The Confucian conception of human beings in the pre-Qin period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i29.365980Keywords:
human beings, human person, anthropocentric, Confucian philosophy, pre-Qin thoughtAbstract
Purpose. This article examines and elucidates the conception of human beings within Confucian philosophy during the pre-Qin period. Its implementation involves: a) to elucidate the fundamental views on human beings expressed within pre-Qin Confucian philosophy; b) undertakes the task of explaining why Confucian philosophers of the pre-Qin period concentrated their intellectual efforts on the study of human beings and social relationships rather than on the nature; c) analyzes both the enduring values and the inherent limitations of Confucian anthropological thought in both historical and contemporary contexts. Theoretical basis. The study employs dialectical and historical materialism as its principal methodological approaches, supplemented by additional analytical and synthetic methods. Originality. It becomes evident that Confucian thinkers offered profound and significant reflections on the origin, nature, role, and social position of human beings. These perspectives not only reveal the philosophical sophistication of the period but also exerted a lasting influence on the subsequent development of Confucian thought. Within the Confucian framework, while it is acknowledged that humans are born under Heaven and that human destiny is influenced by Heaven, Confucianism simultaneously emphasizes the importance of human origins and the veneration of ancestors. Heaven operates according to its own principles, while human society follows its own laws, as reflected in the cyclical patterns of history. Conclusions. The present study has elucidated the Confucian conception of human beings during the Pre-Qin period, highlighting the centrality of humans in philosophical reflection. Confucian thinkers placed human beings at the core of ethical and social considerations, emphasizing the essential role of education and moral cultivation in developing human potential. Humans were conceived not merely as components of the natural order but as active agents in sustaining and advancing social life. The Pre-Qin Confucian framework presents a sophisticated philosophical system in which human beings are regarded as the primary locus of moral and social responsibility. Through education and self-cultivation, individuals are believed to possess the capacity to perfect themselves, thereby contributing to the realization of a harmonious and stable society.
References
Farooqui, M. O., Ashok, D., & Hashmi, Z. H. (2025). The Confucian legal tradition: Comparative interactions with Western legal philosophies. African Journal of Religion, Philosophy and Culture, 6(2), 93-113. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-aa_ajrpc_v6_n2_a6 (in English)
Gao, S., & Walayat, A. J. (2021). Confucianism and democracy: Four models of compatibility. Journal of Chinese Humanities, 6(2-3), 213-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/23521341-12340098 (in English)
Guo, Q. (2024). Kernal value orientations of Confucianism. In The spirit of Chinese Confucianism (pp. 167-238). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4799-7_5 (in English)
Li, Y. (2022). Confucian philosophy of family: interpretation or justification? Asian Philosophy, 32(2), 152-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2022.2024346 (in English)
Liu, D. (2024). Differences and integration of political thought between ancient Chinese Confucianism and legalism. Trans/Form/Ação, 47(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n4.e0240042 (in English)
Liu, Y., & Wu, Y. (2024). Confucian thought of "harmony between man and nature" and contemporary society construction. Trans/Form/Ação, 47(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n4.e0240068 (in English)
Muyunda, G., & Yue, L. (2022). Confucius’ Education Thoughts and Its Influence on Moral Education in China. International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL), 2(2), 250-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v2i2.141 (in English)
Ren, F., Wang, J., & Lv, W. (2022). Confucian harmony and the idea of sustainable development in modern society. Trans/Form/Ação, 45(spe2), 37-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45esp2.p37 (in English)
Shuting, L., & Ye, X. (2025). The Knight-Errant and Chinese Martial Arts: The Influence of the Knight-Errant on the Development of Chinese Martial Arts During the Pre-Qin and Han Dynasties. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 25(3), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.25.3.1 (in English)
Wang, G. (2024). 'A cultured man is not a tool': the impact of confucian legacies on the standing of vocational education in China. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 76(1), 179-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.2024590 (in English)
Xu, L. (2024). The Philosophical Culture of the Ming-Qing Period and the Scholarship of Modernity. In G. Wu (Ed.), The Civilization of China and the Civilizations of the World (pp. 339-351). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3678-2_17 (in English)
Yu, J. (2023). How to Realize the Idea of "Virtuous Rule of Law": A Historical and Logical Research Based on Xunzi. Frontiers of History in China, 18(2), 153-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3868/s020-012-023-0009-5 (in English)
Zhu, N., Yang, Z., Cai, S., & Sun, H. (2022). Understanding the differences between Chinese and Western business practices: insights into Confucian philosophy. European Journal of International Management, 17(2-3), 180-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2022.120701 (in English)
Zhu, Q., & Sun, Y. S. (2025). Toward a self-cultivation approach to engineering education: A confucian perspective. In A. Buch & S. H. Christensen (Eds.), Bildung for Engineering Education and Practice: A New Agenda (pp. 197-210). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86581-7_12 (in English)
Ziliotti, E. (2023). An epistemic case for Confucian democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 26(7), 1005-1027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1838736 (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 D. V. Vo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).





