DECONSTRUCTION OF THE METAPHYSICS OF PRESENCE IN PHENOMENOLOGY AND STRUCTURALISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105475Keywords:
deconstruction, metaphysics of presence, logocentrism, phonocentrism, phenomenology, structuralismAbstract
Purpose of the work is a description of critical position of J. Derrida on metaphysics of presence in phenomenological and structuralist discourses. As a philosophical strategy, deconstruction tries to destroy a violent hierarchy of terms, in which one term dominates the other according to its ontological or rational sense. Methodology of research is based on J. Derrida’s strategy of deconstruction, which tries to undermine the basic principles of knowledge and Western philosophy existence, for example, the opposition between nature and culture. In terms of J. Derrida, to deconstruct Western philosophy means to explore the tensions and contradictions in text, which should clarify false reliability of accepted hierarchies. The originality of the work lies in the identification of metaphysic of presence problem in structuralist and phenomenological discourses through the deconstruction project. Deconstruction should show instability of logocentrism, which focuses on repression of writing in terms of thought, truth, reason or logic. Conclusions: J. Derrida’s deconstruction appeared as an attempt to overthrow metaphysics and get focused on the concept of writing, which scope is limited by discourse. Deconstruction of metaphysics of presence is a continuous request of legitimacy of the existing logocentrism, and search of its weaknesses, aporias and contradictions, which make impossible the tradition, centered around mind.
References
Azarova, I. O. (2013). Derrida i Delez v sovremennom diskursivnom: pole transtcendentciia versus immanentciia. Totallogy-XXI. Postneklasichnі doslіdzhennia, 30, 336-370.
Gusserl, E. (2009). Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii Kniga pervaia. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt.
Gusserl, E. (1996). Nachalo geometrii. Vvedenie Zhaka Derrida. Moscow: Ad Marginem.
Derrida, Z., Izer, V., & Khartman, D. (1996). Dekonstruktciia: trialog v Ierusalime. Zerkalo, 3-4. Retrieved from http://zerkalo-litart.com/?p=3305
Derrida, Z. (2014). «Golos i fenomen» i drugie raboty po teorii znaka. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiia.
Derrida, Z. (2004). Pysmo ta vidminnist. Kyiv : Osnovy.
Derrida, Z. (1966). Struktura, znak i hra v dyskursi humanitarnykh nauka. In M. Zubrytsk (Ed.), Antolohiia svitovoi literaturno-krytychnoi dumky XX st. (457-477). Lviv.
Yosypenko, O. M. (2012). Vid movy filosofii do filosofii movy: problema movy u frantsuzkii filosofii druhoi polovyny XX – pochatku XXI stolit. Kyiv : Ukrainskyi Tsentr dukhovnoi kultury.
Kosikov, G. (2000). Frantcuzskaia semiotika. Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu. Moscow: Progress.
Fecondo, A. (2012). Derrida and Phenomenology a Critical Analysis of «Voice and Phenomenon». Vesnik NGU. Seriia «Filosofiia», 10(4), 161-167.
Khabermas, Y. (2003). Filosofskii diskurs o moderne. Moscow: «Ves Mir».
Culler, J. (2007). On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism. Cornell University Press.
Norris, C. (2000). Deconstruction: theory and practice. Routledge.
Roo, de N. (2011). Derrida and phenomenology. Derrida Today. Edinburgh University Press, 4.1, 107-131.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).