The Idea of the "Self-Made Man" and the Philosophy of Postmodernism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i29.365977Keywords:
individual, personality, self-made man, self-realization, self-affirmation, self-determination, modernity, postmodernity, metanarrativesAbstract
Purpose. This study explores the underestimated potential of postmodern philosophy to understand a modern human and their priorities, particularly through the interpretation of the idea of the "self-made man" (an individual who creates oneself). Through a comparative analysis, the paper examines the conceptualization of human formation as a self-made man in the Enlightenment era and postmodernity context. Theoretical basis. The study is based on analytical and generalizing methods, as well as the works of M. Foucault, J. Baudrillard, J.-F. Lyotard, U. Eco, etc. Originality. Despite the claims regarding narrow opportunities for individual self-determination in postmodernity, the ideal of the "self-made man" remains an integral component of philosophical reflection. It is demonstrated that the postmodern delegitimation of Enlightenment metanarratives entails the rejection of metaphysical discourse. Within this framework, metanarratives gradually lose their appeal, while individuals are increasingly compelled to rely on themselves and independently determine their priorities. People act regardless of their social status, define the goals and sense of their existence, and choose the means of achieving them. The process of becoming a person unfolds in social transformations, the growing complexity of democratic institutions, and the emancipation of individuals seeking to make their lives more meaningful. Conclusions. The search for human emancipation encompasses several stages of social and mental development through self-determination and self-realization, where new attempts to reveal human creative potential emerge. Despite the diversity of approaches, postmodern philosophy demonstrates that the idea capable of uniting humanity lies in the aspiration toward a full existence of the individual as a self-sufficient being. Such understanding of personality, experience, and uniqueness creates more favorable conditions for the formation and realization of one’s own concept of the "self-made man".
References
Baudrillard, J. (1993). The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena (J. Benedict, Trans.). Verso. (in English)
Baudrillard, J. (2004). Simulacres et Simulation (V. Khovkhun, Trans.). Kyiv: Osnovy. (in Ukrainian)
Bazaluk, O. (2023). Discursive Thinking Through of Education: Learning from Those Who Transform the Universe. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003450726 (in English)
Bychko, I. (2000). Postmodern: sproba novoho pidkhodu do problemy svobody. In Filosofsko-antropolohichni chytannia’99 (pp. 60-73). Kyiv: Stylos. (in Ukrainian)
De Keere, K. (2014). From a self-made to an already-made man: A historical content analysis of professional advice literature. Acta Sociologica, 57(4), 311-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699314552737 (in English)
Eco, U. (2006). Il nome della Rosa (M. Prokopovych, Trans.). Kharkiv: Folio. (in Ukrainian)
Farhan, R. (2019). Understanding Postmodernism: Philosophy and Culture of Postmodern [Preprint]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33590.04165 (in English)
Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard. (in French)
Gajbhiye, P. (n.d.). Rethinking Subjectivity in the Postmodern Era and Literature. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/37089670/Rethinking_Subjectivity_in_the_Postmodern_Era_and_Literature (in English)
Gray, J. (2007). Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and the Death of Utopia. Allen Lane. (in English)
Habermas, J. (1968). Technik und Wissenschaft als "Ideologie". Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. (in German)
Kalmykova, L., Kharchenko, N., Kalmykov, H., Mysan, I., & Kotsur, V. (2025). Internal Speech in Natural Discourse Communication: A Systematic Review and Modeling. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 37(1), 93-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2025-37-1-93-123 (in English)
Korkh, O. M., & Khmil, V. V. (2024). Kant’s Philosophy and the Idea of the Self-Made-Man. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (25), 124-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307669 (in English)
Leckelt, M., König, J., Richter, D., Back, M. D., & Schröder, C. (2022). The personality traits of self-made and inherited millionaires. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01099-3 (in English)
Lillie, K., & Tisch, D. (2026). A 'Self-Made' Billionaire? Gender and the Myth of Meritocratic Wealth. Sociology, 60(1), 229-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385251380755 (in English)
Lukasik, J. (2023). Postmodernism – the main ideas and their social and political implications. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University, Philosophy Series, (25), 30-38. (in Ukrainian)
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from https://cssplatformbytha.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/The-Postmodern-Condition-A-Report-on-Knowledge-Jean-Francois-Lyotard.pdf (in English)
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a Psychology of Being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. (in English)
Paul, H. (2014). Expressive Individualism and the Myth of the Self-Made Man. In The Myths That Made America: An Introduction to American Studies (pp. 367-420). transcript Verlag. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1wxsdq.11 (in English)
Shabanova, Y. O. (2023). Metamodern in the ideological interaction of modernity and postmodern. In Worldview explications of modernism and postmodernism: Scientific monograph (pp. 248-272). Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-357-6-14 (in Ukrainian)
Smalko, L., & Panchenko, V. (2020). The Idiom Self-Made Man as a Concept and a Token of the American Culture: Historical Background and Linguocultural Aspect. Linguostylistic Studies, (12), 194-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29038/2413-0923-2020-12-194-202 (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 O. M. Korkh, V. V. Khmil

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).





