social evaluation, and social skill. Journal of Personality, 63(2), 315-339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00812.x (in English)
Niedenthal, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2006). Psychology of emotion: Interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. New York: Psychology Press. (in English)
Ortony, A., Clore, G., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571299 (in English)
Pavlova, T. (2013). Etychna emotsiia yak osnova prava i morali: Sotsialno-filosofskyi aspekt. Kultura Narodiv Prychornomoria, 245, 179-181. (in Ukrainian)
Petrazycki, L. I. (1907). Teoriya prava i gosudarstva v svyazi s teoriey nravstvennosti (Vol. 1). St. Petersburg: Slovo. (in Russian)
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. (2008). Disgust. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones, & L. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3 Edit., pp. 757-776). New York: Guilford Press. (in English)
Smith, A., & Haakonssen, K. (Ed.). (2002). The theory of moral sentiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800153 (in English)
Tangney, J., Wagner, P., Hill-Barlow, D., Marschall, D., & Gramzow, R. (1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 797-809. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.797 (in English)
Tangney, J., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145 (in English)
Vélez García, A., & Ostrosky-Solís, F. (2006). From morality to moral emotions. International Journal of Psychology, 41(5), 348-354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590500345898 (in English)
Watts, D., & Dodds, P. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441-458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/518527 (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).