The Prospect of Humans Remaining Human in a Post-Information Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i29.365921Keywords:
person of mass information consumption, post-information society, digital identity, transhumanism, gender equality, social inclusionAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to conduct a problem-oriented analytical examination of the current anthropological challenges of the digital age, as well as to explore the prospects for preserving human identity and integrity in the context of intense post-humanistic transformations in the post-information society. Theoretical basis. The theoretical basis of the article consists of the concepts of network society, ideas of rhizomatic development of complex systems, and the concept of the person of mass information consumption. The research is based on the principles of transhumanist philosophy, information ontology, and post-genderism. The research methodology also considers approaches to gender equality, social inclusion, and the principles of digital ethics. Originality. The originality of the study lies in substantiating that the new post-information society is causing a profound anthropological transformation, within which biological corporeality is gradually losing its status as the fundamental basis of human existence, giving way to digital representations and network identities. It has been proven that modern digital subjectivity is a decentralized and hybrid structure that is formed under the influence of algorithmic platforms. The ambivalence of the deconstruction of corporeality has been revealed. It has been established that technological modification of humans simultaneously creates space for their emancipation from natural limitations, but carries critical risks of losing the existential depth of experience, increasing inequality, and the emergence of new forms of digital violence. Conclusions. The conclusions emphasize that the prospect of remaining human in conditions of total digitalization is not guaranteed by biological givens, but arises as a normative and ethical task. Humanity in the post-information age is preserved through the individual’s ability to engage in constant self-reflection, make responsible moral choices, and recognize the dignity of others, regardless of forms of technological representation. It has been established that the key condition for preserving the human dimension of existence is to establish a strict priority of ethical regulations and humanistic values over technological rationality. Only by preserving internal autonomy and responsibility within the limits of network multiplicity can a person achieve new forms of conscious humanistic maturity and avoid becoming a functional appendage to algorithmic systems.
References
Bard, A., & Söderqvist, J. (2018). Digital libido: Sex, power and violence in the network society. Stockholm: Futurica Media. (in English)
Castells, M. (2007). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society (E. H. Hanysh & A. B. Volkova, Trans.). Kyiv: Vakler. (in Ukrainian)
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Introduction: Rhizome. In A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (pp. 3-25). University of Minnesota Press. (in English)
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. (in English)
GSMA. (2021). The mobile gender gap report 2021. Retrieved from https://www.gsma.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/The-Mobile-Gender-Gap-Report-2021.pdf (in English)
Harari, Y. N. (2022). 21 lessons for the 21st century (O. Dem’ianchuk, Trans.). Kyiv: BookChef. (in Ukrainian)
Haraway, D. J. (2016). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Manifestly Haraway (pp. 3-90). University of Minnesota Press. (in English)
Hayles, N. K. (2013). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics (Y. T. Marichev, Trans., 2nd ed.). Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. (in Ukrainian)
Scheler, M. (2018). Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. (in German)
Tolstov, I. V., & Shapoval, V. M. (2025). Person of mass information consumption as a phenomenon of post-information society. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, (27), 66-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i27.333992 (in English)
UK PACT. (2021). Guidance on gender equality and social inclusion (GESI). Retrieved from https://www.ukpact.co.uk/hubfs/cp/general/UK%20PACT%20GESI%20Guidance.pdf (in English)
United Nations Population Fund. (2025, November 26). Technology-facilitated gender-based violence: A growing threat. Retrieved from https://www.unfpa.org/TFGBV (in English)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 V. M. Shapoval, I. V. Tolstov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).





